Worlds largest paedophile ring discovered

[Frankeh]

Aberdeenloon said:

Sorry Frankeh, but I think you've got a seriously fked up, warped and quite frankly, worrying take on this.

My view is that paedophiles should be treated rather than imprisoned..

[nellyleelephant]

Treated??

[Frankeh]

nellyleelephant said:

Treated??

Like you treat someone for depression or about any other mental illness, yes.

[nellyleelephant]

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

[Frankeh]

nellyleelephant said:

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

Read up on chemical castration (Or surgical castration). It's not nice, but it seems to do the job.

Edit:Only one way. I'm sure there's many other methods but the above is the most extreme.

[Aberdeenloon]

Frankeh said:

nellyleelephant said:

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

Read up on chemical castration (Or surgical castration). It's not nice, but it seems to do the job.

Edit:Only one way. I'm sure there's many other methods but the above is the most extreme.

Physical castration would get my vote.

With a baseball bat.

[Eric Mc]

nellyleelephant said:

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

And your solution is?

[boredofmyoldname]

Eric Mc said:

I did say "alone".

That's fair enough, the attitude of large sections of society towards men who work with or for children is highly depressing at times.

[gtdc]

Frankeh said:

That was actually one of my arguments to him during his 'I'm doing nothing wrong!' years.
He did/does look at pictures/films and I put it to him that he was creating the demand for such material.. I then got schooled pretty comprehensively on how the scene actually works.

Basically, it's pokemon.
You swap pictures/movies you have made for pictures/movies that other people have made. This generally takes place on IRC and is the true heart of paedophilia on the internet.

Edited by Frankeh on Thursday 17th March 13:04

Surely if he's looking at/swapping/helping anyone else see these pictures then he's part of the machine and is as guilty as the people who abuse the children by taking the pictures. Not being the one to actually lay a finger on a child doesn't gift him any layer of detachment from the abuse.

[nellyleelephant]

Eric Mc said:

nellyleelephant said:

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

And your solution is?

I didn't say I had a solution, I was aking about something I hadn't heard of.

[Eric Mc]

nellyleelephant said:

Eric Mc said:

nellyleelephant said:

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

And your solution is?

I didn't say I had a solution, I was aking about something I hadn't heard of.

What are you debating then?

[nellyleelephant]

Eric Mc said:

nellyleelephant said:

Eric Mc said:

nellyleelephant said:

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

And your solution is?

I didn't say I had a solution, I was aking about something I hadn't heard of.

What are you debating then?

Erm, because I was asking about something I had never heard of? Sorry, I didn't know my posts had to be vetted first.

[Frankeh]

gtdc said:

Surely if he's looking at/swapping/helping anyone else see these pictures then he's part of the machine and is as guilty as the people who abuse the children by taking the pictures. Not being the one to actually lay a finger on a child doesn't gift him any layer of detachment from the abuse.

I'm not an expert on this but I believe that because he doesn't produce any 'original material' then all he is doing is swapping leaked images with people who have other leaked images.

It's like me swapping a picture of Jessica alba for a picture you have of Natalie Portman.. Neither of us took the picture, know Natalie Portman or the photographer.

We're certainly not the reason the photographers originally took the picture, either.

Hope that helps.

[Aberdeenloon]

Frankeh said:

gtdc said:

Surely if he's looking at/swapping/helping anyone else see these pictures then he's part of the machine and is as guilty as the people who abuse the children by taking the pictures. Not being the one to actually lay a finger on a child doesn't gift him any layer of detachment from the abuse.

I'm not an expert on this but I believe that because he doesn't produce any 'original material' then all he is doing is swapping leaked images with people who have other leaked images.

It's like me swapping a picture of Jessica alba for a picture you have of Natalie Portman.. Neither of us took the picture, know Natalie Portman or the photographer.

We're certainly not the reason the photographers originally took the picture, either.

Hope that helps.

And that makes it all ok in your wold, eh Frankie?

[Frankeh]

Aberdeenloon said:

Frankeh said:

gtdc said:

Surely if he's looking at/swapping/helping anyone else see these pictures then he's part of the machine and is as guilty as the people who abuse the children by taking the pictures. Not being the one to actually lay a finger on a child doesn't gift him any layer of detachment from the abuse.

I'm not an expert on this but I believe that because he doesn't produce any 'original material' then all he is doing is swapping leaked images with people who have other leaked images.

It's like me swapping a picture of Jessica alba for a picture you have of Natalie Portman.. Neither of us took the picture, know Natalie Portman or the photographer.

We're certainly not the reason the photographers originally took the picture, either.

Hope that helps.

And that makes it all ok in your wold, eh Frankie?

What? No.
I think you need a lesson on reading comprehension.
At no point have I been condoning paedophilia or supporting it, I'm just saying that in my opinion it's an illness. It can't be discouraged like murder or stealing, it can only be treated.

Just to clear things up for the monumentally stupid. I don't support or condone paedophilia in any shape way or form.

[Eric Mc]

nellyleelephant said:

Eric Mc said:

nellyleelephant said:

Eric Mc said:

nellyleelephant said:

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

And your solution is?

I didn't say I had a solution, I was aking about something I hadn't heard of.

What are you debating then?

Erm, because I was asking about something I had never heard of? Sorry, I didn't know my posts had to be vetted first.

Obviously on completely different wavelengths here.

I'll cease commenting on this particular point for the moment.
I mentioned nothing about veting your posts.

[Brighton Derly]

Aberdeenloon said:

Frankeh said:

nellyleelephant said:

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

Read up on chemical castration (Or surgical castration). It's not nice, but it seems to do the job.

Edit:Only one way. I'm sure there's many other methods but the above is the most extreme.

Physical castration would get my vote.

With a baseball bat.

Bear trap, shirley.

[schmalex]

TVR1 said:

Fierce stuff

Jesus fella, that was harsh reading. Not quite sure what to say. I hope the bds were put away for a long, long time.

Alex

Edited by schmalex on Thursday 17th March 14:41

[tinman0]

Frankeh said:

It's like me swapping a picture of Jessica alba for a picture you have of Natalie Portman.. Neither of us took the picture, know Natalie Portman or the photographer.

We're certainly not the reason the photographers originally took the picture, either.

Hope that helps.

Yes 'you' are the reason the photographer took the picture.

Although the face value of the two pictures may be equal, they still have a value. If they were worthless, you would dis-guard them. But you don't. You trade them.

Which leads to the next question, what happens when you have seen all the cards? Someone steps in and produces a new card, which you in turn trade with that person who created them. Had that person not had 'you' to trade with, they may not produce the next picture. There is a constant supply of images that is fueled by users.

Just because your friend did not produce the material, does not excuse his actions.

And yes, it does need to be in bold because you don't seem to get it.

[nellyleelephant]

Eric Mc said:

nellyleelephant said:

Eric Mc said:

nellyleelephant said:

Eric Mc said:

nellyleelephant said:

Has this been done before then?
Don't see how you can treat urges, but I'm probably wrong.
Does that imply that any sexual orientation can be modified?

And your solution is?

I didn't say I had a solution, I was aking about something I hadn't heard of.

What are you debating then?

Erm, because I was asking about something I had never heard of? Sorry, I didn't know my posts had to be vetted first.

Obviously on completely different wavelengths here.

I'll cease commenting on this particular point for the moment.
I mentioned nothing about veting your posts.

Sorry, I'm tired, don't listen to me.