45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 3

45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 3

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

rscott

14,869 posts

193 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Funkycoldribena said:
So you didnt bump into one of the 63 million then?
Still leaves a lot of people who didnt care enough to vote as well.
Is this a bit like brexit where remainers never met/meet anyone who voted leave?
I've met a few in Atlanta and Arkansas who voted for him. Every single one wouldn't do so again. Some didn't want Clinton so voted for, the others believed his lies about wanting to improve the lot of the average American(their words, not mine)

AreOut

3,658 posts

163 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Missing points seems to be the preserve of Trumpettes. Is it the blinkers that cause it, I wonder?
so what was the point again? More people didn't vote at all than for the winner in all of US elections.

rscott said:
In 2004, 62M voted for the winner, 59M for the loser. Somewhat different to 2016 where the winner had fewer votes than 2nd place...
it also happened before, I don't know if it's right or not but Donald wasn't the one creating the system so why accuse him for it

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
I think the whole USA is being humiliated day in day out by having him as president. But if they re-elect him in 2020, frankly they deserve to be ridiculed and laughed at by the rest of the world.
Well there's an old saying in Tennessee you know, fool me once....
https://youtu.be/KjmjqlOPd6A

Eric Mc

122,345 posts

267 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
AreOut said:
Eric Mc said:
Missing points seems to be the preserve of Trumpettes. Is it the blinkers that cause it, I wonder?
so what was the point again? More people didn't vote at all than for the winner in all of US elections.
Sorry, I misled you about the blinkers.

I should have said "blindfold".

XCP

16,973 posts

230 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Funkycoldribena said:
I can put myself forward for Olympic Javelin in 2050 but it doesnt mean my body will manage it.
No, you can't. 2048 or 2052, but not 2050.

Funkycoldribena

7,379 posts

156 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
XCP said:
No, you can't. 2048 or 2052, but not 2050.
I knew I'd probably be wrong but couldn't be bothered to look.smile

Eric Mc

122,345 posts

267 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Maybe FCR plans on entering for the Javelin competition in the 2050 Winter Olympics. He's guaranteed a gold medal as he'll be the only competitor.

Shrewd move, I say.

Funkycoldribena

7,379 posts

156 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
968 said:
The Dangerous Elk said:
FYI, I have run out of tinfoil.
Is it the cognitive dissonance hitting you again?
I'm pretty sure it isn't who you think it is.

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
I spend most of my time stateside and yes, many of them care, very much. They are ashamed and embarrassed by the Trump debacle.

Don't forget only 63 million people voted for Trump, in a country with a population of over 320 million.
I think it's fairer to use, what yanks call, the VEP, voting eligible population, which was 230.6 million.

paulguitar

24,202 posts

115 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Halb said:
paulguitar said:
I spend most of my time stateside and yes, many of them care, very much. They are ashamed and embarrassed by the Trump debacle.

Don't forget only 63 million people voted for Trump, in a country with a population of over 320 million.
I think it's fairer to use, what yanks call, the VEP, voting eligible population, which was 230.6 million.
Yep, agreed.

Byker28i

61,822 posts

219 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
rscott said:
It'll also depend on who the Democrats put up against him. He got in partly due to support from (Anyone But Hillary) voters. It can't be one of the same old faces - needs to be a younger, more dynamic candidate with far less baggage.
I agree, needs to be someone dynamic. Obama rather set the standard

Byker28i

61,822 posts

219 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Blackpuddin said:
Trump put his name up for a second term as soon as he was inaugurated for the first one.
But only so he could immediately continue with his rally's building up 'election funds', which have been used for all sorts of things, such as paying his legal bills and those of his family.

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
I think it need to be someone who isn't from that establishment, not another Clinto/Bush/Obama. I'd like to see Bernie again...but he's too old.

Question is, will the DEms learn why they fked it so hard...I'm willing to say...no, they haven't learned one single thing and they'll rerun their nomination process pretty much like they id in 2016.

mx5nut

5,404 posts

84 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Serious question:

What do Trump's remaining fans - of which there are several here - get out of still supporting him at this point?

He's achieved virtually nothing he set out to do and speaks like an angry toddler. Are they deliberately ignoring the reality of how he acts and the things he says?

Or does none of that matter because he still represents their last hurrah against a world they see as too politically correct, too liberal and - well - too scary?

Byker28i

61,822 posts

219 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all

anonymous-user

56 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Robertj21a said:
Funkycoldribena said:
So you didnt bump into one of the 63 million then?
Still leaves a lot of people who didnt care enough to vote as well.
Is this a bit like brexit where remainers never met/meet anyone who voted leave?
No, Remainers never met any Leavers because they never travel outside the metropolitan centres (or M25)

Sorry to go further off topic.......
Can't help but think that if we had the EU referendum again Remain would win.

Same goes for US presidency - trump would not win now. Although I do realise Hillary is despised in a lot of areas of the US...well she must be to vote for someone like Trump!

Justices

3,681 posts

166 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Met a Trump voter in Los Angeles. A proper petrolhead too, won't go into who but well known.

His stance was that things needed shaking up and Hillary was shady as sin. And genuinely believed Trump could deliver "something".

I'll admit my estimation of him dropped after that conversation. The voters seemed to be sold on Hillary being your typical politician who has been caught out doing misdeeds, which is reasonable given all the press. However, it's still impossible to think that given the campaign and lack of moral quality, awful business practice and generally poor character, that anyone would cast a vote for Trump.

Genuinely baffling to this day.

mx5nut

5,404 posts

84 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
Justices said:
Met a Trump voter in Los Angeles. A proper petrolhead too, won't go into who but well known.

His stance was that things needed shaking up and Hillary was shady as sin. And genuinely believed Trump could deliver "something".
You'd expect these people to be furious that they've been conned by now.

GetCarter

29,444 posts

281 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
18 years on this forum... this is right up there. smile

“ Remainers never met any Leavers because they never travel outside the metropolitan centres (or M25)”

smn159

12,925 posts

219 months

Saturday 6th January 2018
quotequote all
mx5nut said:
Serious question:

What do Trump's remaining fans - of which there are several here - get out of still supporting him at this point?

He's achieved virtually nothing he set out to do and speaks like an angry toddler. Are they deliberately ignoring the reality of how he acts and the things he says?

Or does none of that matter because he still represents their last hurrah against a world they see as too politically correct, too liberal and - well - too scary?
Trumps schtick fits their worldview and to go against Trump might mean having to re-examine their own beliefs and prejudices.

Any evidence that Trump is an idiot / colluded with Russia / abused women is irrelevant - as long as he keeps on spouting the same slogans they're happy.

IMO
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED