Discussion
Digby said:
desolate said:
Since getting Alpacas we haven't had an issue with foxes, but prior to that they were a serious nuisance.
And there you have it. A better solution than face shooting.In Britain.
That's your reasoning.
Just admit it.
You are arguing on an entirely emotional impulse, or trolling, and for my money it's now the latter.
What you object to, most of all I suspect, is other people being free to do things you don't like.
I don't like fox hunting with hounds either, however I am not arrogant enough to believe my opinions and feelings should be passed into law to be forced upon others.
Because I hold that view, I was actually disappointed to see fox hunting banned in the first place.
What really disturbed me at the time was the looks of rage and hatred in the faces of those demanding the ban, that just as you have previously declared, would rather "Shoot some humans and sort most of the worlds problems out" instead.
I heard them say it, and I saw them in print, while they pretended to occupy the higher moral ground.
Digby said:
Do you intened to find out the position of those who blow animals faces off at invited functions and enjoy watching dogs tear exhausted animals to pieces?
EDIT to add a couple of things
..based mostly on lies and bloodlust.
I know what I think of hunting with hounds and I really don't want to engage with Stickyfinger any more than I have to.EDIT to add a couple of things
..based mostly on lies and bloodlust.
Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 25th May 19:37
Goaty Bill 2 said:
Because being killed by a South American woolly camel is more 'natural' than being killed by a hound.
In Britain.
Quite rare for them to kill, but never let that get in the way of some lovely forum confrontation.In Britain.
They don't like unknown dogs, either. If the hunt goes through their field, they would surely tear them to pieces!!
Those dirty vermin Alpacas. Out of control they are! What we need are guns and no laws relating to how we use them.
(and sure, shoot some people - Governments are fantastic at it)
Goaty Bill 2 said:
..however I am not arrogant enough to believe my opinions and feelings should be passed into law to be forced upon others.
Well, they were passed in to law due to the fact the opinions and feelings of those who enjoy shooting animals and watching them get torn to pieces wasn't as important as the feelings of those who didn't want that.If you use arrogance as a word to describe your feelings towards those who torture animals over those who don't, nothing I say really matters.
(quote that last bit for some forum giggles)
Edited by Digby on Thursday 25th May 20:03
Digby said:
Goaty Bill 2 said:
Because being killed by a South American woolly camel is more 'natural' than being killed by a hound.
In Britain.
Quite rare for them to kill, but never let that get in the way of some lovely forum confrontation.In Britain.
They don't like unknown dogs, either. If the hunt goes through their field, they would surely tear them to pieces!!
Those dirty vermin Alpacas. Out of control they are! What we need are guns and no laws relating to how we use them.
(and sure, shoot some people - Governments are fantastic at it)
Goaty Bill 2 said:
..however I am not arrogant enough to believe my opinions and feelings should be passed into law to be forced upon others.
Well, they were passed in to law due to the fact the opinions and feelings of those who enjoy shooting animals and watching them get torn to pieces wasn't as important as the feelings of those who didn't want that.If you use arrogance as a word to describe your feelings towards those who torture animals over those who don't, nothing I say really matters.
(quote that last bit for some forum giggles)
Based upon all you have said, I can only assume the you either have not the slightest comprehension of the value of personal liberty, or you are, as I suggested previously, a troll.
Neither is worth my time or consideration.
May the fleas of a thousand foxes infest your home.
Goaty Bill 2 said:
Neither is worth my time or consideration.
Having people leave conversations when they do not like, or have no asnwer to the questions being asked etc, is nothing new.The "troll" joker was played earlier than expected, though.
Should I have stuck to slagging off cars?
Stickyfinger said:
No point talking to a person on the internet who will not even contemplate learning anything....
see ya
see ya
Stickyfinger said:
Stickyfinger said:
No point talking to a person on the internet who will not even contemplate learning anything....
see ya
see ya
Stickyfinger said:
Stickyfinger said:
as above
Halb said:
Digby said:
Beautiful. Saw one nip into an NCP the other night a young male. Was too slow with the camera. Six of them out tonight, too dark to get a decent pic again.
It looked like they were playing with some cloth
Out tonight.....want a photo via the night sight of some vermin ?
Bet you do not have many of these left near you
https://thehedgehog.co.uk/how-to-help-hedgehogs/da...
Bet you do not have many of these left near you
https://thehedgehog.co.uk/how-to-help-hedgehogs/da...
Edited by Stickyfinger on Thursday 25th May 22:27
Stickyfinger said:
Out tonight.....want a photo via the night sight of some vermin ?
Stickyfinger said:
No point talking to a person on the internet who will not even contemplate learning anything....
see ya
You really seem to be struggling with your own idea. You suggest you are no longer going to talk to me..... but you keep on talking to me. Perhaps this explains your hatred towards other things? A lack of control over your own actions..see ya
You are welcome to carry on doing so until the day either of us shuffles off, but I can't stress enough that pixels on a screen mean nothing to me. I never get angry, insulted, stressed.....anything! I would meet you, shake your hand and have a beer in a heartbeat. Nothing said on here means anything in my world.
You may not feel the same, of course.
Anyway, let me show you how easy it is to avoid internet confrontation, sidestep those who want to kill off topics and how easy it is to have control over your own actions..
I'll not speak to you again after this post
You may or may not try your best to make me, of course. Mum jokes, car questions, insults, cherry picking posts, stolen suggestions of me ignoring you because you are right etc, etc, etc. All of which will relate to issues you have..
A few links to help. Honestly, have a read.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-is-...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-31749753
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/mar/10/the-i...
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/why-is-everyone-s...
As you said (and failed to adhere to)..
..cya.
Digby said:
A57 HSV said:
As I said previously, most farmers I know want a fit, healthy and manageable population of foxes on their land. Hunting with hounds achieved that.
They want a population? What for?When they decide they have too many, the best way to get rid is to dress up and chase them until exhausted and have them torn to pieces?
What about these types?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/dav...
What do they want? Tell me.
(plenty more examples of this)
What about importing foxes to kill and creating homes for them due to there not being enough to hunt?
That's all about manageable populations, is it?
Time to stop lying to yourself.
Perhaps you've forgotten, but as I previously mentioned, fit and healthy foxes will take rabbits and rats. They'll also take newborn fawns and of course any carrion.
The Heythrop was hounded (excuse the pun) by Gavin Grant the highly politicised
RSPCA chief executive. After six failed attempts to prosecute the Heythrop, the RSPCA decided not use their In house legal team and instead hired the city law firm Fishburns at a cost of £326,980. The Heythrop couldn't afford to defend themselves. Full story:
http://www.williampowell.com/blog/news/the-rspca-t...
Edited by A57 HSV on Friday 26th May 01:41
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff