Jesus may have visited UK
Discussion
Wasn't the UK formed in about 1800 or something?
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20091125/tuk-jesus-may...
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20091125/tuk-jesus-may...
I was really commenting on the apparent blatant misuse of the term 'United Kingdom' rather than any religious stuff. I remember getting a massive bking for writing 'UK' as part of a History essay (becasue I couldn't be bothered to find out which specific country someone tried to invade).
If it's true that the term didn't even exist before 1707, then I ask you what kind of education have these 'journalists' had?
If it's true that the term didn't even exist before 1707, then I ask you what kind of education have these 'journalists' had?
KANEIT said:
Bill said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
who was the pope that Jesus wrote to?
IndeedIsn't that equivalent to someone today writing of something that *apparently* happened in about 1400?
FourWheelDrift said:
OnTheOverrun said:
FourWheelDrift said:
OnTheOverrun said:
I'm surprised this is suddenly news. I thought it was common knowledge/legend that Jesus travelled with Joseph of Arimathea, a wealthy sanhedrin and trader to Cornwall to buy tin. This was a fairly common Phoenician trade route at the time so it's not inconceivable, especially as we only know about 30 of Jesus' 33 years of life so he had plenty of time for a few trips.
Mythology is a word that doesn't mean true FourWheelDrift said:
In the same way someone studying Wizards and Magic reads Harry Potter books
But surely you can't study the Bible for several years and still come to the conclusion it's all true?I'm pretty sure I must be missing something with religion, and I wish I knew what it was. I'd love to be a Christian, and feel persecuted because I have apparently not been given the ability to be one. I will be extremely upset if I end up in hell (which knowing my luck I will).
My Great Great Grandad was a Methodist Minister, as is my Father in Law. Still, I truly don't understand it all. Stories like this just confuse me even more...then there's Richard Dawkins - who doesn't help matters.
FourWheelDrift said:
dr_gn said:
But surely you can't study the Bible for several years and still come to the conclusion it's all true?
I don't know how anyone reading any part of the bible can believe any of it is true, let alone all of it.Halb said:
dr_gn said:
Langweilig said:
Union of the Crowns -Scotland & England 1603.United Kingdom 1802. Union between Scotland, England & Ireland (Wales is a principality).
Excellent. I was only 2 years out then.Acts of Union 1707
Edited by Halb on Friday 27th November 14:13
So maybe I wasn't even 2 years out?
Digga said:
dr_gn said:
G_T said:
Digga said:
rs1952 said:
Now post some photos of the centre of Merthyr Tydfil
I spent my first four years of The pic above is, I think, taken with the old A5 visible on the other side of lake (Llyn Ogewn?), towards Devil's Kitchen. Noth great views - not my pics.
FourWheelDrift said:
Test of Time is not an accepted proof of the existence of biblical characters and events. All Rohl did was use Old Testament stories to identify possible historical characters, by shifting time lines by up to 400 years in some cases to match events up. Archaeologists and historians have rubbished it.
I place it alongside The Da Vinci Code in terms of accuracy.
What? The DaVinci Code's true: it must be because it had Tom Hanks in it.I place it alongside The Da Vinci Code in terms of accuracy.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff