Buying 6" of land from neighbours

Buying 6" of land from neighbours

Author
Discussion

Chrisgr31

13,512 posts

257 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
CaptainSlow said:
Would it help and would it be possible if they didn't extend the fence back?
Indeed wouldnt it just be simpler to move the fence back so the access way is available to both owners? One could put studs in to mark the boundary if necessary.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
pmanson said:
Won't they need to keep 1m of space between the extension and boundary for access?
Nice to have but not a planning requirement.

Dr Mike Oxgreen

Original Poster:

4,145 posts

167 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
Piglet said:
Why do you think you need to approach the Council?
Simply ignorance on my part! If the council are not involved then that simplifies things. smile

We'll be talking to the neighbours today, so I'll float the idea and see what reaction I get. I have a feeling they'll want the ability to park a car to the side of their new garage/extension, so they might not be willing to sacrifice much space.

I'll consider the idea of not having a fence at all, which would be the simplest idea by far. However it's not a future-proof solution: future owners might put a fence up anyway, meaning that we could no longer park our Hummer there. wink

There is a potential technical snag too. I believe there's some kind of soakaway running underground along the boundary, which I think our neighbours are currently responsible for. I don't know what the soakaway actually consists of, but I imagine it might make it impossible to move the boundary "only" six inches; we might have to move the boundary to completely include the soakaway and then it would presumably become our responsibility.

pmanson

13,387 posts

255 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
garyhun said:
pmanson said:
Won't they need to keep 1m of space between the extension and boundary for access?
Nice to have but not a planning requirement.
I thought the 2nd story had to be 1m back from the boundary? (Might be wrong i'm just thinking back to when my folks had an extension on a previous house)

Dr Mike Oxgreen

Original Poster:

4,145 posts

167 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
A couple of pictures might help. Our house is the one on the left. The angles are all a bit odd: their house is not quite parallel to ours.

The problem bit is where the front corner of our house makes the narrowest gap with the fence. It goes down to about 2.2m at that point, which sounds plenty but actually their garage is not quite in a straight line with the fence, so you've got to reverse in with half a wheel of steering lock on so the corners of a longer car would be at risk of scraping. Behind that point, there's plenty of space for most cars.

We've just popped round and rung the doorbell but got no reply. Eyeing things up, I'm not sure that they'd be able to get a car down the side of their new garage anyway, because the remaining space will taper significantly. Also, the plastic pipe that I presume is the opening of the soakaway is actually on our side of the fence, so I may be wrong about it being their responsibility!






(I know, sorry, worst "I've got a TVR" thread ever!)

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
pmanson said:
I thought the 2nd story had to be 1m back from the boundary? (Might be wrong i'm just thinking back to when my folks had an extension on a previous house)
You could be right - I was thinking ground floor only.

Dr Mike Oxgreen

Original Poster:

4,145 posts

167 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
Just had a chat, which went really well and I think we've got a potential solution we're both happy with.

They are indeed keen to park a car at the side of their new garage, so don't want to relinquish any space at that point. However, they would be willing to alter the angle of the existing fence such that there is no "kink". This would mean moving the front end of the fence by about 8 or 9 inches towards them, and would mean that there's no turn necessary when I'm backing in. The minimum width of 2.2m would remain, but without the kink I think that's wide enough for lots of cars.

This solution is probably doable without involving solicitors etc.

So, in the end this turned out to be simpler than I'd thought. Just goes to show that a quick chat with the neighbours can work wonders!

Thanks for everyone's help.

philmots

4,634 posts

262 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
I was going to say that after seeing the pictures.

It looks like its the slight bend that's causing the issue as you'll be watching your front end against the fence (assuming you're reversing in)

At least you've got a solution. It's better than nothing! Although, I don't see why they need to park a car down the side of the garage when they've got so much room out front!

With a bit of luck (for you) the extension will be made a bit too big resulting in dead space to the boundary. Then they may aswel move the fence a lot.

Lotusevoraboy

937 posts

149 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
How about doing away with the fence altogether? It's a bit high for a front boundary anyway and could result in both parties having easier access and more parking space.

Dr Mike Oxgreen

Original Poster:

4,145 posts

167 months

Monday 14th January 2013
quotequote all
Yes, that is a possibility. We'll wait until the work is all complete, except for the relaying of their driveway, then decide what to do with the boundary.

GraemeP

770 posts

231 months

Monday 14th January 2013
quotequote all
If you do move the boundary, use it as an opportunity to legally enforce the boundary position. You don't want to find your neighbour selling up, then the new owner finding out they could have more drive space due to the original boundary space being bigger (you won't believe some people). This is from someone who is in the middle of a legal boundary dispute that could cost lots of money (to both sides).