Cheeky but realistic low offers on houses / cars

Cheeky but realistic low offers on houses / cars

Author
Discussion

Noodle1982

2,103 posts

108 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Lots of angry people in this thread.

If I didn't do what I did I'd still be paying off a mortgage into my 30's. Just the thought of that should be enough to tempt anyone into my style of negotiating.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,804 posts

152 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
popeyewhite said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
He always had a choice. If Noodle had offered him £500 in cash for the house, the seller would obviously had said fk off. Even when you are completely desperate to sell, there's always a price you won't go below. Ultimately, Noodle's lowest offer was still acceptable.
No, they had to take it for fear of it dropping further.
They didn't have to do anything. No one had a gun to their head. If Noodle was holding a family member hostage, then I'd say that was below the belt, but to keep reducing your offer and saving £45K on a £115K house, no issue with that.
That's your appraisal when someone accepts £45K off a £115K house? They just felt like giving the buyer £45k off because they were nice people? rofl
No, they accepted an offer of £45K less because due to their desperate circumstances, it was still an acceptable offer.


TwigtheWonderkid

43,804 posts

152 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
schmalex said:
Wow. What an unscrupulous little st you are.

The first time you tried something like that on anything you were buying from me, you would have been soundly told to fk off and excluded from any process going forward.
Luckily for Noodle, he tried it on with someone who was desperate to sell, so couldn't adopt your high horse approach.

theguvernor15

947 posts

105 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
When we bought our first house, i looked at the sold price for the area & offered a lower (but realistic offer) on the property.
It was up for OIEI £215k, i looked up at the sold prices, factored in the property was in good order & that nothing had sold for a few years on the road & offerd £190k.
I was laughed at, anyway, we upped it eventually to £200k (begrudgingly from my point, however we could afford the mortgage comfortable so it wasn't an issue & it was the best in budget place we'd seen in 6 months of searching etc),

Mortgage company subsequently down-valued the property to £185k, the EA argued it was worth more, i disagreed & had a frank conversation with the EA, told them i wasn't paying anymore than that & that they should have the difficult discussion with their vendors that they'd overvalued & it wasn't worth what they claimed.
They argued a bit more, i said it was a final offer & would be looking for another property.

The next morning my offer was accepted.

schmalex

13,616 posts

208 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
schmalex said:
Wow. What an unscrupulous little st you are.

The first time you tried something like that on anything you were buying from me, you would have been soundly told to fk off and excluded from any process going forward.
Luckily for Noodle, he tried it on with someone who was desperate to sell, so couldn't adopt your high horse approach.
Why is my approach high horse? If someone chooses to fk me around, I’m under no obligation to deal with them

bigandclever

13,849 posts

240 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Noodle1982 said:
andymc said:
PositronicRay said:
Noodle1982 said:
The first house i bought was up for sale for 125k. Very little advertising of it and was in an area of very little foot traffic.Over the space of 3 months i made numerous offers, each one less than the one previously agreed.

I offered 115k. They accepted so i then offered 100k. They refused. A few weeks later when they hadnt had any other offers come in they agreed to the 100k, so i then offered them 90k. Fast forward a few weeks and same scenario so i then offered 80k

Long story short but i ended up getting it for 80k.

Numerous times i could see the estate agent on the verge of telling me to fk off every time i changed my offer but i knew the sellers wanted to get rid of the house as soon as possible and with them not having any other offers the metaphorical ball was in my court.


You sound a joy.

so you renegged your first offer?
I thought my post made it quite obvious. However, to answer your question...

I renegged my first, second, third and fourth offer.

At the time I wasn't actively searching for a house so if the seller or estate agent had told me where to go i wouldn't have lost any sleep over it.
I’ll be honest, I’m surprised the EA didn’t tell you to fk off and then do the deal themselves laugh

13aines

2,156 posts

151 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Schmed said:
In what situation would you pay over asking ? I'm guessing massively rising market / some kind of competitive bidding scenario ?

If 50k is 6% would make the house worth 833k then lol ? Either way must be in the South East smile
House was up for £225k, but went to best and final offers. We loved the house and the area, proximity to amenities etc. and couldn't find anything like it for sale in terms of character, and the fact that it's in the centre of town but tucked back, and is a house not a flat.

Paid around £238k. Someone offered 240k I believe but we were in a better position, and they liked that we were first time buyers who loved the house, so they accepted out offer.

Oxfordshire, btw.

DRFC1879

3,446 posts

159 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
I also negotiate multi-million pound deals for a living. Blah blah, powerfully built, something about custard etc.

The bit schmalex seems to be forgetting (wilfully?) here is one of the first rules of buying & selling (which comes way before crossing into negotiation).

Rule 1. Is this (a) A one-off transaction or do you want to (b) forge an ongoing relationship?

If (a) drive for the very best deal you can get for yourself and sod everything else. a win-win in this situation probably means you haven't done your job properly.

If (b) Consider the other party's stance, set out a field of play and try to guess where the overlapping area of what is acceptable to both parties (zone of potential agreement/ZOPA) lies. It doesn't matter where in that zone your final agreement sits, it's still an acceptable outcome that works for both parties going forwards.

A house purchase is firmly in scenario a. Well done, noodle.

schmalex

13,616 posts

208 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
13aines said:
Schmed said:
In what situation would you pay over asking ? I'm guessing massively rising market / some kind of competitive bidding scenario ?

If 50k is 6% would make the house worth 833k then lol ? Either way must be in the South East smile
House was up for £225k, but went to best and final offers. We loved the house and the area, proximity to amenities etc. and couldn't find anything like it for sale in terms of character, and the fact that it's in the centre of town but tucked back, and is a house not a flat.

Paid around £238k. Someone offered 240k I believe but we were in a better position, and they liked that we were first time buyers who loved the house, so they accepted out offer.

Oxfordshire, btw.
We paid over asking for ours in 2007

House was up for £600k and went to sealed bids. We loved the place but it was right at the top of our budget.

Back to my previous points about finding out the relative positions of everyone competing and the seller’s motivation, before submitting our final bid, I found out that:

1: The seller was desperate to go for personal reasons
2: We were the only offer that could proceed immediately (we were in rented, had a large deposit and MAIP)

I submitted a BAFO of £610k and made it abundantly clear that, if the seller wanted to get out of the headlines sharpish, ours was the only offer that allowed him to do that. We had no chain, would exchange as rapidly as the vendor wanted and would take vacant possession if necessary to enable them to move on quickly and quietly.

It was sphincter tighteningly expensive for us when we did bought it, but I’m so glad we did. 10 years on, it suits us perfectly and has probably close to doubled in value due to the work we’ve had done over that time

popeyewhite

20,216 posts

122 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
No, they accepted an offer of £45K less because due to their desperate circumstances, it was still an acceptable offer.
Exactly my point, thank you.

Changed your tune a bit from this
TwigtheWonderkid said:
They didn't have to do anything. No one had a gun to their head.
To this
TwigtheWonderkid said:
No, they accepted an offer of £45K less because due to their desperate circumstances
"Desperate cicumstances" that noodle-scumbag took as much advantage of as possible.




schmalex

13,616 posts

208 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
DRFC1879 said:
I also negotiate multi-million pound deals for a living. Blah blah, powerfully built, something about custard etc.

The bit schmalex seems to be forgetting (wilfully?) here is one of the first rules of buying & selling (which comes way before crossing into negotiation).

Rule 1. Is this (a) A one-off transaction or do you want to (b) forge an ongoing relationship?

If (a) drive for the very best deal you can get for yourself and sod everything else. a win-win in this situation probably means you haven't done your job properly.

If (b) Consider the other party's stance, set out a field of play and try to guess where the overlapping area of what is acceptable to both parties (zone of potential agreement/ZOPA) lies. It doesn't matter where in that zone your final agreement sits, it's still an acceptable outcome that works for both parties going forwards.

A house purchase is firmly in scenario a. Well done, noodle.
I’m absolutely not forgetting that part.

Had he said “I knew the property had been on the market for X years, so low balled an offer to see if they would take a kick in the nuts as I wasn’t actively looking anyway”, I would be the first person to congratulate him

However, he didn’t do that. The vendor agreed a price in good faith. He then reneged on that 3 times. He was lucky that the vendor was either too stupid or too desperate to tell him to GTFO.

That’s not “I win / you lose”, that’s “I’m a disingenuous

DRFC1879

3,446 posts

159 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
It is... but then the seller still had the choice to say "GTFO" when he came in with a lower offer. They didn't do that and must've had a reason. I'm the sort of person who likes to be liked but if I could save £90k over a mortgage term in return for a stranger who I would probably never meet again thinking I'm a bit of a tt... sign me up!

Shakermaker

11,317 posts

102 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
DRFC1879 said:
It is... but then the seller still had the choice to say "GTFO" when he came in with a lower offer. They didn't do that and must've had a reason. I'm the sort of person who likes to be liked but if I could save £90k over a mortgage term in return for a stranger who I would probably never meet again thinking I'm a bit of a tt... sign me up!
A stranger who knows where you live, don't forget wink

DRFC1879

3,446 posts

159 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
For £90k they could drive past my house and shout "CUUUUUUUNNNNNTTTTT" twice a day for all I care. wavey

bobtail4x4

3,740 posts

111 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
whats the betting they have another offer, and are using him as a backup just in case.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

257 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Noodle1982 said:
I had a feeling my experience would divide opinion.
"divide opinion" = you think it was fine, almost everyone else thinks you were a tt rofl

Jasandjules

70,027 posts

231 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
schmalex said:
That’s not “I win / you lose”, that’s “I’m a disingenuous
Indeed.

Once you have agreed a price you stick to it IMHO, unless you have stated "subject to survey" and the survey actually throws up an issue.

It seems many people have no honour or decency these days.

Integroo

11,575 posts

87 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Depends on the market and the product. Houses in Edinburgh for examples are going for as much as 10-30% OVER the asking price.

Makes buying a house an absolute nightmare as you need deposit + fees + whatever the over asking price is, in cash, as you'll only get a mortgage up to home report value.

Jasandjules said:
Indeed.

Once you have agreed a price you stick to it IMHO, unless you have stated "subject to survey" and the survey actually throws up an issue.

It seems many people have no honour or decency these days.
Worst part about the English housing market, and the best part about the Scottish housing market. In Scotland, if an offer is made and accepted, there is a binding contract at that point.

Edited by Integroo on Monday 16th July 18:52

Noodle1982

2,103 posts

108 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
Noodle1982 said:
I had a feeling my experience would divide opinion.
"divide opinion" = you think it was fine, almost everyone else thinks you were a tt rofl
Exactly. Divided opinion.

Jasandjules

70,027 posts

231 months

Monday 16th July 2018
quotequote all
Integroo said:
Worst part about the English housing market, and the best part about the Scottish housing market. In Scotland, if an offer is made and accepted, there is a binding contract at that point.

Edited by Integroo on Monday 16th July 18:52
Quite so. I would destroy the Law of Property Act if I was in power and install a system which matches the Scottish one.