Gammon?

[anonymous-user]

alfie2244 said:

Roman Rhodes said:

Of course. Your comment was directly linked to Picasso and his Blue Period? Probably not.

For PH interest the picture is in the Detroit Institute of Arts.

Didn't they make cars there once upon a time?

Allegedly! Bloke who donated it had some family link with the Ford family I believe. The paintings he bequeathed were worth $13m in 1969. Imagine the value now - many $100m’s.

[Smiler.]

Roman Rhodes said:

Of course. Your comment was directly linked to Picasso and his Blue Period? Probably not.

For PH interest the picture is in the Detroit Institute of Arts.

It's spreading.

[dandarez]

jjlynn27 said:

Gotta love targeted advertising, just had an add that i simply had to click that led me to ;

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B01EFRLQOW/ref...

Hey Lynnee, stop picking people up on here as being unintelligent when they make tiny insignificant spelling or grammatical errors.

Pot kettle
What on earth are you trying to 'total' above?
And that lower case 'i'. See, pernickety we can all be without mentioning the word 'intelligence'.
It should be 'ad', not 'add'.
Or preferably, as a Finn I would expect you try to use British English. ie: advert.

But being the 'know-it-all' that you are, with so much time on your green hands, I would really have expected to see 'advertisement'.

...had an add...

[crankedup]

jjlynn27 said:

crankedup said:

Looks an interesting ‘slice’ of architecture, love to see more of it. Meanwhile the ubiquitous bungalow to which you refer is a much sought after property, older people amongst an aging population find single story living perfect for thier lifestyle. Developers rarely build bungalows making the established property a great investment for longer term financial growth.

You don't recognize the house?

Nope, definitely not my property is all I can say.

[gooner1]

Gloria Slap said:

If he’s surplus you can send him home eh, back to where he came from eh Alfie?

You should get a T shirt printed!

Pure gammon!

This T- shirt, given this is the gammon thread should it read

" We won. Send them Ham"


"

[alfie2244]

gooner1 said:

Gloria Slap said:

If he’s surplus you can send him home eh, back to where he came from eh Alfie?

You should get a T shirt printed!

Pure gammon!

This T- shirt, given this is the gammon thread should it read

" We won. Send them Ham"


"

Please stop spamming this thread.

[gooner1]

alfie2244 said:

Please stop spamming this thread.

Pork off.

[Smiler.]

gooner1 said:

alfie2244 said:

Please stop spamming this thread.

Pork off.

Just leave it aloin.

[jjlynn27]

Smiler. said:

jjlynn27 said:

You who, while looking at the picture with the Ferrari and a house from one of the most famous movies of all time, you who find the bag interesting, you thought that woman with the bag is me? Your first thought when you see a picture of a random woman, is 'she looks like she seems to be permanently on her period'?

Not odd at all.

Keep digging.

Are you ok?

Most people would, and do, comment on the car and/or the house. You should be fine with the fact that you were drawn to the bag to the exclusion of everything else. You don't need to be defensive about it.
What is more disturbing, is that you see the woman in the picture and your reaction is that 'she seems to be permanently on her period'.
When you go outside, hopefully closely supervised, do you think that about every woman that goes by, or just women with particular bags?

Curious to see which Kray wannabe is going to jump (this is, obviously, a figure of speech) to your defence.

[WinstonWolf]

jjlynn27 said:

Smiler. said:

jjlynn27 said:

You who, while looking at the picture with the Ferrari and a house from one of the most famous movies of all time, you who find the bag interesting, you thought that woman with the bag is me? Your first thought when you see a picture of a random woman, is 'she looks like she seems to be permanently on her period'?

Not odd at all.

Keep digging.

Are you ok?

Most people would, and do, comment on the car and/or the house. You should be fine with the fact that you were drawn to the bag to the exclusion of everything else. You don't need to be defensive about it.
What is more disturbing, is that you see the woman in the picture and your reaction is that 'she seems to be permanently on her period'.
When you go outside, hopefully closely supervised, do you think that about every woman that goes by, or just women with particular bags?

Curious to see which Kray wannabe is going to jump (this is, obviously, a figure of speech) to your defence.

You on blob Princess?

(Happy to help )

[jjlynn27]

dandarez said:

jjlynn27 said:

Gotta love targeted advertising, just had an add that i simply had to click that led me to ;

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B01EFRLQOW/ref...

Hey Lynnee, stop picking people up on here as being unintelligent when they make tiny insignificant spelling or grammatical errors.

Pot kettle
What on earth are you trying to 'total' above?
And that lower case 'i'. See, pernickety we can all be without mentioning the word 'intelligence'.
It should be 'ad', not 'add'.
Or preferably, as a Finn I would expect you try to use British English. ie: advert.

But being the 'know-it-all' that you are, with so much time on your green hands, I would really have expected to see 'advertisement'.

...had an add...

I don't mind people correcting my English. I usually thank them for that. However, this is what native English speaker had to say about your 'corrections';

blindswelledrat said:

dandarez said:

kapiteinlangzaam said:

dandarez said:

What a f. liberalising sthole this country has become

Dont froth too much, it's your generation that has fked it!!

Yeah.
That's what all 'young people' today say.

Wish I could take you back, it was the most fking brilliant of time. You sure you ain't envious?
Difference too was that we respected our elders.
Probably why we learnt so much. Like punctuation and spelling...
Don't needs an apostrophe, and one exclamation mark suffices, no need for two.

That's like having your English corrected by a brain damaged chimp.

I found that funny. And accurate.

[jjlynn27]

crankedup said:

Nope, definitely not my property is all I can say.

I'd imagine that everyone on PH would instantly recognize the house;

[jjlynn27]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

You'd think that, wouldn't you?

[andymadmak]

jjlynn27 said:

crankedup said:

Nope, definitely not my property is all I can say.

I'd imagine that everyone on PH would instantly recognize the house;

Everyone, why?

FBDO (the movie ) dates to the mid eighties, so some Phers won't have even been born at that time, let alone been old enough to watch the film.
The car though, now that's something a bit special. Not often you see a Lambo in that colour...

[Smiler.]

jjlynn27 said:

Smiler. said:

jjlynn27 said:

You who, while looking at the picture with the Ferrari and a house from one of the most famous movies of all time, you who find the bag interesting, you thought that woman with the bag is me? Your first thought when you see a picture of a random woman, is 'she looks like she seems to be permanently on her period'?

Not odd at all.

Keep digging.

Are you ok?

Most people would, and do, comment on the car and/or the house. You should be fine with the fact that you were drawn to the bag to the exclusion of everything else. You don't need to be defensive about it.
What is more disturbing, is that you see the woman in the picture and your reaction is that 'she seems to be permanently on her period'.
When you go outside, hopefully closely supervised, do you think that about every woman that goes by, or just women with particular bags?

Curious to see which Kray wannabe is going to jump (this is, obviously, a figure of speech) to your defence.

You are proving my assertion perfectly.

As for the bold, you're asking me if I'm ok?

Just give it up.

[jjlynn27]

Smiler. said:

jjlynn27 said:

Smiler. said:

jjlynn27 said:

You who, while looking at the picture with the Ferrari and a house from one of the most famous movies of all time, you who find the bag interesting, you thought that woman with the bag is me? Your first thought when you see a picture of a random woman, is 'she looks like she seems to be permanently on her period'?

Not odd at all.

Keep digging.

Are you ok?

Most people would, and do, comment on the car and/or the house. You should be fine with the fact that you were drawn to the bag to the exclusion of everything else. You don't need to be defensive about it.
What is more disturbing, is that you see the woman in the picture and your reaction is that 'she seems to be permanently on her period'.
When you go outside, hopefully closely supervised, do you think that about every woman that goes by, or just women with particular bags?

Curious to see which Kray wannabe is going to jump (this is, obviously, a figure of speech) to your defence.

You are proving my assertion perfectly.

As for the bold, you're asking me if I'm ok?

Just give it up.

Still no answers? Ok. FWiW I think that you should be comfortable with your interests, even if you were probably the only person who would be fascinated by a handbag when looking at that picture.
The reason that I think that you are not quite ok, is the 'permanent period' comment based on a woman in a picture.

Then again, with you stalking people on the car forum, that question is rather rhetorical.

[crankedup]

jjlynn27 said:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

You'd think that, wouldn't you?

Still I have no knowledge of the property in question, why should I have ? Others have pointed to some movie film in which this property features?

[crankedup]

jjlynn27 said:

Smiler. said:

jjlynn27 said:

You who, while looking at the picture with the Ferrari and a house from one of the most famous movies of all time, you who find the bag interesting, you thought that woman with the bag is me? Your first thought when you see a picture of a random woman, is 'she looks like she seems to be permanently on her period'?

Not odd at all.

Keep digging.

Are you ok?

Most people would, and do, comment on the car and/or the house. You should be fine with the fact that you were drawn to the bag to the exclusion of everything else. You don't need to be defensive about it.
What is more disturbing, is that you see the woman in the picture and your reaction is that 'she seems to be permanently on her period'.
When you go outside, hopefully closely supervised, do you think that about every woman that goes by, or just women with particular bags?

Curious to see which Kray wannabe is going to jump (this is, obviously, a figure of speech) to your defence.

Faint whiff of ‘mirrored psychology’ being used in many posts jj.

[Smiler.]

jjlynn27 said:

Still no answers? Ok. FWiW I think that you should be comfortable with your interests, even if you were probably the only person who would be fascinated by a handbag when looking at that picture.
The reason that I think that you are not quite ok, is the 'permanent period' comment based on a woman in a picture.

Then again, with you stalking people on the car forum, that question is rather rhetorical.

Has my initial comment really vexed you that much?




Internet forums don't require the permission of it users to make posts. Anyone can post anything about anything to anyone (within reason).

You bang on about a car forum, but this thread is entitled "Gammon", & it's absolutely not about the police. So how is it "car related"?


Then, you make your usual play of labelling other users. Stalker?

Here's the thing. It's a public forum. Public in as much as it's freely visible to anyone & anyone can post one membership is approved (& after the time restriction in some areas). Unless you can direct me to the clause in the Ts & Cs where I need the permission of the forum weirdo to post.

It's patently obvious you don't understand humour, satire or wit, but then that's not a crime.

Schwing Batta

[jjlynn27]

crankedup said:

Still I have no knowledge of the property in question, why should I have ? Others have pointed to some movie film in which this property features?

I would consider knowing that part of general education for anyone whose knowledge of movies didn't end up with the introduction of talkies.