UKIP First 100 Days WTF!!!
Discussion
mcgandalf said:
Watching it now - am a die-hard Tory, but I have 3 months to reconsider this. If anything this will further endear Nigel to me.
I don't get this, please indulge me, I understand it was terrible TV, factually dubious and possibly political motivated.. But, why would this program further endear you to Nigel and promote you to vote UKIP? I don't understand.Adrian W said:
We've already seen the Tory's first thousand days, and what a fk up they've made of it
- Tories'.
Megaflow said:
Kindly stop bringing facts and data to a leftie bhing session please.
And if you think Gordon was an economic genius......You may recall that he said for at least the first two years New Labour takes over - there will be no change to Ken Clarke's spending plans.
"He became notorious during Labour's first two years in office for sticking to Conservative spending plans."
Source: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/mar/06/budget20...
"This strategy was built on in January 1997 when shadow chancellor Gordon Brown accepted Tory spending plans for Labour's first two years in office - should the party be elected."
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/b...
And not forgetting all the gold he sold for Euro's in 1999 (at rock bottom prices) giving him a surplus.
Let's see that chart again - and remind ourselves of just how wonderful Labour was with our credit cards.
I liked it. Very interesting. UKIP probably wont get any more tham the 2 stolen seats they have now but I dont think it is far from what would happen if we got a UKIP government.
How else would they send all ethniks back to the motherland? By stopping every wrong shade person on the street of course.
How else would they send all ethniks back to the motherland? By stopping every wrong shade person on the street of course.
LucreLout said:
Well, yes, how else do you think labour will get any votes?
Lets imagine they had to make three honest statements rather than tell lies... All they'd have is:
Yep, we fked the economy for everyone and it'll take two more generations before it gets better.
Yep, we fked the country with rampant unchecked open door immigration. (I believe immigration can be good and is on the whole positive but we had too many come too fast and nobody is integrated).
Our only policy is to buy votes from our client state of public sector staff, unionised morons, and the workshy benefits brigade.
Doesn't make for nearly such an appealing campaign as banging on about bankers, tories, tax evasion etc.
Unionised morons?Lets imagine they had to make three honest statements rather than tell lies... All they'd have is:
Yep, we fked the economy for everyone and it'll take two more generations before it gets better.
Yep, we fked the country with rampant unchecked open door immigration. (I believe immigration can be good and is on the whole positive but we had too many come too fast and nobody is integrated).
Our only policy is to buy votes from our client state of public sector staff, unionised morons, and the workshy benefits brigade.
Doesn't make for nearly such an appealing campaign as banging on about bankers, tories, tax evasion etc.
What makes you think belonging to a union equals a guaranteed labour vote, i belong to the cwu and i won't be voting labour nor will many of my colleagues (although take that with a pinch of salt that's only 4 people)
Adrian W said:
egor110 said:
So when's Labour first 100 days being shown ?
We've already seen the Tory's first thousand days, and what a fk up they've made of itI'm working class blue collar union card holding person so guess i should lean towards labour, yet i like ukips immigration policy combined with shocking the normal labour/conservative status quo, but on the other hand with conservative my interest rate is a record low and i can earn more before paying any tax.
Eclassy said:
I liked it. Very interesting. UKIP probably wont get any more tham the 2 stolen seats they have now but I dont think it is far from what would happen if we got a UKIP government.
How else would they send all ethniks back to the motherland? By stopping every wrong shade person on the street of course.
When has UKIP ever concerned themselves with people's colour?How else would they send all ethniks back to the motherland? By stopping every wrong shade person on the street of course.
Esseesse said:
Eclassy said:
I liked it. Very interesting. UKIP probably wont get any more tham the 2 stolen seats they have now but I dont think it is far from what would happen if we got a UKIP government.
How else would they send all ethniks back to the motherland? By stopping every wrong shade person on the street of course.
When has UKIP ever concerned themselves with people's colour?How else would they send all ethniks back to the motherland? By stopping every wrong shade person on the street of course.
This poor chap is a little overwrought, poor lamb.
I expect most will react after a more measured fashion.
I expect most will react after a more measured fashion.
Edited by Zod on Tuesday 17th February 14:56
egor110 said:
See I'm not sure i agree.
I'm working class blue collar union card holding person so guess i should lean towards labour, yet i like ukips immigration policy combined with shocking the normal labour/conservative status quo, but on the other hand with conservative my interest rate is a record low and i can earn more before paying any tax.
The problem is some of UKIPs policies further down the list.I'm working class blue collar union card holding person so guess i should lean towards labour, yet i like ukips immigration policy combined with shocking the normal labour/conservative status quo, but on the other hand with conservative my interest rate is a record low and i can earn more before paying any tax.
I think of a lot of UKIP supporters are like like Greens supporters.
They very heavily agree with the major points but don't know what else the party stand for that they will disagree with, and they forget that these policies will also be brought into the mix.
- Obviously everyone in NP&E will know all the party policies backwards and will not fall under this generalisation.
Einion Yrth said:
Esseesse said:
Eclassy said:
I liked it. Very interesting. UKIP probably wont get any more tham the 2 stolen seats they have now but I dont think it is far from what would happen if we got a UKIP government.
How else would they send all ethniks back to the motherland? By stopping every wrong shade person on the street of course.
When has UKIP ever concerned themselves with people's colour?How else would they send all ethniks back to the motherland? By stopping every wrong shade person on the street of course.
egor110 said:
Unionised morons?
What makes you think belonging to a union equals a guaranteed labour vote, i belong to the cwu and i won't be voting labour nor will many of my colleagues (although take that with a pinch of salt that's only 4 people)
£9 million your union has given to labour. How much, may I ask has it handed over to each of the conservatives, ukip, liberals, or greens?What makes you think belonging to a union equals a guaranteed labour vote, i belong to the cwu and i won't be voting labour nor will many of my colleagues (although take that with a pinch of salt that's only 4 people)
Yeah... Gives the game away, no?
omgus said:
The problem is some of UKIPs policies further down the list.
I think of a lot of UKIP supporters are like like Greens supporters.
They very heavily agree with the major points but don't know what else the party stand for that they will disagree with, and they forget that these policies will also be brought into the mix.
I have to ask, which policy(s) do you find to be the problem:I think of a lot of UKIP supporters are like like Greens supporters.
They very heavily agree with the major points but don't know what else the party stand for that they will disagree with, and they forget that these policies will also be brought into the mix.
- Obviously everyone in NP&E will know all the party policies backwards and will not fall under this generalisation.
http://www.ukip.org/policies_for_people
LucreLout said:
egor110 said:
Unionised morons?
What makes you think belonging to a union equals a guaranteed labour vote, i belong to the cwu and i won't be voting labour nor will many of my colleagues (although take that with a pinch of salt that's only 4 people)
£9 million your union has given to labour. How much, may I ask has it handed over to each of the conservatives, ukip, liberals, or greens?What makes you think belonging to a union equals a guaranteed labour vote, i belong to the cwu and i won't be voting labour nor will many of my colleagues (although take that with a pinch of salt that's only 4 people)
Yeah... Gives the game away, no?
Why would any union give money to conservatives? They have there big business pals donating huge sums so seems only the smaller parties need to sort of financing .
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff