G20 - 1 Trillion Dollars

Author
Discussion

Bing o

15,184 posts

221 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Marf said:
5 pages in, the same question asked five or more times, so I take it no one knows where the money is coming from?

rasputin

1,449 posts

208 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
elster said:
Police State said:
A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.
Is that a financial trillion?

As in

$1,000,000,000,000
yes

elster

17,517 posts

212 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
rasputin said:
elster said:
Police State said:
A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.
Is that a financial trillion?

As in

$1,000,000,000,000
yes
Ouch!

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

245 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
BigJonMcQuimm said:
Winky is sending another 2000 troops to Afgan

Great ... er how will we pay for this?
Well, as well as being the world's second biggest debtor, the UK is also the world's second biggest 'helper outer' with economic aid and the third biggest defence spender. More reasons we're buried under debt.

Winky is a bit like Mrs Jellyby in Dickens' Bleak House who was rather over-occupied with good causes while her family starved.

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

245 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Bing o said:
Marf said:
5 pages in, the same question asked five or more times, so I take it no one knows where the money is coming from?
yes

And borrow it.

Marf

22,907 posts

243 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
bosscerbera said:
Bing o said:
Marf said:
5 pages in, the same question asked five or more times, so I take it no one knows where the money is coming from?
yes

And borrow it.
Who from?

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

245 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Marf said:
bosscerbera said:
yes (print it)

And borrow it.
Who from?
China, IMF... borrowed on the strength of future tax income. "Mortgaging the future."

FM

5,816 posts

222 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
outrageous theft from wordwide taxpayers it seems to me...is it really going to save jobs...?
no chance...

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

233 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
bosscerbera said:
BigJonMcQuimm said:
Winky is sending another 2000 troops to Afgan

Great ... er how will we pay for this?
Well, as well as being the world's second biggest debtor, the UK is also the world's second biggest 'helper outer' with economic aid and the third biggest defence spender. More reasons we're buried under debt.

Winky is a bit like Mrs Jellyby in Dickens' Bleak House who was rather over-occupied with good causes while her family starved.
Is the UK really the third largest defence spender?

Marf

22,907 posts

243 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
4th according to this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_...

perhaps not the best source I know.

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

245 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Marf said:
4th according to this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_...

perhaps not the best source I know.
I had France narrowly behind the UK, happy to stand corrected. smile

Still shocking though that after USA and China, who one would expect to be big spenders, that UK and France spend some 20% more than (of all nations!) Russia. Really, WTF do we have to defend? There are no natural resources to guard and we sold our gold and utility industries.

Cotty

39,757 posts

286 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Marf said:
5 pages in, the same question asked five or more times, so I take it no one knows where the money is coming from?


Edited by Cotty on Friday 3rd April 22:57

Uncle Fester

3,114 posts

210 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
The Bank of England prints money, and then lends that money into the banking system, the banking system can then use the money to buy up government bond issues, thereby financing government debt. Under the Basel rules, lending into OECD governments creates tier 1 capital, and therefore means that the banks are seen as meeting capital adequacy rules. In other words, the banks return to (apparent) solvency, and the government manages to continue borrowing, and does not default on the loans. In the meantime an Act of 1844 that required the Bank of England to publish the amount of currency issued was abolished.

The first point is that it does not create value, but transfers value from the existing supply of money. You cannot create value out of thin air. If there are 100 units of currency, and you just print 10 more, all you are doing is spreading the value of the 100 units into 110, such that all of the currency is devalued. This is, of itself, highly inflationary. It is also a form of taxation. In transferring some of the value from the currency in supply into the newly printed currency, there is a movement of value to the printer of the money - the Bank of England, and eventually the government. The government are quietly taxing ever more money to pay for their borrowing. It is the ultimate stealth tax.

The original question is the wrong one. It’s not where the money comes from, but the value that money represents. That comes from the labour of the workers within the system. It is the work you, I and our great grandchildren will perform.

anonymous-user

56 months

Saturday 4th April 2009
quotequote all
We really are absolutely fked, aren't we?

I genuinely never thought it would get this bad frown

PJ S

10,842 posts

229 months

Saturday 4th April 2009
quotequote all
Don't think many did either - and even if the populace realises just how farked up UK plc is, and vote a change of Government, it's not as if we can all breathe a sigh of relief overnight.
It'll take a lot longer than that to occur.

ShadownINja

76,704 posts

284 months

Saturday 4th April 2009
quotequote all


(Poor attempt, I know.)



Edited by ShadownINja on Saturday 4th April 12:03

blueyes

4,799 posts

254 months

Saturday 4th April 2009
quotequote all
Just found a post I made back in 2006 from this thread:

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...


"I have a feeling that after a few months of Brown, we'll look back on Tony Time as the good old days.

I REALLY hope I'm wrong."


I wasn't.


The thread makes interesting reading, especially understatement of the year from lenny007:

"The final comment i'd like to make is this. We're all hoping that slack jaw gets in and really mucks up so that Labour bite the bullet, but he's going to cause some damage to the country during that time - damage which could take the whole of the next government's first term to repair. Sobering thought."