Jeremy Corbyn Vol. 2

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

160 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Gargamel said:
So when Corbyn says he was talking to the IRA, he wasn't negotiating an end to violence, he was agreeing with their aims.
I'm certain that there is an interpretation of this that shows Corbyn in a good light.

Unfortunately, I don't know what that interpretation could possibly be. I'm sure one of his acolytes will tell us.

P5BNij

15,875 posts

108 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all



zygalski

7,759 posts

147 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Meh.
Thatcher's government were in talks with the IRA days after the Brighton bombing.

P5BNij

15,875 posts

108 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
zygalski said:
Meh.
Thatcher's government were in talks with the IRA days after the Brighton bombing.
Maybe so, but they weren't openly honouring them were they?



roachcoach

3,975 posts

157 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
I remember reading about that ambush. Brits were not fking around.

wiki said:
600 spent cartridge cases from the SAS were recovered with approximately 125 bullet holes in the bodywork of the van. 78 spent cartridges cases were recovered that were fired by IRA weapons.
<snip>
all had multiple wounds and were shot in the head.

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
zygalski said:
Meh.
Thatcher's government were in talks with the IRA days after the Brighton bombing.
Acolyte!!!

djc206

12,480 posts

127 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
zygalski said:
Meh.
Thatcher's government were in talks with the IRA days after the Brighton bombing.
Of course they were, they were the sitting government not some irrelevant backbencher who wasn’t in talks anyway, he was just offering words of support and encouragement as an individual.

BOR

4,726 posts

257 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Fact is, he was on the winning side again. If more MPs had done the same thing, and got behind the nationalists, there could have been a power-sharing agreement a lot sooner.

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

188 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
BOR said:
Fact is, he was on the winning side again.
rofl

andymadmak

14,665 posts

272 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
BOR said:
Fact is, he was on the winning side again. If more MPs had done the same thing, and got behind the nationalists, there could have been a power-sharing agreement a lot sooner.
No. He wasn't. All he did was offer encouragement to the IRA. He has blood on his hands imho.
Peace came through a combination of determined diplomacy by brave politicians - of whom JC was most certainly not one - and the aftermath of the 9/11 terror act that pretty well saw the funding stream from North America dry up practically overnight.
JC was not interested in power sharing. He was supportive of a united Ireland. You would be stretching the truth beyond any notion of credulity to claim that Corbyn was "on the winning side".

AstonZagato

12,766 posts

212 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
andymadmak said:
BOR said:
Fact is, he was on the winning side again. If more MPs had done the same thing, and got behind the nationalists, there could have been a power-sharing agreement a lot sooner.
No. He wasn't. All he did was offer encouragement to the IRA. He has blood on his hands imho.
Peace came through a combination of determined diplomacy by brave politicians - of whom JC was most certainly not one - and the aftermath of the 9/11 terror act that pretty well saw the funding stream from North America dry up practically overnight.
JC was not interested in power sharing. He was supportive of a united Ireland. You would be stretching the truth beyond any notion of credulity to claim that Corbyn was "on the winning side".
Quite. He did not get what he wanted at all.

irocfan

40,778 posts

192 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
andymadmak said:
No. He wasn't. All he did was offer encouragement to the IRA. He has blood on his hands imho.
Peace came through a combination of determined diplomacy by brave politicians - of whom JC was most certainly not one - and the aftermath of the 9/11 terror act that pretty well saw the funding stream from North America dry up practically overnight.
JC was not interested in power sharing. He was supportive of a united Ireland. You would be stretching the truth beyond any notion of credulity to claim that Corbyn was "on the winning side".
Mo Mowlem (among others) most certainly yes... Jezzzzzzzzzza. Hmmmm, shall we just say not so much. I rather suspect he was another one whinging about 'death on the rock' too

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
BOR said:
Fact is, he was on the winning side again. If more MPs had done the same thing, and got behind the nationalists, there could have been a power-sharing agreement a lot sooner.
rolleyes Idiot. He was an utter irrelevance to the peace process. If anything his support for the terrorists helped legitimise their recruiting.

The Dangerous Elk

4,642 posts

79 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
BOR said:
Fact is, he was on the winning side again..
Incredible that anybody can be than unaware of facts.

Supercilious Sid

2,587 posts

163 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
The Dangerous Elk said:
Incredible that anybody can be than unaware of facts.
We are living in post-truth world where the Momentum brown shirts are blind to history.

The Dangerous Elk

4,642 posts

79 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Supercilious Sid said:
The Dangerous Elk said:
Incredible that anybody can be than unaware of facts.
We are living in post-truth world where the Momentum brown shirts are blind to history.
BOR said:
Russia owns London.
Russia pours billions into the City of London money laundromat.
Russia owns us.

Retaliation? Russia quakes in fear of the UK expelling some diplomats. Oh My G.

chris watton

22,477 posts

262 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Supercilious Sid said:
The Dangerous Elk said:
Incredible that anybody can be than unaware of facts.
We are living in post-truth world where the Momentum brown shirts are blind to history.
I would think to people as disturbed as BOR, truth is recognised as hate speech, and anyone who dares disagree with them are immediately described as 'alt-right'

LoonyTunes

3,362 posts

77 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Can anyone please show me a quote from Corbyn where he supports the IRA killings. Not their aim of a United Ireland but the killing/bombing method they were using in trying to achieve their goals.

Likewise an anti-semitic quote from Corbyn. Not a pro-palestinian quote (or pro palestinian aims of reclaiming the land) but an actual anti-semitic quote.

There was a phone-in radio show this morning on this and NOBODY could do it. In fact after a while it became embarrassing as caller after caller rang in with zero evidence for either and was dispatched quickly by the presenter.

The Dangerous Elk

4,642 posts

79 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
Like supporting Hitler but not the bad stuff ?

Daft logic

Sway

26,455 posts

196 months

Monday 26th March 2018
quotequote all
LoonyTunes said:
Can anyone please show me a quote from Corbyn where he supports the IRA killings. Not their aim of a United Ireland but the killing/bombing method they were using in trying to achieve their goals.
The Labour leader was “happy to commemorate all those who died fighting for an independent Ireland” at an event organised by Republican leaders in London’s Conway Hall during the 1987 general election.

From here: http://www.cityam.com/265655/jeremy-corbyn-cant-re...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED