Oz body slam, now house mistress abuses boys in NSW.

[Aberdeenloon]

There was a thread going last week and a few people were trying to make the point that watching kiddie porn was far less serious than making it. I don't agree. If you watch it, you should pay a VERY severe penalty.

Back on topic, this schoolteacher should be treated the same as a man.

[Prof Prolapse]

Aberdeenloon said:

Back on topic, this schoolteacher should be treated the same as a man.

Surely only if the victims were adversely affected to the same extent? Punishment should be proportional to crime after all.

A stern punishment is of course required in any circumstance though.

[Aberdeenloon]

Prof Prolapse said:

Surely only if the victims were adversely affected to the same extent? Punishment should be proportional to crime after all.

A stern punishment is of course required in any circumstance though.

It's sexual abuse of children FFS! There's no difference if the perpetrator is male or female.

[Prof Prolapse]

Aberdeenloon said:

It's sexual abuse of children FFS! There's no difference if the perpetrator is male or female.

I'm not saying it is different based on whether or not the perpetrator is male or female. Frankly I think she needs to be put away for a long time.

I'm just pointing out that, to satisfy morality, surely the adverse effect on the victims should be a big consideration of the sentence.

[singlecoil]

Godzuki said:

Eric Mc said:

That's not the way the law sees it.

Condoning something is NOT the same as doing it.

What is the law with having kiddy porn on your computer? How does the law see that 'passive' act?

I was under the impression that the law on that point was well known.

But, for the avoidance of doubt, that is not the point that Eric is making. In any case, actively downloading such porn is not passive. If the porn had got there without the owner being involved then that would indeed be passive, and should not be punishable.

[Eric Mc]

Godzuki said:

Eric Mc said:

That's not the way the law sees it.

Condoning something is NOT the same as doing it.

What is the law with having kiddy porn on your computer? How does the law see that 'passive' act?

It is definitely against the law - and the offender would be punished according to the law. It's just that the law will differentiate between the two types of offences - i.e. watching and perpetrating.

[Godzuki]

I was responding to Erics response to Jesta, if that makes any sense.