Home Office staff to strike on eve of Games

Home Office staff to strike on eve of Games

Author
Discussion

martin84

5,366 posts

155 months

Monday 23rd July 2012
quotequote all
Jimboka said:
With all due respect - you're talking rubbish...
So I'm wrong when I say only 20% bothered to vote? Oh no wait, that's correct.

I'm wrong when I say Theresa May has probably the worst relationship with the Home Office of any Home Secretary in living memory? No, that's pretty accurate as well.

Which bit is the rubbish? Tell me.

DJRC

23,563 posts

238 months

Tuesday 24th July 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
Jimboka said:
With all due respect - you're talking rubbish...
So I'm wrong when I say only 20% bothered to vote? Oh no wait, that's correct.

I'm wrong when I say Theresa May has probably the worst relationship with the Home Office of any Home Secretary in living memory? No, that's pretty accurate as well.

Which bit is the rubbish? Tell me.
Id say its on a par with most of the rest of them. The Home Office has always been the awkward job and the Home Office minister *always* cops the most flack outside of the PM and Chancellor. Its always been a stty job and it always will be. You throw an aggressive *alpha* female into the mix and welcome to the party.

May's trouble is that she is a "womans woman" and not a "mans woman", hence all the girls swooning over the kitten heels thing, fashion in govt, etc,etc. Blokes just rolled their eyes. Maggie was a blokes bird so could do her thing, May cant.

Whilst I have no doubt that if I had to work with her, May would rub me up the wrong way something chronic, I also harbour strong suspicions that the Home Office is fking useless and needs someone taking it to task from top to bottom.

greygoose

8,329 posts

197 months

Tuesday 24th July 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
Id say its on a par with most of the rest of them. The Home Office has always been the awkward job and the Home Office minister *always* cops the most flack outside of the PM and Chancellor. Its always been a stty job and it always will be. You throw an aggressive *alpha* female into the mix and welcome to the party.

May's trouble is that she is a "womans woman" and not a "mans woman", hence all the girls swooning over the kitten heels thing, fashion in govt, etc,etc. Blokes just rolled their eyes. Maggie was a blokes bird so could do her thing, May cant.

Whilst I have no doubt that if I had to work with her, May would rub me up the wrong way something chronic, I also harbour strong suspicions that the Home Office is fking useless and needs someone taking it to task from top to bottom.
May hasn't done well but neither has Damian Green as Immigration Minister, he seems totally invisible and should have lost his job after they paid Brodie Clark off with £200,000.

DJRC

23,563 posts

238 months

Tuesday 24th July 2012
quotequote all
Probably because Damien Green is a small fry nobody compared to the much bigger fish of having Teresa May to fry.

martin84

5,366 posts

155 months

Tuesday 24th July 2012
quotequote all
So you're essentially saying the reason the Home Office and the Police etc don't like Theresa May is because she's a woman?

Bloody hell what a cop out. Yes it's a difficult job but it's a difficult job she's doing incredibly badly, which is more relevant than her gender.

I have a feeling PH'ers wouldn't defend a Labour female Home Secretary in the same way.

ukwill

8,936 posts

209 months

Tuesday 24th July 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
So I'm wrong when I say only 20% bothered to vote? Oh no wait, that's correct.

I'm wrong when I say Theresa May has probably the worst relationship with the Home Office of any Home Secretary in living memory? No, that's pretty accurate as well.

Which bit is the rubbish? Tell me.
The Home Office budget in 08/09 was nigh on £12b. It's planned to be £8.9 next year.

Somewhere in that is the underlying and somewhat fundamental reason why Theresa May is getting it in the neck.

Still, Jacquie 42 day detention Smith is certainly in living memory...

onyx39

11,145 posts

152 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
strike now apparently cancelled / postponed..

McHaggis

Original Poster:

50,944 posts

157 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
strike now apparently cancelled / postponed..
Yup.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-18982453

anonymous-user

56 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
strike now apparently cancelled / postponed..
Apparently because the government has agreed to 100s of new, non productive, non contributing 'jobs'.

FFS


Eric Mc

122,335 posts

267 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
The Union copped on that a strike at this precise moment would be disastrous for their cause so this is a face-saving exercise.

I wonder when Mark Serotka will be ousted?

elster

17,517 posts

212 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
onyx39 said:
strike now apparently cancelled / postponed..
Apparently because the government has agreed to 100s of new, non productive, non contributing 'jobs'.

FFS
You mean jobs that have been advertised for a while already?

Fittster

20,120 posts

215 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The Union copped on that a strike at this precise moment would be disastrous for their cause so this is a face-saving exercise.

I wonder when Mark Serotka will be ousted?
?

"A strike by Border Agency staff on the eve of the Olympics has been called off, sparing likely disruption at Heathrow airport and travel hubs around the UK on Thursday, after the Public and Commercial Services union claimed the government had performed an about-turn on job cuts.

Home Office members of the UK's largest civil services union were preparing to stage a one-day strike the day before Friday's opening ceremony, hitting services at immigration control as well as the passport service and the Criminal Records Bureau.

Speaking one hour before the government was due to launch a high court challenge against the looming strike, the PCS general secretary, Mark Serwotka, said a Home Office decision to hire 1,100 staff – including 800 border employees – had convinced the union to cancel its plans. "We believe that significant progress means that there is no case for the union to proceed with industrial action tomorrow," he said.

The PCS said the job adverts went a long way to clawing back Border Agency job cuts over the past two years, which were one of the key factors in the dispute. The 1,100 new jobs include a planned 300 extra staff at the Passport Service, the PCS said."

Eric Mc

122,335 posts

267 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
And you really believe that's why the strike was called off?

Fittster

20,120 posts

215 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
And you really believe that's why the strike was called off?
What facts do you have?

McHaggis

Original Poster:

50,944 posts

157 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
Wild guess:

Mark Serotka OBE in the new year for services to his members...

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

188 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
elster said:
You mean jobs that have been advertised for a while already?
If so, why were the union striking over job cuts?

ukwill

8,936 posts

209 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
McHaggis said:
Wild guess:

Mark Serotka OBE in the new year for services to his members...
Wild guess: Mark Serwotka is not a monarchist.

Eric Mc

122,335 posts

267 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
Fittster said:
Eric Mc said:
And you really believe that's why the strike was called off?
What facts do you have?
Well, we have two statements.

One from Serotka claiming that he has successfully negotiated new jobs and claiming that it is because of this that the strike has been called of.

We also have a government statement saying that these jobs had been negotiated for and agreed months ago and had nothing to do with the call off of the strike.

Funny how the strike was called off with barely 60 minutes before a court was going to rule on its legality.

I reckon the word was coming down the the strike was going to be deemed by the judge to have been illegally called.

McHaggis

Original Poster:

50,944 posts

157 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
ukwill said:
Wild guess: Mark Serwotka is not a monarchist.
Wild guess: he accepts anyway.

DJRC

23,563 posts

238 months

Wednesday 25th July 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
So you're essentially saying the reason the Home Office and the Police etc don't like Theresa May is because she's a woman?

Bloody hell what a cop out. Yes it's a difficult job but it's a difficult job she's doing incredibly badly, which is more relevant than her gender.

I have a feeling PH'ers wouldn't defend a Labour female Home Secretary in the same way.
Because you are a moron who cant read, Ill repost what I wrote:

"Id say its on a par with most of the rest of them. The Home Office has always been the awkward job and the Home Office minister *always* cops the most flack outside of the PM and Chancellor. Its always been a stty job and it always will be. You throw an aggressive *alpha* female into the mix and welcome to the party."

Ill tell you what, Ill highlight some bits for you to aid in your understanding:

"The Home Office has always been the awkward job and the Home Office minister *always* cops the most flack outside of the PM and Chancellor. Its always been a stty job and it always will be."

Right, now that we have established I was saying the above and not what you thought I was "essentially saying" , lets deal with that shall we? The Home Office doesnt like the Minister because the Home Office *never* likes the Minister. Every single one of them is treated with contempt by the dept. and its de facto modus operandi of continuing to function how it wants whilst taking as little notice as possible of the personal nominally in charge because they are absolutely convinced they know better and that said person will be replaced in a matter of months anyway. The more a Minister tries to interfere with the actual running of the dept, the more they make life awkward. British domestic political history is littered with these incidents. There is a reason the Yes Minister series lampoons it...and a reason it is so sharp and close to the bone. The Police dont like the Minister because in the last 40 yrs the dynamic has changed from the Minister being their boss who always protected them to being the boss who always shines a light on them to find bad behavior to hold upto the public to show "they are on the side of society". Ministers have spent the last 40yrs making the Police their private punchbags to make themselves look good whilst at the same time using them as their enforcers, safe behind the "no strike" legislation.

Now then, take that base level of opposition and throw into the mix someone who's personality is one that inherently will aggravate a large section of those she is in charge of. You can slice and dice that along whatever lines you wish, gender or otherwise, but its still only ever going to result in one thing...a right ballache.