Housing estate design of the last 20yrs - why so bad?

Housing estate design of the last 20yrs - why so bad?

Author
Discussion

Tlandcruiser

2,789 posts

199 months

Sunday 14th July 2019
quotequote all
Saleen836 said:
Would the following have even been thought about 20yrs ago?...
Listening to the news on a Dorset radio station Friday, they said plans had been submitted by a developer to build a further 222 apartments in Ocean Village, Southampton. The plans only include 27 parking spaces which include 4 disabled, apparently residents can park elsewhere in the Ocean car-park via a paid for permit scheme. They want to build the apartment block on a currently in use car park!
My biggest gripe with stories like this will end up the following way though; the aparments are built and sold, soon the residients moan and complain over lack of parking....like the thousands of home owners who do not have off street parking and end up taking part in parking wars

blueg33

36,158 posts

225 months

Sunday 14th July 2019
quotequote all
Saleen836 said:
Would the following have even been thought about 20yrs ago?...
Listening to the news on a Dorset radio station Friday, they said plans had been submitted by a developer to build a further 222 apartments in Ocean Village, Southampton. The plans only include 27 parking spaces which include 4 disabled, apparently residents can park elsewhere in the Ocean car-park via a paid for permit scheme. They want to build the apartment block on a currently in use car park!
They might retain the parking underneath the building

Saleen836

11,142 posts

210 months

Sunday 14th July 2019
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
Saleen836 said:
Would the following have even been thought about 20yrs ago?...
Listening to the news on a Dorset radio station Friday, they said plans had been submitted by a developer to build a further 222 apartments in Ocean Village, Southampton. The plans only include 27 parking spaces which include 4 disabled, apparently residents can park elsewhere in the Ocean car-park via a paid for permit scheme. They want to build the apartment block on a currently in use car park!
They might retain the parking underneath the building
They might, but the planning application only specifies 27 parking spaces which is what the locals are up in arms about

GT03ROB

13,325 posts

222 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Saleen836 said:
Would the following have even been thought about 20yrs ago?...
Listening to the news on a Dorset radio station Friday, they said plans had been submitted by a developer to build a further 222 apartments in Ocean Village, Southampton. The plans only include 27 parking spaces which include 4 disabled, apparently residents can park elsewhere in the Ocean car-park via a paid for permit scheme. They want to build the apartment block on a currently in use car park!
Quite bonkers

Robertj21a

16,487 posts

106 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Programme on ch4 tonight as part of their 'Dispatches' - Britain's New Build Scandal. Apparently critical of Persimmon quality........

V8RX7

26,961 posts

264 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
It might be useful to keep some land - to grow food on !

V8RX7

26,961 posts

264 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
"Tons" of land -well that's all right then - how many tons of land do we need to feed our population ?


Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
It might be useful to keep some land - to grow food on !
That's OK. That'll be South Lincolnshire then, and nobody wants to live there anyway...

The only reason I ended up in Norfolk was 'cos I needed to be within striking distance of Boston, for business reasons, and North Norfolk was the nearest place I was actually willing to live.

V8RX7

26,961 posts

264 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Equus said:
V8RX7 said:
It might be useful to keep some land - to grow food on !
That's OK. That'll be South Lincolnshire then, and nobody wants to live there anyway...

The only reason I ended up in Norfolk was 'cos I needed to be within striking distance of Boston, for business reasons, and North Norfolk was the nearest place I was actually willing to live.
If that's the plan then we need a war / disease to eliminate around 90% of the population !

wink

blueg33

36,158 posts

225 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Plus not all land is suitable for food production but that land is also not suited to development

Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
If that's the plan then we need a war / disease to eliminate around 90% of the population !
yes

My favoured solution is to build a big wall around the inside hard shoulder of the M25, then close the Thames Barrier. Might as well concentrate on the bit that doesn't actually produce anything, just shuffles electronic numbers around the banking system, and consumes?



But yes, population is the elephant in the room that no government is willing to address.

Munter

31,319 posts

242 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Equus said:
But yes, population is the elephant in the room that no government is willing to address.
I know a number of people who watched Thanos kill 1/2 the population of the earth in the Avengers movies. And all agreed it's probably not the worst idea anybody's had to solve a number of problems.

blueg33

36,158 posts

225 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Thomas Malthus - your thread has arrived..................smile

Mark Benson

7,539 posts

270 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Equus said:
The only reason I ended up in Norfolk was 'cos I needed to be within striking distance of Boston, for business reasons, and North Norfolk was the nearest place I was actually willing to live.
You didn't fancy Notts then?

whistle

Robertj21a

16,487 posts

106 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Equus said:
That's OK. That'll be South Lincolnshire then, and nobody wants to live there anyway...

The only reason I ended up in Norfolk was 'cos I needed to be within striking distance of Boston, for business reasons, and North Norfolk was the nearest place I was actually willing to live.
In recent times, has anybody seriously suggested building a massive town/city (as, say, Milton Keynes) way out in the sticks ?.

Lincolnshire is an obvious choice but the necessary roads, and infrastructure generally, would make it very expensive. Then there's the grants etc to encourage firms to set up there.

Is it at all feasible, assuming it would have to be for, say, 0.5m people to really make it viable ?

cat with a hat

1,484 posts

119 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
cmvtec said:
Here's an example from near me, the development is quite a sought after and prestigious one (Christ knows why, it's built on a pit head), but it is a stones throw from the beach. This is one of the main roads through the development and leads to the school and shops, so has a fair amount of traffic.

Every property has at least one parking space and/or garage to the rear, most have two. Yet, the road at the front...



Plan view, where all the rear parking is visible...

That is bonkers.

No other way to put it.

Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Mark Benson said:
You didn't fancy Notts then?

whistle
Strangely not. biggrin

I did look at the nice bits of Lincolnshire (the Wolds) and Rutland, but Norfolk just happened to be the place where something suitable cropped up first.

Robertj21a said:
In recent times, has anybody seriously suggested building a massive town/city (as, say, Milton Keynes) way out in the sticks ?.

Lincolnshire is an obvious choice but the necessary roads, and infrastructure generally, would make it very expensive. Then there's the grants etc to encourage firms to set up there.
Yes, it crops up from time to time as a Planning idea.

Apart from the infrastructure (and anyone who has driven through the Lincolnshire Badlands on the A16 or A17 will know that the current road network is not even adequate for shifting cabbages), pretty much the whole lot of it is on borrowed time due to global warming and flood risk, so whilst the LPA's in the area use the Sequential Test to allow for enough housing to meet local demand, it would be difficult to make a case for locating a major settlement there.

blueg33

36,158 posts

225 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Interesting but not necessarily popular theories on population sustainability. He focuses on food, bu t I would include housing capacity too.



Robertj21a

16,487 posts

106 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Equus said:
Yes, it crops up from time to time as a Planning idea.

Apart from the infrastructure (and anyone who has driven through the Lincolnshire Badlands on the A16 or A17 will know that the current road network is not even adequate for shifting cabbages), pretty much the whole lot of it is on borrowed time due to global warming and flood risk, so whilst the LPA's in the area use the Sequential Test to allow for enough housing to meet local demand, it would be difficult to make a case for locating a major settlement there.
Thanks for that, I certainly agree about the A16 and A17.
What other areas might just be possible for a truly significant development ? - I'm thinking of mid Wales, parts of Lancashire, Staffordshire, Wiltshire, Northumberland etc

Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
cat with a hat said:
cmvtec said:
Here's an example from near me, the development is quite a sought after and prestigious one (Christ knows why, it's built on a pit head), but it is a stones throw from the beach. This is one of the main roads through the development and leads to the school and shops, so has a fair amount of traffic.

Every property has at least one parking space and/or garage to the rear, most have two. Yet, the road at the front...



Plan view, where all the rear parking is visible...

That is bonkers.

No other way to put it.
Classic PPG3, again.

This is a street on Charlie's vision for the future, Poundbury, which was held up as the model for all housing development and was the basis of PPG3:



Looks like a nice, twee market town, doesn't it?

And this is what goes on behind that nice street frontage, to prop up the parking requirments: