Discussion
Cobnapint said:
Will all those that know Keith Vaz has something on them, please gather in the voting lobby to support his JSC selection. Thank-you...!
A general call-out out to washing machine salesmen, Cocaine dealers and young Romanian rent boys supporters ? Vaz-line has learnt well from his good friends, Blair, Mandelson and Co.
PurpleMoonlight said:
don4l said:
Using prostitutes, perhaps.
Is this normal in your world?
Sorry, what century do you live in?Is this normal in your world?
I would suggest that most of us do not use prostitutes.
The fact that you think that this is unusual suggests that your home life might be less than ideal.
PurpleMoonlight said:
don4l said:
Using prostitutes, perhaps.
Is this normal in your world?
Sorry, what century do you live in?Is this normal in your world?
Hellllllllllllllllllo boys. let's get this party started !!!!!!!!!!
don4l said:
That is a very odd response. We are, after all, talking about the "oldest profession".
I would suggest that most of us do not use prostitutes.
The fact that you think that this is unusual suggests that your home life might be less than ideal.
It is indeed, but you still think seeing one is perverted.I would suggest that most of us do not use prostitutes.
The fact that you think that this is unusual suggests that your home life might be less than ideal.
I thought society had largely moved beyond that but I guess not everyone.
PurpleMoonlight said:
don4l said:
That is a very odd response. We are, after all, talking about the "oldest profession".
I would suggest that most of us do not use prostitutes.
The fact that you think that this is unusual suggests that your home life might be less than ideal.
It is indeed, but you still think seeing one is perverted.I would suggest that most of us do not use prostitutes.
The fact that you think that this is unusual suggests that your home life might be less than ideal.
I thought society had largely moved beyond that but I guess not everyone.
Bloody Hell???
Some people think that Vaz is a fit person. Many MPs seem to think that he is a fit person. Is it any wonder that politicians are held in such contempt?
Consider the following:-
He was suspended from parliament for making false allegations against the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner.
It was found that he had given false information to the Standards and Privileges Committee and Elizabeth Filkin about his financial relationship to the Hinduja brothers.
Failing to register his paid employment at the Leicester Law Centre when he first entered parliament in 1987.
Failing to register a donation from the Caparo group in 1993.
Failing to register complimentary hospitality and hotel rooms supplied by Indian tycoon Joginder Sanger which he used for encounters with young men in 2013 and 2014.
He denied receiving cash from from a solicitor, Sarosh Zaiwalla. He was later found to have received £4,500 and censured as a result.
He has previously been found in Contempt of the House.
He lobbied against the extradition of the Anglo-Iraqi billionaire Nadhmi Auchi to France when he was in the pay of one of his companies.
He was described by then MP Patrick Mercer, as “a crook of the first order”, when recruiting him to his TV sting exposé inspired APPG. Mercer had chosen to recruit him because he said he had “never met an operator like him… I mean it’s not always completely ethical, but it’s stunning, he is an operator”.
Despite living just 45 minutes from Westminster Vaz claimed expenses for a Westminster flat.
Prostitutes were paid off by an employee of Vaz’s charity.
For some reason Leicestershire police, despite considering a range of possible offences including; wasteful employment of the police, attempting to pervert the course of justice and road traffic offences, have failed to prosecute him. Ordinary police officers felt he was untouchable by virtue of his position of influence on the Home Affairs Committee. Putting him on the Justice Committee risks repeating that error of judgement.
Consider the following:-
He was suspended from parliament for making false allegations against the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner.
It was found that he had given false information to the Standards and Privileges Committee and Elizabeth Filkin about his financial relationship to the Hinduja brothers.
Failing to register his paid employment at the Leicester Law Centre when he first entered parliament in 1987.
Failing to register a donation from the Caparo group in 1993.
Failing to register complimentary hospitality and hotel rooms supplied by Indian tycoon Joginder Sanger which he used for encounters with young men in 2013 and 2014.
He denied receiving cash from from a solicitor, Sarosh Zaiwalla. He was later found to have received £4,500 and censured as a result.
He has previously been found in Contempt of the House.
He lobbied against the extradition of the Anglo-Iraqi billionaire Nadhmi Auchi to France when he was in the pay of one of his companies.
He was described by then MP Patrick Mercer, as “a crook of the first order”, when recruiting him to his TV sting exposé inspired APPG. Mercer had chosen to recruit him because he said he had “never met an operator like him… I mean it’s not always completely ethical, but it’s stunning, he is an operator”.
Despite living just 45 minutes from Westminster Vaz claimed expenses for a Westminster flat.
Prostitutes were paid off by an employee of Vaz’s charity.
For some reason Leicestershire police, despite considering a range of possible offences including; wasteful employment of the police, attempting to pervert the course of justice and road traffic offences, have failed to prosecute him. Ordinary police officers felt he was untouchable by virtue of his position of influence on the Home Affairs Committee. Putting him on the Justice Committee risks repeating that error of judgement.
Vazerlene is an odious 
of the first order and he should be in jail. Interesting that the tories were whipped (no pun intended!) to support his appointment, perhaps they are setting him up for a greater fall and to have a stick to beat the useful idiot and his labour cohorts with?
of the first order and he should be in jail. Interesting that the tories were whipped (no pun intended!) to support his appointment, perhaps they are setting him up for a greater fall and to have a stick to beat the useful idiot and his labour cohorts with?Edited by number 46 on Tuesday 1st November 10:53
Mr E said:
Apparently the Tories were whipped and voted for him. Labour hardly showed up.
Most odd.
Very strange. They're behaving as if they're under the control of a mafia Don.Most odd.
The only reason you would support this bandit is if you were a bandit yourself, or you wanted to help protect a close colleague who you knew was up to no good.
Stinks.
PurpleMoonlight said:
don4l said:
You think that society has "moved on" from keeping marriage vows?
Bloody Hell???
So breaking his marriage vows with a prostitute makes him a pervert?Bloody Hell???
PurpleMoonlight said:
don4l said:
You think that society has "moved on" from keeping marriage vows?
Bloody Hell???
So breaking his marriage vows with a prostitute makes him a pervert?Bloody Hell???
PurpleMoonlight said:
don4l said:
Using prostitutes, perhaps.
Is this normal in your world?
Sorry, what century do you live in?Is this normal in your world?
You're more to be pitied than scorned, perhaps.
don4l said:
PurpleMoonlight said:
don4l said:
That is a very odd response. We are, after all, talking about the "oldest profession".
I would suggest that most of us do not use prostitutes.
The fact that you think that this is unusual suggests that your home life might be less than ideal.
It is indeed, but you still think seeing one is perverted.I would suggest that most of us do not use prostitutes.
The fact that you think that this is unusual suggests that your home life might be less than ideal.
I thought society had largely moved beyond that but I guess not everyone.
Bloody Hell???
SplatSpeed said:
don4l said:
PurpleMoonlight said:
don4l said:
That is a very odd response. We are, after all, talking about the "oldest profession".
I would suggest that most of us do not use prostitutes.
The fact that you think that this is unusual suggests that your home life might be less than ideal.
It is indeed, but you still think seeing one is perverted.I would suggest that most of us do not use prostitutes.
The fact that you think that this is unusual suggests that your home life might be less than ideal.
I thought society had largely moved beyond that but I guess not everyone.
Bloody Hell???
REALIST123 said:
Nothing to with time, you clearly live in another world where perversions such as Vaz indulged in are acceptable. Not most of us, fortunately.
You're more to be pitied than scorned, perhaps.
You are not speaking for 'most of us'. You should seek, rather urgent, professional help. You're more to be pitied than scorned, perhaps.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff