Wrongly accused teacher acquitted.

[Frankeh]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/87902...

Social services even had to be present at his own childs birth. What an absolutely absurd situation.
What was he going to do, give it a little molest while no one was looking.

This is why I could never work with kids. It's just not worth the risk of one little scrote going through a bad stint of puberty and deciding to ruin you.

[Frankeh]

Adrian W said:

He must be able to sue the school, cps and social services,

Not being able to see his newborn for the first 8 months of its life? Surely terms to sue under.
That's an important time for bonding and such.

If I was him I'd be claiming I couldn't feel attached/couldn't love to my baby because I felt removed. Bam, compensation out the wazoo.

[Frankeh]

Making him sign an agreement saying he can't see his family seems way way OTT here.
Deserves some kind of compensation, imo. Totally vindictive behaviour.

The accusations didn't even sound that bad. A pat on the arse, a rubbed back, cheek to cheek. It's hardly violent sexual assault, is it.

Certainly not the kind of thing you'd stop someone seeing their newly formed family over.

[Frankeh]

thinfourth2 said:

I'm sure that if the inital case had been reported here you would be calling for his balls to be cut off before being shot.

You really don't know me if you think that.