BMi sold to BA (or IAG)
Discussion
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16298167
I really like BMI. Fly with them at least once a month and never had any issue whatsoever.
Difficult to see where they have shed so much money. I can't recall a single flight I've been on that hasn't been full or near full.
I really like BMI. Fly with them at least once a month and never had any issue whatsoever.
Difficult to see where they have shed so much money. I can't recall a single flight I've been on that hasn't been full or near full.
StevieBee said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16298167
I really like BMI. Fly with them at least once a month and never had any issue whatsoever.
Difficult to see where they have shed so much money. I can't recall a single flight I've been on that hasn't been full or near full.
They are losing something like £35 per person on every flight, they may be full but at the wrong price.I really like BMI. Fly with them at least once a month and never had any issue whatsoever.
Difficult to see where they have shed so much money. I can't recall a single flight I've been on that hasn't been full or near full.
Elroy Blue said:
They don't want the airline, they want the landing slots. (According to those in the know)
bmi is currently very similar to what was British Mediteranean Airlines - lots of strange routes to the middle east! Bmed used to run these routes on behalf of BA, but BA ended the relationship and bmi bought Bmed - so I can't see BA being interested in the routes!toasty said:
I hope BA will move the BMI frequent flyer program over to theirs maintaining the same levels.
I'd prefer if they'd keep it a separate identity and stay Star Alliance. I've always flown BMI in preference to BA where possible, and Star Allicance over OneWorld since there's a Continental flight out of Edinburgh (my local airport) to Newark. I've been SA gold for ages mostly with miles racked up on domestics, but 3 or 4 US trips every year on Continental. If they change to BA/BA-miles then a) the domestic miles aren't so generous, and b) if I want the big luggage allowance on gold [mainly just the family's skis in the winter] I'd have to go through Heathrow
![frown](/inc/images/frown.gif)
Not sure what will happen on BMI Regional either as currently I use BMI for EDI-LHR, EDI-MAN and EDI-LBA - all of which currently rack-up SA points/miles. If mainline change to BA will regional stay SA?
I'd kind of hoped Virgin would pick them up and then join up as a SA partner.
Selfish perhaps just hoping to maximise convenience and free flights when there's folks who will be losing jobs soon I guess, but I guess whoever bought them would be making the same cuts irrespective. I never dod understand the loss-making part on domestics at least (apart from LBA!], the flights are pretty much always full.
cjs said:
This deal is bad news, it will mean less choice and will give BA a stranglehold on Heathrow slots, will end up pushing up prices no doubt. Would prefer that Virgin got it just to keep a bit more competition in the industry.
Yep agree with this. Heathrow flights from Scotland and North England are going to suddenly be very expensive I fearGassing Station | Holidays & Travel | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff