PH Euro Lottery syndicate one-off: let's do this!
Discussion
51mes said:
Happy to reload, but only if spud is up for it..
That's some serious jackpot, can't leave it lying on the table - does it ever get to the point whereby it must be won on a draw....?
S.
"While there is no strict rollover limit for the EuroMillions jackpot, the top prize is capped once it reaches €190 million and stays at this level for a maximum of four draws. If, after the fourth draw with a €190 million jackpot, there is still no top prize winner, then the funds roll down to the next winning prize tier."That's some serious jackpot, can't leave it lying on the table - does it ever get to the point whereby it must be won on a draw....?
S.
wazztie16 said:
Bungleaio said:
Apologies I've only ever sent £2.50 i didn't realise people were paying more. I'll put extra in to buy a beer.
Not everyone sends extra and there's no obligation to, but putting the extra 20/30p every couple of runs or whatever is a nice little gesture. It must take a huge amount of work and if everyone tops up with a token amount it buys Mrs Spud a nice takeaway
Good luck everyone
Would it be worthwhile considering a different approach for these multi-rollover high value jackpots?
As in, once the £100mil threshold is passed, we bite the bullet and buy two, maybe three tickets each on the first drop and increase the chance of winning from miniscule to tiny?
Given an average of 175 PH participants, that would be 350 tickets played in one game (at x2 purchases each), instead of the 175 over two rollovers:
- we increase the chance of winning
- we pay the same,
- Tater isn't viewed as an addict and gets (some of) his life back
What's the flaw in this genius scheme?
As in, once the £100mil threshold is passed, we bite the bullet and buy two, maybe three tickets each on the first drop and increase the chance of winning from miniscule to tiny?
Given an average of 175 PH participants, that would be 350 tickets played in one game (at x2 purchases each), instead of the 175 over two rollovers:
- we increase the chance of winning
- we pay the same,
- Tater isn't viewed as an addict and gets (some of) his life back
What's the flaw in this genius scheme?
Edited by ReaderScars on Thursday 28th September 13:25
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff