45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. (Vol 4)
Discussion
coyft said:
This is so boring.
She called for the harassment of political opponents.
The silly cow should be careful what she calls for.
OK, can you try saying this for me? I'll make it easy for you - just cut-n-paste from here:She called for the harassment of political opponents.
The silly cow should be careful what she calls for.
coyft said:
Trump called for violence against political opponents.
The silly ar5e should be careful what he calls for.
Go on... give it a go.The silly ar5e should be careful what he calls for.
DeejRC said:
Oh I'll take that bet!
How much are we wagering on this? I'm happy on £10. I presume by first up you mean within 12 months of the new appt?
I'll even offer you dbl or quits that RvW won't be touched by the time Donald leaves office.
Yes gentleman you can file this one firmly under what another poster on here described as the uniquely British desire to wind up fools who take things too seriously. Engage brains before posting chaps.
You're not winding anyone up mate. Sorry to burst your self-satisfied bubble.How much are we wagering on this? I'm happy on £10. I presume by first up you mean within 12 months of the new appt?
I'll even offer you dbl or quits that RvW won't be touched by the time Donald leaves office.
Yes gentleman you can file this one firmly under what another poster on here described as the uniquely British desire to wind up fools who take things too seriously. Engage brains before posting chaps.
Byker28i said:
coyft said:
Byker28i said:
Trump issued a veiled threat against Waters yesterday, she doesn't get secret service security, yet sanders does who didn't get to eat in a restaurant
Hardly a veiled threat.Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 27th June 20:08
Edited by Byker28i on Wednesday 27th June 20:10
He just told the silly cow to be careful what you wish for.
Congresswoman Maxine Waters, an extraordinarily low IQ person, has become, together with Nancy Pelosi, the Face of the Democrat Party. She has just called for harm to supporters, of which there are many, of the Make America Great Again movement. Be careful what you wish for Max!
6:11 PM - Jun 25, 2018
Now remember that the Donald is again lying here and that she didn't indeed call for harm to trump supporters, but for people to challenge them. He instead promotes these lies and trumpettes like coyft lap them up.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/26/us/politics/tru...
Then again, trump suggests violence many, many times.
https://mashable.com/2016/03/12/trump-rally-incite...
“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,” Trump told a crowd in Texas over the weekend. “If you see anybody from that party in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
That could well be taken as a threat. Just because Trump goes to that level I don't think officials should be saying stuff like that. People should be allowed to do their own stuff in private. How would you feel doing your job/ doing something you believe in, and being harassed everywhere?
I think Coyft is a bit (IMO) too pro-Trump, but some of you are not treating things as they are, and are just going liberal = good, Trump = bad.
coyft said:
Gameface said:
coyft said:
Gameface said:
Coyft is posting.
And lo and behold the bickering starts.
Another bore, who adds nothing to the debate.And lo and behold the bickering starts.
Practice what you preach.
You're labelling lots of people bores this evening.
We were warned not to make things personal on this thread by Kinky.
minimoog said:
DeejRC said:
Oh I'll take that bet!
How much are we wagering on this? I'm happy on £10. I presume by first up you mean within 12 months of the new appt?
I'll even offer you dbl or quits that RvW won't be touched by the time Donald leaves office.
Yes gentleman you can file this one firmly under what another poster on here described as the uniquely British desire to wind up fools who take things too seriously. Engage brains before posting chaps.
You're not winding anyone up mate. Sorry to burst your self-satisfied bubble.How much are we wagering on this? I'm happy on £10. I presume by first up you mean within 12 months of the new appt?
I'll even offer you dbl or quits that RvW won't be touched by the time Donald leaves office.
Yes gentleman you can file this one firmly under what another poster on here described as the uniquely British desire to wind up fools who take things too seriously. Engage brains before posting chaps.
NRS said:
Trump has called for violence before. However if you took what Waters said and put it under Trump then you'd most likely have people complaining about him threatening people (modified to change to right wing comments as it were).
“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,” Trump told a crowd in Texas over the weekend. “If you see anybody from that party in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
That could well be taken as a threat. Just because Trump goes to that level I don't think officials should be saying stuff like that. People should be allowed to do their own stuff in private. How would you feel doing your job/ doing something you believe in, and being harassed everywhere?
I think Coyft is a bit (IMO) too pro-Trump, but some of you are not treating things as they are, and are just going liberal = good, Trump = bad.
It's a fair point you make but I think what were seeing is dems kicking against the double standard whereby Trumpists get to say and do whatever they like (lock her up, f“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,” Trump told a crowd in Texas over the weekend. “If you see anybody from that party in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
That could well be taken as a threat. Just because Trump goes to that level I don't think officials should be saying stuff like that. People should be allowed to do their own stuff in private. How would you feel doing your job/ doing something you believe in, and being harassed everywhere?
I think Coyft is a bit (IMO) too pro-Trump, but some of you are not treating things as they are, and are just going liberal = good, Trump = bad.
k your feelings, press are the enemy of the people, Nazi marches, etc), but any dissent or protest is slapped down. Waters is simply saying fk that, we get to play by the same rules. Some Dems are uncomfortable with that, but the high road isn't going to work against Trump's core right wingers.
coyft said:
Gameface said:
coyft said:
Gameface said:
coyft said:
Gameface said:
Coyft is posting.
And lo and behold the bickering starts.
Another bore, who adds nothing to the debate.And lo and behold the bickering starts.
Practice what you preach.
You're labelling lots of people bores this evening.
We were warned not to make things personal on this thread by Kinky.
I didn't post until 21.37 and you were already arguing with other people then. So what "whole debate" have I started?
You accuse me of snarky comments but you've personally slighted numerous posters by repeatedly calling them bores.
I also must've missed your interesting posts, the like of which you demand of others.
So with regards to name calling and upholding posting standards you are not practicing what you preach.
Carry on by all means. No-one will miss you if you're banned.
You are clearly spoiling for an argument with whoever responds to you.
I will humour you no more.
Gameface said:
Making things up again.
I didn't post until 21.37 and you were already arguing with other people then. So what "whole debate" have I started?
You accuse me of snarky comments but you've personally slighted numerous posters by repeatedly calling them bores.
I also must've missed your interesting posts, the like of which you demand of others.
So with regards to name calling and upholding posting standards you are not practicing what you preach.
Carry on by all means. No-one will miss you if you're banned.
You are clearly spoiling for an argument with whoever responds to you.
I will humour you no more.
You add no value other than to snipe. I didn't post until 21.37 and you were already arguing with other people then. So what "whole debate" have I started?
You accuse me of snarky comments but you've personally slighted numerous posters by repeatedly calling them bores.
I also must've missed your interesting posts, the like of which you demand of others.
So with regards to name calling and upholding posting standards you are not practicing what you preach.
Carry on by all means. No-one will miss you if you're banned.
You are clearly spoiling for an argument with whoever responds to you.
I will humour you no more.
Possibly why so few people bother to monitor this thread.
minimoog said:
Looks like Trump will get to appoint another SCOTUS judge. Which pretty much means game over USA as we - and more immediately they - know it.
First up will be repeal of Roe vs Wade. Then watch the hammer come down on any number of civil liberties.
I believe this is what I’m on about. Now come on, fairs fair - you stated it and I’m calling you on it.First up will be repeal of Roe vs Wade. Then watch the hammer come down on any number of civil liberties.
I’ll take the bet. £10 stake, charity of your choice.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff