Do you need a TV licence if.....

Do you need a TV licence if.....

Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

85,838 posts

267 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Gold said:
If it wasn't plugged it and you never did so you wouldn't need a TV licence.
How would you prove you'd never used it? And if you never use it, why do you have it?

Fidgits

17,202 posts

231 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Gold said:
If it wasn't plugged it and you never did so you wouldn't need a TV licence.
How would you prove you'd never used it? And if you never use it, why do you have it?
as i said in my previous post... I cant see TV licensing saying "oh, your 42" plasma is unplugged, so you obviously never use it, so of course you dont need a license..."


it goes beg the question, why buy a TV if your not going to use it?

sleep envy

62,260 posts

251 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
surely it's up to them to prove you are using it

something about being innocent until proven guilty...

Plotloss

67,280 posts

272 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
SamHH said:
Fidgits said:
even if you didnt have the sky box, you'd still need a license for the TV even if it wasnt plugged in
I don't believe that.
well, a TV is capable of receiving TV signals - all TV's have tuners in them.
Define television.

OP has a PDP which is a commercial display, which wont have a tuner.

Simpo Two

85,838 posts

267 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
surely it's up to them to prove you are using it

something about being innocent until proven guilty...
shout If you own a fking reciever you need a fking licence. It doesn't get any simpler than that does it?

Fidgits

17,202 posts

231 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
surely it's up to them to prove you are using it

something about being innocent until proven guilty...
where have you been the last 10 years?

I think that went out with the rest of basic civil rights..

Plotloss

67,280 posts

272 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
sleep envy said:
surely it's up to them to prove you are using it

something about being innocent until proven guilty...
shout If you own a fking reciever you need a fking licence. It doesn't get any simpler than that does it?
You may think its that simple but it isnt.

You dont require a licence to own a television, just use one.

You can own a television and if it is obviously not in use you do not need a licence.

Fidgits

17,202 posts

231 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Fidgits said:
SamHH said:
Fidgits said:
even if you didnt have the sky box, you'd still need a license for the TV even if it wasnt plugged in
I don't believe that.
well, a TV is capable of receiving TV signals - all TV's have tuners in them.
Define television.

OP has a PDP which is a commercial display, which wont have a tuner.
i didnt realise the PDP's didnt have internal tuners? (at all?)

I think thats a different area then - as it doesnt have the reciever, though with the sky box he still needs a license, non?

sleep envy

62,260 posts

251 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
sleep envy said:
surely it's up to them to prove you are using it

something about being innocent until proven guilty...
shout If you own a fking reciever you need a fking licence. It doesn't get any simpler than that does it?
so using the same logic you have to have a licence to own a car?

Edited by sleep envy on Thursday 26th March 13:46

Fidgits

17,202 posts

231 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
Simpo Two said:
sleep envy said:
surely it's up to them to prove you are using it

something about being innocent until proven guilty...
shout If you own a fking reciever you need a fking licence. It doesn't get any simpler than that does it?
so using the same logic you have to have a license to own a car?
no, but you need a license to own a dog*...

even if you dont take it out for walks...

* though there is a chance that has changed...

Plotloss

67,280 posts

272 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
I think thats a different area then - as it doesnt have the reciever, though with the sky box he still needs a license, non?
Sky box is the key point here.

Sky report to TVL their list of subscribers.

Game over.

Fidgits

17,202 posts

231 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Fidgits said:
I think thats a different area then - as it doesnt have the reciever, though with the sky box he still needs a license, non?
Sky box is the key point here.

Sky report to TVL their list of subscribers.

Game over.
am i right in thinking the PDP is just a giant PC screen?

In which case i can see your argument (though would TV licensing? - I guess if you could prove you had no way to recieve TV signals they would)

Gold

1,998 posts

207 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Simpo Two said:
sleep envy said:
surely it's up to them to prove you are using it

something about being innocent until proven guilty...
shout If you own a fking reciever you need a fking licence. It doesn't get any simpler than that does it?
You may think its that simple but it isnt.

You dont require a licence to own a television, just use one.

You can own a television and if it is obviously not in use you do not need a licence.
yes There is nothing about having to have a TV licence to own a TV. Take a look on the TV licencing website. It's a mindfield of spin but nothing mentions having to have a licence to own a TV.

Cotty

39,716 posts

286 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
censored me doesn't anyone know how to use the internet
http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/information/index.jsp

"You must be covered by a valid TV Licence if you watch or record television programmes as they're being shown on TV. It makes no difference what equipment you use - whether it’s a laptop, PC, mobile phone, digital box, DVD recorder or a TV set - you still need a licence.

You do not need a TV Licence to view video clips on the internet, as long as what you are viewing is not being shown on TV at the same time as you are viewing it.

If you use a digital box with a hi-fi system, or another device that can only be used to produce sounds and can't display TV programmes, and you don't install or use any other TV receiving equipment, you don't need a TV Licence."

sleep envy

62,260 posts

251 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
no, but you need a license to own a dog*...

even if you dont take it out for walks...

* though there is a chance that has changed...
hehe

Plotloss

67,280 posts

272 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Its a tunerless display.

The way that TVL is driven is a big set of feeds from various places including retailers, warranty companies, cable and satellite providers.

When you buy a PDP/LCD without a tuner there is nothing beholden on the retailer to pass your details to TVL so when they do the mismatch search against the PAF you'll still be in the long list of addresses without a licence but you wont be in the target list of those with confirmed TV reception equipment and no licence.

esselte

14,626 posts

269 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Gold said:
Plotloss said:
Simpo Two said:
sleep envy said:
surely it's up to them to prove you are using it

something about being innocent until proven guilty...
shout If you own a fking reciever you need a fking licence. It doesn't get any simpler than that does it?
You may think its that simple but it isnt.

You dont require a licence to own a television, just use one.

You can own a television and if it is obviously not in use you do not need a licence.
yes There is nothing about having to have a TV licence to own a TV. Take a look on the TV licencing website. It's a mindfield of spin but nothing mentions having to have a licence to own a TV.
Yep there'll be loads of people who own tv's but don't use them....rolleyes...smile

Cotty

39,716 posts

286 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Or to put it another way "If you are blind or severely sight impaired, you can apply for a 50% concession on the cost of your TV Licence".

So even if you can't see the picture, you still have to pay.

SamHH

5,050 posts

218 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
shout If you own a fking reciever you need a fking licence. It doesn't get any simpler than that does it?
Fidgits said:
well, a TV is capable of receiving TV signals - all TV's have tuners in them.

So, having a TV means you need a license - otherwise whats to stop you unplugging it when TV licensing knocks on your door?

"oh no TV detector man, I have a TV, but its unplugged - look... i dont use it"...
Well, I know people who have televisions who don't pay the TV licence, legally, in the knowledge of the TV licensing agency and the TV licensing agency's website says that you can have a TV without paying the licence, so I still don't believe it.

esselte

14,626 posts

269 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
SamHH said:
Simpo Two said:
shout If you own a fking reciever you need a fking licence. It doesn't get any simpler than that does it?
Fidgits said:
well, a TV is capable of receiving TV signals - all TV's have tuners in them.

So, having a TV means you need a license - otherwise whats to stop you unplugging it when TV licensing knocks on your door?

"oh no TV detector man, I have a TV, but its unplugged - look... i dont use it"...
Well, I know people who have televisions who don't pay the TV licence, legally, in the knowledge of the TV licensing agency and the TV licensing agency's website says that you can have a TV without paying the licence, so I still don't believe it.
Do they actually use them? If not why do they have them?