responsibility for joists in apartment building

responsibility for joists in apartment building

Author
Discussion

Portia5

Original Poster:

590 posts

25 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Dry rot was discovered in the floor below the bath in one of my flats.

It's also in the joists which are my bathroom floor joists and are the ceiling joists of the flat below.

Is the remedial work (and cost) the joint responsibility of the two flats to deal with as the joists are common to both apartments?

Edited by Portia5 on Saturday 11th May 10:34

Portia5

Original Poster:

590 posts

25 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Deeds are silent on the matter.

I'm pretty sure costs of joists between apartments are split 50/50 as the joists are jointly owned. Just not sure.

Edited by Portia5 on Saturday 11th May 10:46

Portia5

Original Poster:

590 posts

25 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
JerseyRoyal said:
Considering where the damage is, I’d imagine you’ll have a hard time convincing the downstairs neighbour that they’re liable.
.
Don't you think they should be liable for the maintenance of their ceiling joists?

Portia5

Original Poster:

590 posts

25 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
TownIdiot said:
Portia5 said:
Don't you think they should be liable for the maintenance of their ceiling joists?
I am a bit out of practice but I *think* the joists would be classed as the fabric of the building so wouldn't the freeholder of the building be responsible?
I'm also a bit out of practice, but I'm sure joists between properties are common property of the two properties which share them, and not the common property of others in the building.

I'm currently involved in remedying rising damp in another tenement building. The common owners are jointly responsible for the remedial works below the affected ground floor flat, but not for the remedial works within the flat itself.



Portia5

Original Poster:

590 posts

25 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Full disclosure 1): This is in Scotland where virtually all property is freehold. My (technically my wife's) apartment is one of 12 in the building which are a mixture of privately owned and HA owned. The HA are also the factors (managers) of the building and their management includes organising the comprehensive common buildings insurance policy which covers risks to both the individual dwellings and the common areas.

Full disclosure 2): I've already sorted it, accepting that the insurers may or may not pay out on the claim. I've also contacted the HA whose maintenance manager says it's above his pay grade to decide whether or not they can pay half the costs of the joist remedy and has referred me to their Director of Assets.

Next week I'll be sending her the full bhoona paperwork/pics/vids etc and then no doubt wait a few weeks for their committee to meet and decide on it.

Personally, I think the insurers will repudiate the claim.

More confident that the HA will share the costs (eventually).

O and here's a tiny extract from a Housing Tribunal hearing:

"...The Tribunal’s Decision:

The Tribunal have already determined that the joists are the property of the flats concerned and they not a common part of the tenement...."

Edited by Portia5 on Saturday 11th May 11:38

Portia5

Original Poster:

590 posts

25 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
Mr Pointy said:
.. it might be the two flats are jointly responsible for half the joist each.
That's my understanding.

Portia5

Original Poster:

590 posts

25 months

Saturday 11th May
quotequote all
AdamV12V said:
FWIW, I was the chairman of the board of a mgmt company (apointed through owning the penthouse there) for nearly 20years, not to mention working for 30+ yrs in a residential property lawfirm. So my comments on the leases etc... come with a degree of experience wink
How much experience do you have of Scots Law, property, or property management?