Discussion
Good thread revival
https://blackandwhitefire.com/
This looks like a good stab at a UK calc (nothing to do with me, i picked it up from a reddit post) - challenge as always is trying to figure out what budget i might want/need at retirement
https://blackandwhitefire.com/
This looks like a good stab at a UK calc (nothing to do with me, i picked it up from a reddit post) - challenge as always is trying to figure out what budget i might want/need at retirement
James Shack has just done a video that some may find useful.
https://youtu.be/S9y8tsaZ3b4?si=aifigM9KTU8VIeex
https://youtu.be/S9y8tsaZ3b4?si=aifigM9KTU8VIeex
fat80b said:
WayOutWest said:
I've been experimenting by jacking up salary sacrifice pension contributions progressively each couple of months (e.g. 20-30-40-50%) to see how little I can comfortably survive on.
But you'd be amazed how much you are being robbed in income tax and NICs, so the hit to your take home pay is often a lot less than you might think.
It's even better if your employer chucks in some of the employer NICs they've saved - but this really does vary from employer to employer.
If you are not planning on FIREing before 55 anyway it is a no brainer to use an SS pension over ISAs, unless you can afford to max out both.
This is kindof where I find myself almost by accident - I have the option of taking *any amount of salary sacrifice and they will pay the 13.8% NI into my pension as well. After putting a spreadsheet together and modelling the options, I'm sacrificing almost the max amount I can per year into the pension.But you'd be amazed how much you are being robbed in income tax and NICs, so the hit to your take home pay is often a lot less than you might think.
It's even better if your employer chucks in some of the employer NICs they've saved - but this really does vary from employer to employer.
If you are not planning on FIREing before 55 anyway it is a no brainer to use an SS pension over ISAs, unless you can afford to max out both.
It makes paying off the mortgage seem like a very poor idea when you can have 2.4 x as much money in your pension instead!
I think this means that I am FIREing by accident.
Edited by fat80b on Tuesday 14th May 20:27
Effectively half my salary was either going into savings/pensions/mortgage payments.
By the time I retired, I only had half the income but didn't need to save anymore so there was no drop in living standard.
Olivera said:
It's curious that FIRE used to imply retiring very early (30s or 40s), now it's for people saving diligently to retire in their 50s, about the same age that boomers retired without a care in the world, and with f
k all personal provision (DB schemes) ![biggrin](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
![biggrin](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
FIRE is now just being able to retire. Not early. Not with a big pension. Just being able to stop working before you die....
Olivera said:
It's curious that FIRE used to imply retiring very early (30s or 40s), now it's for people saving diligently to retire in their 50s, about the same age that boomers retired without a care in the world, and with f
k all personal provision (DB schemes) ![biggrin](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
Remember historically it used to also involve a lot of people who earned massive salaries (often in tech) but then "stopped working" but setup a "side hustle" of a blog telling everyone how easy FIRE is if you can just invest 90% of your $2M salary during one of the longest and best bull runs in history for 10 years.![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
![biggrin](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
The principles apply to everyone but the reality is a bit different for most people.
For me FIRE isn't related to age, it's the combination of reducing your expenses FOR LIFE to way below societal average, in combination with an above average income leading to an earlier retirement than average.
The frugality reducing expenses below average thing seems to have been lost and FIRE adopted by those who simply want to retire in their 50s on the back of rampant HPI
Even the likes of MMM are out there buying brand new cars.
The frugality reducing expenses below average thing seems to have been lost and FIRE adopted by those who simply want to retire in their 50s on the back of rampant HPI
Even the likes of MMM are out there buying brand new cars.
lizardbrain said:
For me FIRE isn't related to age, it's the combination of reducing your expenses FOR LIFE to way below societal average, in combination with an above average income leading to an earlier retirement than average.
The frugality reducing expenses below average thing seems to have been lost
Maybe because they realised it was an utterly depressing way to live, and if you're only here once (which we likely are!) then you may as well make the most of the world and enjoy the relatively short time you have. The frugality reducing expenses below average thing seems to have been lost
I think the key thing around FIRE now is avoiding lifestyle creep as much as possible, however that presents at the salary level of said person. Doesn't mean you can't still live a fairly pleasant life if you're a higher earner of course.
But I think on lower salaries it wouldn't be a lifestyle many would find enjoyable, and because you've restricted yourself for so long, when you do finally call it a day, because you've sat in your bedroom for 15 years are you going to have the first idea how to spend all this new found time? Perhaps not![biggrin](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
But I think on lower salaries it wouldn't be a lifestyle many would find enjoyable, and because you've restricted yourself for so long, when you do finally call it a day, because you've sat in your bedroom for 15 years are you going to have the first idea how to spend all this new found time? Perhaps not
![biggrin](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
Edited by okgo on Thursday 23 May 12:26
Condi said:
Maybe because they realised it was an utterly depressing way to live, and if you're only here once (which we likely are!) then you may as well make the most of the world and enjoy the relatively short time you have.
It's not clear which life you are stating is depressing.Living a frugal life, retiring early spending your healthy years with family going hiking etc
Or keeping the high paid job and cramming your holidays and family into the gaps
lizardbrain said:
Condi said:
Maybe because they realised it was an utterly depressing way to live, and if you're only here once (which we likely are!) then you may as well make the most of the world and enjoy the relatively short time you have.
It's not clear which life you are stating is depressing.Living a frugal life, retiring early spending your healthy years with family going hiking etc
Or keeping the high paid job and cramming your holidays and family into the gaps
There has to be a balance. I’m sure my kids would be delighted if we never went on holiday just so I can Jack work in early to travel.
And thats the key, I think you have to now be a high earner to still be able to do things AND be frugal. On a lower salary, being frugal could be entirely joyless, especially with a family, doing THINGS in the UK is expensive by and large.
Most people don't die young, so no point planning for that.
Most people don't die young, so no point planning for that.
Condi said:
Maybe because they realised it was an utterly depressing way to live, and if you're only here once (which we likely are!) then you may as well make the most of the world and enjoy the relatively short time you have.
Indeed. For most I would say FIRE is a bats![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Condi said:
Olivera said:
It's curious that FIRE used to imply retiring very early (30s or 40s), now it's for people saving diligently to retire in their 50s, about the same age that boomers retired without a care in the world, and with f
k all personal provision (DB schemes) ![biggrin](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
![biggrin](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
FIRE is now just being able to retire. Not early. Not with a big pension. Just being able to stop working before you die....
Olivera said:
For most I would say FIRE is a bats
t crazy scheme based on an utterly foolish interpretation of life's priorities. Or more likely just a flat out scam.
Depends how you end up there. I spent two years unemployed after University (amazing what graduating into a recession will do for you), As a consequence I've always tended to live below my means and put money away, as I hated having no free cash to go with the free time.![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
I have a perfectly enjoyable life, albeit I spend too much of it working (which I generally enjoy), but as a side effect have continued putting money away,
By most metrics I have probably achieved FI. I haven't done the RE (yet) but my goodness does it make work less stressful knowing it is entirely discretionary. Nothing like your outgoing manager warning your incoming manager not to annoy you.
FunkyCEO said:
Good thread revival
https://blackandwhitefire.com/
This looks like a good stab at a UK calc (nothing to do with me, i picked it up from a reddit post) - challenge as always is trying to figure out what budget i might want/need at retirement
That's really well designed.https://blackandwhitefire.com/
This looks like a good stab at a UK calc (nothing to do with me, i picked it up from a reddit post) - challenge as always is trying to figure out what budget i might want/need at retirement
Condi said:
lizardbrain said:
For me FIRE isn't related to age, it's the combination of reducing your expenses FOR LIFE to way below societal average, in combination with an above average income leading to an earlier retirement than average.
The frugality reducing expenses below average thing seems to have been lost
Maybe because they realised it was an utterly depressing way to live, and if you're only here once (which we likely are!) then you may as well make the most of the world and enjoy the relatively short time you have. The frugality reducing expenses below average thing seems to have been lost
Just not into shiny things.
loafer123 said:
FunkyCEO said:
Good thread revival
https://blackandwhitefire.com/
This looks like a good stab at a UK calc (nothing to do with me, i picked it up from a reddit post) - challenge as always is trying to figure out what budget i might want/need at retirement
That's really well designed.https://blackandwhitefire.com/
This looks like a good stab at a UK calc (nothing to do with me, i picked it up from a reddit post) - challenge as always is trying to figure out what budget i might want/need at retirement
https://www.gov.uk/early-retirement-pension/person...
Part time is a good balance. After stopping full time work at 49 the last 14 years have been 3 days per week. Also able to take unpaid time off so managed a few 2 or 3 month bike touring holidays. My current shift pattern is irregular in that sone series I work 6 days other weeks no shifts. So easy to fit in good hobby time while saving actual holidays for big breaks.
Not wealthy enough to have multiple foreign holidays but run 2 cars2 dogs and don't need to count pennies.
Not wealthy enough to have multiple foreign holidays but run 2 cars2 dogs and don't need to count pennies.
Gassing Station | Finance | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff