Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 6
Discussion
2013BRM said:
Sorry for butting in guys but isn't it fair to say this move by the Saudis was unprecedented? with the exception, possibly, of the US? what is happening now isn't market fluctuation is it?
As I understand it, they've decided to defend market share rather than market price (presumably they're banking on prices rising again as they reap the benefits of a larger market share).Funk said:
What's alarming, Strocky, is that you can't see the truth and facts that are right in front of your face.
I'm not sure that he can't see it, more a case of he's happy to stare at trees as he doesn't like the woods.What's more alarming to me is that Strocky rarely (if ever?) makes a post that isn't an insult or a some irrelevant dissection of part of a post. I don't understand what fun you're getting Strocky. Is there an end game?
Funk said:
2013BRM said:
Sorry for butting in guys but isn't it fair to say this move by the Saudis was unprecedented? with the exception, possibly, of the US? what is happening now isn't market fluctuation is it?
As I understand it, they've decided to defend market share rather than market price (presumably they're banking on prices rising again as they reap the benefits of a larger market share).Strocky said:
Inconvenient truth, not deflection, it's not only the deluded Nats that need to wake up and smell the coffee
You'll have to explain what coffee needs to be smelled.Most intelligent Scots voted No.
The union is preserved according to the will of Scots.
The economic muppetry of the SNP has been laid bare.
Alex is in a downward spiral of denial and bitter recriminations.
The SNP present a minor threat of continued divisiveness at the next GE, but it seems the majority are now wide awake to the threat and will act accordingly to consign any SNP actual power to the dustbin of "nah, tried that, they were sh*te".
Interesting article in The Telegraph which echoes my own thoughts on the whole referendum and subsequent rush to give powers under devo-max...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11...
Funk said:
Interesting article in The Telegraph which echoes my own thoughts on the whole referendum and subsequent rush to give powers under devo-max...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11...
Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11...
Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
Strocky said:
Funk said:
Interesting article in The Telegraph which echoes my own thoughts on the whole referendum and subsequent rush to give powers under devo-max...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11...
Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11...
Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
Strocky said:
Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote
Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
Lol you are moronic - a £10k bonus for the editor of That paper to help ensure a no vote. Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
You do realise how wealthy they are how much they earn each year and that after tax its fk all £5.5k...
Had you said £1m or a lot more then maybe - along with the relevant proof yet i smell bull st so call upon you to provide the custard test.
Strocky said:
Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote
Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
oh fk offRe Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
You bunch of half brains were scared stless of proper independence
Currency = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Open borders = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
DVLA = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
EU rebate = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Passport agency = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
BBC = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
embassies = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
nato membership = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Shipbuilding = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
bank of england = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Welshbeef said:
Strocky said:
Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote
Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
Lol you are moronic - a £10k bonus for the editor of That paper to help ensure a no vote. Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
You do realise how wealthy they are how much they earn each year and that after tax its fk all £5.5k...
Had you said £1m or a lot more then maybe - along with the relevant proof yet i smell bull st so call upon you to provide the custard test.
And it was a £20k bonus for a 60/40 margin
As you where, beef head
McWigglebum4th said:
Strocky said:
Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote
Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
oh fk offRe Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
You bunch of half brains were scared stless of proper independence
Currency = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Open borders = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
DVLA = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
EU rebate = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Passport agency = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
BBC = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
embassies = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
nato membership = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Shipbuilding = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
bank of england = Yep "independent" scotland wanted to share that
Strocky said:
Welshbeef said:
Strocky said:
Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote
Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
Lol you are moronic - a £10k bonus for the editor of That paper to help ensure a no vote. Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
You do realise how wealthy they are how much they earn each year and that after tax its fk all £5.5k...
Had you said £1m or a lot more then maybe - along with the relevant proof yet i smell bull st so call upon you to provide the custard test.
And it was a £20k bonus for a 60/40 margin
As you where, beef head
£20k lol that's £11k after tax (excl NI) for someone earning millions a year
I'll admit for someone on min wage or even on ave salary risking bribery for £20k pre tax may appeal to some but to honestly think that would appeal to people earning serious money to risk that salary ongoing and jail time for bribery - someone needs an IQ test (unless you think this chap is pig think and may take a punt on it)
Welshbeef said:
Strocky said:
Welshbeef said:
Strocky said:
Imbecilic racist nonsense in that article, not surprising from the Torygraph considering one of their editors was offered a £10k bonus to help ensure a NO vote
Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
Lol you are moronic - a £10k bonus for the editor of That paper to help ensure a no vote. Re Devo Max, It wasn't the YES sides fault that ONE poll put the stters up the BT coalition so much that Brown offered "near home rule"
Now look at the Smith Commission proposals (that still have to pass parliament) and look at Devo Max, there are nowhere near being one and the same thing
The Tories did their Scottish Labour buddies up like a kipper during the referendum got Labour to persuade the labour hardcore to vote NO (as they where too toxic to do it directly themselves), then sprung English Votes Laws for English Laws the day after the referendum safe in the knowledge that the Red Tories couldn't bank on their usual 40+ seats from Scotland making a Labour GE win more unlikely
You do realise how wealthy they are how much they earn each year and that after tax its fk all £5.5k...
Had you said £1m or a lot more then maybe - along with the relevant proof yet i smell bull st so call upon you to provide the custard test.
And it was a £20k bonus for a 60/40 margin
As you where, beef head
£20k lol that's £11k after tax (excl NI) for someone earning millions a year
I'll admit for someone on min wage or even on ave salary risking bribery for £20k pre tax may appeal to some but to honestly think that would appeal to people earning serious money to risk that salary ongoing and jail time for bribery - someone needs an IQ test (unless you think this chap is pig think and may take a punt on it)
http://www.thedrum.com/news/2014/09/17/scottish-da...
Oh dear seems the Unionist in question is pig THICK & a greedy grasping
Why an editor of the Telegraph would be on millions only you would know, did you convert that into Roubles?
Edited by Strocky on Sunday 28th December 21:37
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff