Gambling Commission charges 15 with G E betting offences
Gambling Commission charges 15 with G E betting offences
Author
Discussion

Rufus Stone

Original Poster:

10,293 posts

72 months

scenario8

7,161 posts

195 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
Stewie must be in a meeting as this sort of thing really used to be his bag so I’ll get in early to say (pending convictions, naturally) these guys are proper eejits.

Glad they clarified this Jeremy Hunt isn’t the one we all know and love.

Edited to add a link from dear Auntie (who must be salivating at the prospect of further bad boy Tory stories)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c230pvpdek9o


Edited by scenario8 on Monday 14th April 12:52

donkmeister

10,408 posts

116 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
Obviously those using that insider knowledge are in the wrong, but perhaps this should also be a lesson that accepting bets on things where the outcome is pre-determined is a stupid idea.

MrBogSmith

3,421 posts

50 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
Nice to see action taken (assuming he's guilty).

I wonder if the US will be so prudent when it comes to those allegedly benefiting greatly from the stock market volatility.


sugerbear

5,385 posts

174 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
What are the odds of them being convicted?

bitchstewie

59,130 posts

226 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
Stewie must be in a meeting as this sort of thing really used to be his bag so I’ll get in early to say (pending convictions, naturally) these guys are proper eejits.
I was indeed.

I particularly liked the statement from the Conservative Party spokesperson that the party "believes that those working in politics must act with integrity".

Thanks for stepping in thumbup

AyBee

10,893 posts

218 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
How thick do you have to be to think you can get away with something like this?

eliot

11,899 posts

270 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
isn't publishing their date of births a bit of a no no?

AyBee

10,893 posts

218 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
eliot said:
isn't publishing their date of births a bit of a no no?
So is insider trading, but that didn't seem to stop them...

S600BSB

6,669 posts

122 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
AyBee said:
How thick do you have to be to think you can get away with something like this?
Pretty standard for the Conservative Party tbh.

Vanden Saab

16,232 posts

90 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
MrBogSmith said:
Nice to see action taken (assuming he's guilty).

I wonder if the US will be so prudent when it comes to those allegedly benefiting greatly from the stock market volatility.
We are expecting a knock on the door as we put a few thousand into US stocks the night before the recovery. bounce

milesgiles

2,490 posts

45 months

Monday 14th April
quotequote all
How stupid do you have to be to not just ring a mate to put it on for you

MrBogSmith

3,421 posts

50 months

Tuesday 15th April
quotequote all
Vanden Saab said:
MrBogSmith said:
Nice to see action taken (assuming he's guilty).

I wonder if the US will be so prudent when it comes to those allegedly benefiting greatly from the stock market volatility.
We are expecting a knock on the door as we put a few thousand into US stocks the night before the recovery. bounce
Nice.

It timed well with the ISA allowance refreshing.







119

12,426 posts

52 months

Tuesday 15th April
quotequote all
milesgiles said:
How stupid do you have to be to not just ring a mate to put it on for you
And this is exactly the sort of thing that makes the tories unelectable as it stands.



Pupp

12,528 posts

288 months

Tuesday 15th April
quotequote all
119 said:
milesgiles said:
How stupid do you have to be to not just ring a mate to put it on for you
And this is exactly the sort of thing that makes the tories unelectable as it stands.
What, like Trump was across the pond?

Suppose we’ll have to wait and see…

DeejRC

7,732 posts

98 months

Tuesday 15th April
quotequote all
How much did these folks make?
I mean, I’m kinda presuming the bets weren’t just for a tenner?

AyBee

10,893 posts

218 months

Tuesday 15th April
quotequote all
DeejRC said:
How much did these folks make?
I mean, I’m kinda presuming the bets weren’t just for a tenner?
I don't think they were huge amounts and the odds weren't great at 5:1. I mean, it's not like bets are traceab....oh!

gazza285

10,518 posts

224 months

Tuesday 15th April
quotequote all
119 said:
And this is exactly the sort of thing that makes the tories unelectable as it stands.
If you don’t vote for a political party because some of them commit fraud, then you won’t have much to choose from come the next election.

hairykrishna

14,064 posts

219 months

Tuesday 15th April
quotequote all
DeejRC said:
How much did these folks make?
I mean, I’m kinda presuming the bets weren’t just for a tenner?
I don't know what they all were but one reported the other day was only 100 quid.

It's depressing that they're not even any good at being corrupt.

DeejRC

7,732 posts

98 months

Tuesday 15th April
quotequote all
So, basically, it’s the bath plug on expenses level of naff’ness again?
You have to hand it to UK politicians, they really do know how to make utter tits out of themselves.