What are your unpopular opinions?
Discussion
aaron_2000 said:
poing said:
Turbotechnic said:
A mk3 Escort XR3i is better than a mk1 Golf gti.
In hatchback form I'd agree but in drop top not so much.I had one, and it would beat an XR3i from the lights.
Alex said:
aaron_2000 said:
poing said:
Turbotechnic said:
A mk3 Escort XR3i is better than a mk1 Golf gti.
In hatchback form I'd agree but in drop top not so much.I had one, and it would beat an XR3i from the lights.
Butter Face said:
singlecoil said:
I think not having children is a good thing when writing a will, because then you can leave it to somebody who actually deserves it.
if you think your own children don't deserve to be left anything, then you've f
ked up bringing them up, your fault not theirs. IMO 
My parents did a good job raising my brother and I but he is still a
.IJB1959 said:
I think Bruce Springsteen is awful, and untunefully screams out his songs.
So true. He's a good songwriter, but his stuff is always better done by other people.Blinded By The Light is better by Manfred Mann. Born To Run is better by FGTH.
Just wish he'd stick to writing and give up performing.
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is. This isn't to dismiss the experiences and lives of people who are gay, they have all the same rights as anyone else, and should never feel inferior or like they are somehow broken or wrong... but it doesn't get away from the fact that if everyone was gay, humankind would end within that generation. I am equally not saying a reduction in numbers in the human race overall a bad thing.
Further to the above, could it be that environmental factors such as drugs, foods, pollution be increasing rates of homosexuality? It is impossible to research these days because it is too controversial, and with academia being a little bit liberal, it just won't get funded.
Now multi-gender, transgender.... i have to admit that i struggle to get on board there. I don't feel i align to the traditional definition of a man e.g. i hate football, i am no good at sport, i can't fix mechanical things or do DIY that well.... etc... but that doesn't mean i have decided that I have to therefore have my own gender that neatly describes me in every way and has a population of 1. Defining people by what they are rather than what they do and can do, well there are numerous stories in history of why that's a bad thing, and people should no more do it to themselves than to others. People waste time on this st rather than just getting on with their lives.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is. This isn't to dismiss the experiences and lives of people who are gay, they have all the same rights as anyone else, and should never feel inferior or like they are somehow broken or wrong... but it doesn't get away from the fact that if everyone was gay, humankind would end within that generation. I am equally not saying a reduction in numbers in the human race overall a bad thing.
Further to the above, could it be that environmental factors such as drugs, foods, pollution be increasing rates of homosexuality? It is impossible to research these days because it is too controversial, and with academia being a little bit liberal, it just won't get funded.
Now multi-gender, transgender.... i have to admit that i struggle to get on board there. I don't feel i align to the traditional definition of a man e.g. i hate football, i am no good at sport, i can't fix mechanical things or do DIY that well.... etc... but that doesn't mean i have decided that I have to therefore have my own gender that neatly describes me in every way and has a population of 1. Defining people by what they are rather than what they do and can do, well there are numerous stories in history of why that's a bad thing, and people should no more do it to themselves than to others. People waste time on this s
t rather than just getting on with their lives. Blown2CV said:
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
I thinks its fair to say that may well be an unpopular opinion.............However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
bristolracer said:
Blown2CV said:
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
I thinks its fair to say that may well be an unpopular opinion.............However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
bristolracer said:
Blown2CV said:
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
I thinks its fair to say that may well be an unpopular opinion.............However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
bristolracer said:
Blown2CV said:
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
I thinks its fair to say that may well be an unpopular opinion.............However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
IJB1959 said:
bristolracer said:
Blown2CV said:
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
I thinks its fair to say that may well be an unpopular opinion.............However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
ks sake if you just read my post you'll see it is clearly not about how I feel about homosexuality and people that are. Blown2CV said:
bristolracer said:
Blown2CV said:
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
I thinks its fair to say that may well be an unpopular opinion.............However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
Evolution or more accurately, natural selection, which you are referencing works on the macro level, it's to do with the behaviour of the species, not the behaviour of the individual. Using individual behaviours to predict the fate of a species demonstrates you don't understand the science.
Are you honestly trying to say that gay people are causing the entire species to stop procreating? Because given that the human population is growing, that seems horribly flawed.
You are of course, entitled to your own opinion on homosexuals... but you're not entitled to your own facts.
IJB1959 said:
bristolracer said:
Blown2CV said:
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
I thinks its fair to say that may well be an unpopular opinion.............However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
captain_cynic said:
Blown2CV said:
bristolracer said:
Blown2CV said:
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
I thinks its fair to say that may well be an unpopular opinion.............However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
Evolution or more accurately, natural selection, which you are referencing works on the macro level, it's to do with the behaviour of the species, not the behaviour of the individual. Using individual behaviours to predict the fate of a species demonstrates you don't understand the science.
Are you honestly trying to say that gay people are causing the entire species to stop procreating? Because given that the human population is growing, that seems horribly flawed.
You are of course, entitled to your own opinion on homosexuals... but you're not entitled to your own facts.
you will see that i have never said anything negative about homosexuality. The only thing I have said is that just about everything else that would cause a sharp stop to a genetic line would be treated as a negative thing, and yet no research is being done into finding out why homosexuality occurs, and it is mainly because science is a bit scared of how people can react. I just find it interesting.
Blown2CV said:
IJB1959 said:
bristolracer said:
Blown2CV said:
i have nothing against people who are gay, it's totally fine with me. If my kids ended up being, then that's fine too.
However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
I thinks its fair to say that may well be an unpopular opinion.............However, from an evolutionary standpoint, because it stops the breeding line, it is technically a disease (as extremely unfashionable as it is to say openly... unfortunately i can't think of another word but i am very much not using it as an attacking term), in the same way that anything that stops procreation or causes it to fail is.
ks sake if you just read my post you'll see it is clearly not about how I feel about homosexuality and people that are. Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff