Interest rates

Author
Discussion

andy c

Original Poster:

1,216 posts

194 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
Is it me being overly cautious thinking we are about to get a big shock with the rates? I am no expert but whilst on the verge of taking a big plunge,I am very concerned with what the rates will do.
If I took any notice of the doom mongers on www.debtbombshell.com , or www.housepricecrash.com or the various threads on here and elsewhere,I am pretty damned spooked!!!

This is what the experts say and forecast.

From This is money:

Swap markets reflect the City's bank rate expectations. They price in rates to be 1.25% by late summer 2011. Latest: Various forecasting bodies have made upbeat prediction for the economy in recent weeks - the NIESR (9 April) and the CEBR on 16 April. The markets began factoring in a slightly higher chance of rate rises but that soon evapourated with forecasts of rates in five years at a new 2010 low.

Opinion: Inflation is a concern, but there's good reasons why rates will remain lowI've listed some historic swap rate prices to show how the market moves as economic prospects shift. Broadly speaking, the chances of a rate rise have receded since the start of the year:


January 26 (weak economy figures)
• 1.67% in two years
• 3.05% in five years
Source: Bloomberg

January 28 (inflation warning)
• 1.78% in two years
• 3.16% in five years


February 10 (downbeat BoE inflation report)
• 1.59% in two years
• 3.01% in five years

February 17 (3.5% inflation announced)
• 0.94% in one year
• 1.58% in two years
• 3.01% in five years


March 5 (Day after rates were held)
• 0.89% in one year
• 1.68% in two years
• 2.99% in five years

March 11 (after inflation survey)
• 0.87% in one year
• 1.64% in two years
• 2.97% in five years

March 30 (UK economy better than expected)
• 1.05% in one year
• 1.59% in two years
• 2.88% in five years

April 13
• 1.06% in one year
• 1.61% in two years
• 2.94% in five years

April 16
• 1.03% in one year
• 1.55% in two years
• 2.88% in five years

April 20 (After surprise inflation rise)
• 1.05% in one year
• 1.59% in two years
• 2.92% in five years



Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/interest-rates#ixzz0l...

Dave_ST220

10,302 posts

206 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
What is the big plunge you are about to take?

andy c

Original Poster:

1,216 posts

194 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
Mortgage,what else

Jon C

3,214 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
3% is a big shock? Blimey, when I bought my first flat they were >14%

fido

16,844 posts

256 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
Jon C said:
3% is a big shock? Blimey, when I bought my first flat they were >14%
But you probably took it out when rates were 7%. When most of your monthly payment is made up of interest, then it's going to hit you alot harder.

Jon C

3,214 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
fido said:
Jon C said:
3% is a big shock? Blimey, when I bought my first flat they were >14%
But you probably took it out when rates were 7%. When most of your monthly payment is made up of interest, then it's going to hit you alot harder.
Nope, mine was an interest only plus endowment. I dont have it to hand, but I think the rate quoted on the first statement was 14.6%

jshell

11,069 posts

206 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
Just fixed at 4.5% APR for 5 years as I had to change deals and I think that after a year rates will go steadily up. Also the bank product prices are often overlooked, they're not tied into the BoE rate completely. I think product prices (true cost of mortgage) will rise steadily.

Dave_ST220

10,302 posts

206 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
andy c said:
Mortgage,what else
I was talking more about figures.

andy c

Original Poster:

1,216 posts

194 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
Jon C said:
3% is a big shock? Blimey, when I bought my first flat they were >14%
Only 3% would be a result! My rate was 16% in the 90s.I was 2 over base then.Its the double digit rates I am concerned with.

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

243 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
Low for years is my guess. First Direct are doing 1.89% over base.

cymtriks

4,560 posts

246 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
andy c said:
Jon C said:
3% is a big shock? Blimey, when I bought my first flat they were >14%
Only 3% would be a result! My rate was 16% in the 90s.I was 2 over base then.Its the double digit rates I am concerned with.
But back in the eighties eight percent with a high of double that was normal and house prices and lending criteria reflected that

Today house prices and lending criteria for a long time have reflected sub five percent rates. Most peoples mortgages reflect this.

So...

Eight percent now would be as devastating to mortgage payers and the housing market as sixteen was back then.


M-J-B

15,000 posts

251 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
I think it's important to remember a mortgage is ordinarily a long term commitment and you can't make a decision to commit based on an assumed rate over a three or five year period.

It's very likely that interest rates will increase over the next X years to 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or even higher (we just don't know what's around the corner!), but just as they rise they will at some time fall.

From memory over the last 25 years the average mortgage interest rate is somewhere around 11% (I stand to be corrected) and if you are hedging your bets against a 3% interest rate - don't commit to a mortgage, or understand the process and be done with it.

That is unless I don't understand the OP's thoughts here?

cymtriks

4,560 posts

246 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
M-J-B said:
From memory over the last 25 years the average mortgage interest rate is somewhere around 11%
That was some time ago. Every successive year of low rates brings that average down. I have seen seven percent quoted for 1985 to 2010. The very long term average is closer to six percent though this does go back to times that are not really comparable to today.

The longer rates stay low the less likely they are to climb high quickly. Everyone (who actually has a significant mortgage) thinks that rates under five percent are normal and that much over that is "high". Trouble in the eighties was when rates climbed into double figures, trouble now, after over a decade of very low rates, will start at five percent. Politicians will do everything they can to avoid this trouble.

-Pete-

2,896 posts

177 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
The annual average since I bought my first house is around 7% and my peak was 15.4%, and I think most intelligent people are fairly certain they will rise after the election. The Bank of England are supposed to use interest rates to control inflation and keep it under 2%, it's currently 3.4%-4.4% depending which measure you believe, although for most of us it's probably higher.

I'd expect most mortgages to be 6-8% next year, but who knows, maybe the taxpayer will continue to subsidise the BTL tycoons and over-stretched whilst punishing the pensioners and other savers? After all, life isn't fair!

cymtriks

4,560 posts

246 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
-Pete- said:
I'd expect most mortgages to be 6-8% next year
You are ignoring the people who control this rate. Politicians.

Rates that high will have the same effect today that rates of 15 percent had twenty years ago.

Consider:

1990 50K mortgage at 10 percent - in trouble at 15 percent
2010 125K mortgage at 4 percent - in trouble at 6 percent

Older people often think that high rates are 15 percent because that is what high means in the first example. However, high today is the second example, after a decade of low rates and easy lending six percent is very high!!!

Politicians may pretend this isn't true but they know that if they are tarred with the "repossesions" brush then they will be out for three terms.

They won't allow that to happen.

-Pete-

2,896 posts

177 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
I'm fixed until end of term so it doesn't affect me, but I expect mortgages to be 6-8% because I expect BoE to be forced to raise base rates to 4-6% to control inflation and support Sterling. After the election, there's going to be a lot of changes, whoever wins, and lending money at less than the rate of inflation can't continue IMO.

Fittster

20,120 posts

214 months

Thursday 22nd April 2010
quotequote all
cymtriks said:
Older people often think that high rates are 15 percent because that is what high means in the first example. However, high today is the second example, after a decade of low rates and easy lending six percent is very high!!!

Politicians may pretend this isn't true but they know that if they are tarred with the "repossesions" brush then they will be out for three terms.

They won't allow that to happen.
Politicians might not have that amount of control over interest rates, ask the PM of Greece.

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

243 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
cymtriks said:
The longer rates stay low the less likely they are to climb high quickly.
Don't understand this?

cymtriks

4,560 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
NoelWatson said:
cymtriks said:
The longer rates stay low the less likely they are to climb high quickly.
Don't understand this?
People get used to low rates for 15 years.
Loans get taken out at low rates for 15 years
Lending criteria reflects low rates for 15 years

After 15 years a six percent rate becomes as damaging to the house market and the economy as sixteen was 20 years ago.

The electorate and politicians still remember the late eighties and early nineties as a time of high rates, bad politicians and repossions.

The longer rates stay low the more political will there will be to keep them low. If they can't keep them low then the next best thing is let them grow slowly.

What it really boils down to is how much are politicians willing to do, or capable of doing, to stay in their jobs.

Dave_ST220

10,302 posts

206 months

Friday 23rd April 2010
quotequote all
Also, a lot of offset/fixed rates are still over 4% when base is 0.5%, i think lenders will find it hard to justify having the same gap should base be 5% for example. IIRC when i first got my mortgage base was much higher yet the gap between that & the rate we were paying was much smaller.

Still, if you aren't pricing in big increases when taking out the loan then you are on risky ground.

The way some on here go on it would seem a rate increase of just 2% would cripple people.

Who in their right mind thinks rates will stay low for the period of a 25 year loan?