Nasty crash in B’Ham
Discussion
rscott said:
Willhire89 said:
On BBC1 now - the Ambo response
The impact on the young crew was pretty immense. I hope they've had the support they very clearly were going to need over the coming months.Shame the same cant be said for the members of the public:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-44...
rscott said:
Perhaps should be mandatory viewing for those caught speeding at that location.
It's the impact on others who needed the ambulance too. Having to spend 7 hours lying on the floor with a broken hip
The issue is those who speed won't see it as potentially them next. It's the impact on others who needed the ambulance too. Having to spend 7 hours lying on the floor with a broken hip
I went to a lad who was up for a death by dangerous driving charge in a week's time and he was laying there with an open fracture from his latest.
Some just don't care or see it coming.
Sa Calobra said:
rscott said:
Perhaps should be mandatory viewing for those caught speeding at that location.
It's the impact on others who needed the ambulance too. Having to spend 7 hours lying on the floor with a broken hip
The issue is those who speed won't see it as potentially them next. It's the impact on others who needed the ambulance too. Having to spend 7 hours lying on the floor with a broken hip
I went to a lad who was up for a death by dangerous driving charge in a week's time and he was laying there with an open fracture from his latest.
Some just don't care or see it coming.
The Mad Monk said:
rscott said:
Perhaps should be mandatory viewing for those caught speeding at that location.
People were not killed because of speed alone.There were additional factors IIRC
Alcohol
Drugs
Tiredness.
Simply going in excess of the speed limit didn't kill anyone.
WinstonWolf said:
In that particular incident the speed was the problem, the idiot driving had a huge amount of kinetic energy to dissipate.
Simple question...If they'd been stopped before the crash, would "exceeding the speed limit" have been the single most appropriate charge possible?
TooMany2cvs said:
WinstonWolf said:
In that particular incident the speed was the problem, the idiot driving had a huge amount of kinetic energy to dissipate.
Simple question...If they'd been stopped before the crash, would "exceeding the speed limit" have been the single most appropriate charge possible?
Digga said:
Precisely, it is beyond doubt that driving under the influence impairs judgement and reactions.
I'm not even sure that's the most appropriate. Seems a slam-dunk for Dangerous Driving, just about the most serious offence you can commit behind the wheel - same min 12mo ban as drink, but with mandatory extended retest, and with a sentencing guide starting point (with the aggravating factors) that includes crown court and prison.https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/item...
And that's before the "Causing Death by..." kicked in.
Warby80 said:
rscott said:
Willhire89 said:
On BBC1 now - the Ambo response
The impact on the young crew was pretty immense. I hope they've had the support they very clearly were going to need over the coming months.Shame the same cant be said for the members of the public:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-44...
The Mad Monk said:
People were not killed because of speed alone.
There were additional factors IIRC
Alcohol
Drugs
Tiredness.
Simply going in excess of the speed limit didn't kill anyone.
Anyone driving through some traffic in a suburban area albeit dual carriageway down a dip and rise would struggle at the speed reported. There were additional factors IIRC
Alcohol
Drugs
Tiredness.
Simply going in excess of the speed limit didn't kill anyone.
Blue light trained drivers would err on caution.
Speed does kill. If he was doing 40 he wouldn't have crashed.
TooMany2cvs said:
Digga said:
Precisely, it is beyond doubt that driving under the influence impairs judgement and reactions.
I'm not even sure that's the most appropriate. Seems a slam-dunk for Dangerous Driving, just about the most serious offence you can commit behind the wheel - same min 12mo ban as drink, but with mandatory extended retest, and with a sentencing guide starting point (with the aggravating factors) that includes crown court and prison.https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/item...
And that's before the "Causing Death by..." kicked in.
Sam. said:
Watched this last night. I can't even begin to imagine the mental difficulties that the job can cause to emergency services. I just hope that the help and care they need will be given to them.
These programs may just be for TV but it really does show what they do for us.
That was difficult viewing. Things like ages spent working on victims only for life to be extinguished. Then the raw guilt from the controllers who had prioritised Betty the 89 year old as lowest priority, only to learn that when a crew had finally got there after 6.5 hours they took her straight to QE with suspected sepsis.These programs may just be for TV but it really does show what they do for us.
rscott said:
Perhaps should be mandatory viewing for those caught speeding at that location.
Hold on a minute, that location has existed for over 40 years, and over 4 decades of speeding has produced nothing like this. To equate this act of drugged, criminal behaviour with 'speeding' and putting all other speeding drivers in the same category is ridiculous. Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff