RE: Audi S2 | PH Used Review

RE: Audi S2 | PH Used Review

Friday 29th September 2023

Audi S2 | PH Used Review

A forgotten five-cylinder Audi that isn't without appeal - assuming you can find one...


Back then…

Succeeding an icon that remains revered decades later is never easy - ask any younger siblings. That was the main issue faced by the Audi S2 back in the early 1990s. Supplanting a car as legendary as the Quattro would never have been simple, but replacing angular '80s aggression with soap-bar '90s sleekness - even with a significant aerodynamic benefit - wasn’t a great start. There would be no factory motorsport programme to add glamour, no additional performance (220hp from the 2.2-litre turbocharged five), and the use of a name that evoked the recent days of Group B glory. Nowadays we all know the S badge as the understudy of the RS flagships, but this was years prior to uber Avants. Back then S2 followed S1, as in world rally superstar. The car after it was a £30k, leather lined, wood trimmed 2+2. Talk about a tough ask.

Autocar didn’t love the S2 much - ‘it lacks greatness’ summed up their thoughts succinctly. ‘Not only does it fail to improve on the Quattro’s legendary road manners, but it actually takes a step back’. Yikes. Motor magazine was more complimentary: ‘The S2 is versatile and blisteringly fast, all achieved with barely a mutter from the now civil and almost liquidly powerful five cylinders in conscientiously designed and constructed coachwork.’ As has become motoring journalism folklore, the newer car was declared worse for being more capable.

A 1993 facelift brought 10 extra horsepower and a six-speed manual, and the S2 was also available as a saloon and estate; the latter was of course the basis for the seminal RS2. Notable features included Bosch Servotronic speed-sensitive steering, a Torsen centre diff (plus a drive-operated locking rear diff) and a KKK-K24 turbo running at up to 0.75 bar. (The Sport Quattro has used a beefier K27 on this engine, among other things, to get beyond 300hp.)

Ultimately, however, not that many sold, in any bodystyle. An early '90s recession won’t have helped flagship two-doors (especially with the handsome new look available with more affordable engines), neither would the glut of alternatives in coupe-crazed times, and the Audi Coupe range petered out in 1996. The S2 badge was never seen again; the next five-cylinder coupe would be the TT RS more than a decade later, and the follow-up 2+2 on saloon underpinnings was the A5. Strange one.

Nowadays…

A caveat from the off: Audi’s heritage fleet S2 really is as museum-grade quality as it seems, with just 1,200 miles from new. So it’s not really representative of any other used example out there. Plenty might still look this good, however, and that really counts in its favour. The 80-based Coupe will never be as recognisable as the Ur-Quattro, sure, but in this car’s favour is a look that’s ageing supremely well because it never tried too hard. It’s confident and assured, restrained in the best fast Audi tradition because those who know, know pretty much instantly. The S2 remains a really handsome car, well-proportioned and smartly detailed. Or, as it would been back in the day, conservative and plain.

Similarly, the inside is a testament to the good old Audi days. It feels absolutely bombproof, more like you're travelling by submarine rather than anything so pathetically insulated as a car. Again some of that will be due to how little this one has been used, though the fact that those S2s that can be found for sale often sporting chunky six-figure mileages points to sturdy build quality. Everything thunks and clunks and whirrs expensively; great slabs of wood veneer sit perhaps a tad incongruously in a car of sporting intent, though they look great. Same for the leather. As so many modern classics feel delicate and almost vulnerable, even those with modest mileages, the S2 makes new cars seem flimsy. You’d use this, enjoy this and appreciate this as much as possible.

That toughness extends to the powertrain and, more broadly, the entire driving experience. This isn’t a dainty, touchy-feely kind of sports car, and it surely wasn’t even by the standards of the early '90s: the steering is remote (representing ‘dubious progress’ according to one contemporary report) and the sound surprisingly subdued. In place of a seat-of-the-pants feel, however, you get all-conquering, all-consuming cross-country speed. Which feels like an adequate substitute. There won’t have been anything rear-wheel drive back then that would have been close to an S2, surely. This arrived a couple of years before even an Impreza Turbo, don’t forget.

Once 3,000rpm is on the dial, the S2 charges forward on a surge of boost and a real appetite for the red paint, feeling far stronger than 230hp shifting 1,400kg might have you believe. The gearbox is an unexpected highlight, too, again sturdy and reassuring but also accurate and satisfying. The ride feels decently resolved and the dimensions usefully compact in 2023, so before you know it the speed isn’t best matched with what we’re warned are old tyres. But even they have more purchase than might be expected, the front-end push isn’t terminal. Soon that red snout is rollicking down the next straight, snorting up the cool autumn air and politely bellowing its five-cylinder war cry out of appropriately modest pipes. Perhaps it’s a tad one-dimensional, but golly is it effective. Back when a hot hatch was a Clio 16v this must have felt supersonic.

Should you?

Tricky one. Because those after an old car for more thrills and involvement than a modern alternative might be a tad disappointed by the S2, because it doesn’t fizz with feel or turn every journey into an event. On the other hand, of course, it just works, and works really well, with the added advantages of cool '90s styling and a characterful powertrain in its favour.

Knowing that engine is eminently capable of greater things only increases the appeal, especially as the car it’s contained in feels more than up for the challenge. Something so unassuming and apparently so hardy with 300hp, 400hp, maybe even 500hp, would be a cool old classic. Especially with a bit more sound in the mix.

Trouble is getting one. ‘Twas ever thus with niche performance options from the '90s (or so it now appears), but seeking out an S2 in 2023 really is not the work of a moment. And because they were just so good at point A to point B in cool, calm, composed fashion - they must have made excellent estates even before the RS - the cars you’ll find today are often 150,000-milers. No doubt useable, if maybe not the cars to now be spending thousands on. Especially as values have inevitably strengthened of late.

That being said, any S2 you find will be significantly less money than a Quattro with the same engine, and we shouldn’t underestimate the five-pot's appeal. Even the coupe is reasonably practical, the quality beyond reproach, and the design arguably looks better by the day. Look elsewhere for excitement; for a five-cylinder fix a little different to the rest, the S2 is very easy to recommend.


SPECIFICATION | AUDI S2 (1991-1996)

Engine: 2,261cc, five-cyl turbo
Transmission: 5-speed manual, four-wheel drive (6-speed from 1993)
Power (hp): 220@5,900rpm (230 from 1993)
Torque (lb ft): 228@1,950rpm
0-62mph: 5.7 secs (claimed)
Top speed: 154mph
Weight: 1,420kg
MPG: 30ish
CO2: N/A
Price new: £30,033
Price now: £12k+

Author
Discussion

Lowtimer

Original Poster:

4,293 posts

181 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
"There won’t have been anything rear-wheel drive back then that would have been close to an S2, surely."
I think Porsche would very strongly disagree, and not just with the 911.

biggbn

26,563 posts

233 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Yes please, I love these. Proper old school Audi for which all the clichés apply. Bank vault doors, coal face cabin, sonorous engine, all weather, usable daily classic. I'm about to commit heresy here but I'd have one over the UR Quattro. There, I said it....

MDT

566 posts

185 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
0-60 in 5.7 seconds and 'only' 220bhp. I can't think of many modern cars that can do this? and at 1400kg it's not exactly a feather weight either.

This example is stunning.

howardhughes

1,203 posts

217 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Love it, and not a single iPad in sight. Loving those pressure gauge dials. A true blast from the past.

anonymous-user

67 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Lovely. I had an 80 from this era. Properly screwed together and classy. Unlike the plastic chav tat of modern Audis.

Ben Lowden

6,875 posts

190 months

PH Marketing Bloke

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
A great read to start the day, thanks Matt!

AmyRichardson

1,671 posts

55 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Not my thing but very cool, in a child-of-the-90s way. The last generation in which Audi seemed to be a company aside, doing it's own thing and not really in the BMW/MB race (and free from most of the 90s German car stereotypes.)

Not to sure it's the weapon the article makes out, I seem to remember an article in Car that had a 2.2 Prelude giving one a hard time (albeit in the dry) and nobody sings their praises as B-road lightning.

Its Just Adz

15,917 posts

222 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Look at that steering wheel, lovely.
Great looking car.

mooseracer

2,307 posts

183 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
biggbn said:
Yes please, I love these. Proper old school Audi for which all the clichés apply. Bank vault doors, coal face cabin, sonorous engine, all weather, usable daily classic. I'm about to commit heresy here but I'd have one over the UR Quattro. There, I said it....
I'm with you on that - always preferred these

cerb4.5lee

36,165 posts

193 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
I've always thought that these were stunning looking things. cool

I saw this at a show the other week and it was in lovely condition too.

GreatScott2016

1,784 posts

101 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
howardhughes said:
Love it, and not a single iPad in sight. Loving those pressure gauge dials. A true blast from the past.
Agree, the interior is fab but I've always disliked the shape of these.

MDMA .

9,509 posts

114 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Very nice. A good period mod for these was the Nothelle N300 conversion. Took it to RS2 territory.

Robertb

2,570 posts

251 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Lowtimer said:
"There won’t have been anything rear-wheel drive back then that would have been close to an S2, surely."
I think Porsche would very strongly disagree, and not just with the 911.
And BMW… M3 was out then.

Look at that interior though… absolutely fantastic.

Edited by Robertb on Thursday 28th September 08:04

Hubris

165 posts

150 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
I had a 90 quattro from a similar era.

It seemed to be chiseled from granite and I having the windows down most days, just to hear the engine.

They don't build them like that anymore.

biggbn

26,563 posts

233 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
AmyRichardson said:
Not my thing but very cool, in a child-of-the-90s way. The last generation in which Audi seemed to be a company aside, doing it's own thing and not really in the BMW/MB race (and free from most of the 90s German car stereotypes.)

Not to sure it's the weapon the article makes out, I seem to remember an article in Car that had a 2.2 Prelude giving one a hard time (albeit in the dry) and nobody sings their praises as B-road lightning.
Prelude was a great b road car, light on its feet and with 4ws, always felt planted, lithe, agile. Doesn't surprise me that the Audi couldn't just drive away.

CedricN

838 posts

158 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
In the beginning of the 2000s these were everywhere at drag racing events, street racing (was quite big thing here in Sweden) and as a tuner car/modded car in general. Try find an original one today, almost impossiblesmile

carinaman

22,827 posts

185 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Not forgotten.

On release I think CAR Magazine slated the steering and said it wasn't as much of a driver's car as the Quattro.


anonymous-user

67 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Very cool. I went looking for one to buy about 12-13 years ago and they were thin on the ground back then. I ended up with a late 2.8 80 Cabrio. It felt solid as a rock and looked right from every angle - much like this coupe.

I’m going to start looking again smile

LotusOmega375D

8,489 posts

166 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
Back in the mid 1990s I worked for a company whose MD’s son was given one of these as a company car. He was a typical self-made multi-millionaire’s son, who had been handed everything on a plate, including a Director’s job at the company. In comparison we had to make do with company Vauxhall Astra 1.7D non turbo Merits, but I had a 185bhp Renault 5 Turbo 2 as a fun car, so knew about performance.

One day, the guy asked me if I would take his S2 to the dealer for a service. As soon as I was out of sight, I gave it the beans, but it was so disappointing. No really savage acceleration, more a brisk gathering of speed and, as the article says, you feel completely separated from the outside world. Civilised, but certainly not involving and dramatic like its proper quattro forbear, which I enjoyed later as a passenger blasting from speed camera to speed camera around the North Circular!
biggrin

I never even liked the looks of the S2 coupe so it’s a No from me.

AmyRichardson

1,671 posts

55 months

Thursday 28th September 2023
quotequote all
biggbn said:
Prelude was a great b road car, light on its feet and with 4ws, always felt planted, lithe, agile. Doesn't surprise me that the Audi couldn't just drive away.
That rings a lot of bells - flowing & confidence inspiring vs. thuggish "go!"