What is this on Google maps?

What is this on Google maps?

Author
Discussion

egoold

Original Poster:

544 posts

270 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Friend and I were talking at weekend and asked if I knew
What this was near where I live on Google maps

https://maps.app.goo.gl/GhfuYL73vbc63hxw9?g_st=ic



There looks to be 4 similar possibly concrete structures, no idea what they are. Anyone want to guess

E3134

3,669 posts

101 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Looks like a sand and gravel quarry with a loading area perhaps?

Doofus

26,309 posts

175 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
egoold said:
Friend and I were talking at weekend and asked if I knew
What this was near where I live on Google maps

https://maps.app.goo.gl/GhfuYL73vbc63hxw9?g_st=ic



There looks to be 4 similar possibly concrete structures, no idea what they are. Anyone want to guess
Houses.

See Rightmove.

essayer

9,121 posts

196 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Former antiaircraft battery site

https://canmore.org.uk/site/105315/stockiemuir

egoold

Original Poster:

544 posts

270 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
essayer said:
Former antiaircraft battery site

https://canmore.org.uk/site/105315/stockiemuir
Thank you mystery solved . Looks like they have been doing some work around them too

Doofus

26,309 posts

175 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
egoold said:
Thank you mystery solved . Looks like they have been doing some work around them too
They have. As above, see Rightmove.

s2kjock

1,701 posts

149 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
I assumed this was somewhere in the South of England, but surprised to see anti-aircraft batteries in that part of Scotland, and even more so that they were built in 1950.

What were they protecting, and from who, at that time?

Bonefish Blues

27,260 posts

225 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Holy Loch's not far away?

bigandclever

13,840 posts

240 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
s2kjock said:
What were they protecting, and from who, at that time?
Outbreak of the Korean War and the associated twitchiness of how the Russians would behave?

lufbramatt

5,365 posts

136 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
s2kjock said:
I assumed this was somewhere in the South of England, but surprised to see anti-aircraft batteries in that part of Scotland, and even more so that they were built in 1950.

What were they protecting, and from who, at that time?
The nuclear submarine base at Faslane isn’t far to the west from there

Bonefish Blues

27,260 posts

225 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
s2kjock said:
I assumed this was somewhere in the South of England, but surprised to see anti-aircraft batteries in that part of Scotland, and even more so that they were built in 1950.

What were they protecting, and from who, at that time?
The nuclear submarine base at Faslane isn’t far to the west from there
Wasn't in use for those when these were built. Holy Loch was the original one I believe.

hidetheelephants

25,232 posts

195 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Doofus said:
egoold said:
Thank you mystery solved . Looks like they have been doing some work around them too
They have. As above, see Rightmove.
Quite optimistic given they got knocked back for planning, all that earthmoving for nowt.
s2kjock said:
I assumed this was somewhere in the South of England, but surprised to see anti-aircraft batteries in that part of Scotland, and even more so that they were built in 1950.

What were they protecting, and from who, at that time?
Protecting us from the red menace. There were others through the central belt; it was a major centre of population and manufacturing just like the Midlands etc. and deemed worth protecting, although jet aircraft and eventually ICBMs rendered even radar guided AA guns obsolete. The defence budget was slashed after the war, only to be massively increased when the Korean war started so delayed projects like this got built even though sober reflection might have caused them to be cancelled as hopelessly out of date. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. At that time the subs were based at Rothesay, the move to Faslane wasn't until the end of the 50s and the USN didn't arrive in Holy Loch until the 60s.

Edited by hidetheelephants on Monday 6th May 22:06

Jim1064

360 posts

207 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/143332604#/...

I like that. But at £1.2M they're taking the piss

cptsideways

13,575 posts

254 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Jim1064 said:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/143332604#/...

I like that. But at £1.2M they're taking the piss
For all of them 1.2m about right

GliderRider

2,178 posts

83 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
If the guns in those four sites were firing at maximum rate, the damage on the ground from falling shrapnel would have been pretty destructive, regardless of what the Ruskies managed to do.

hidetheelephants

25,232 posts

195 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
GliderRider said:
If the guns in those four sites were firing at maximum rate, the damage on the ground from falling shrapnel would have been pretty destructive, regardless of what the Ruskies managed to do.
Gives the kids something to collect for the scrap drive. hehe

sherman

13,463 posts

217 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Clydebank is not too far south. Protecting the shipbuilding from air raids ?

Nethybridge

1,103 posts

14 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all

I wonder why western Scotland was chosen for a nuclear naval base
when other naval bases are in SE England.

Maybe nuclear is the clue.

[ Official SNP anti-English grudge No. 24564334]

hidetheelephants

25,232 posts

195 months

Monday 6th May
quotequote all
Nethybridge said:

I wonder why western Scotland was chosen for a nuclear naval base
when other naval bases are in SE England.

Maybe nuclear is the clue.

[ Official SNP anti-English grudge No. 24564334]
A practical submarine base had to have a suitable site for a ICBM storage/maintenance/loading facility near enough to be practical but far enough away to not be vulnerable to a single nuclear attack; IIRC other sites considered were Lough Foyle, Falmouth and Milford Haven, they were discounted because of excess irishness, too many people living nearby and being too near to oil refineries etc. Easy access to the North Atlantic is also an advantage for Faslane, it's a short distance from the Clyde to the edge of the continental shelf.

PurplePenguin

2,877 posts

35 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Nethybridge said:

I wonder why western Scotland was chosen for a nuclear naval base
when other naval bases are in SE England.

Maybe nuclear is the clue.

[ Official SNP anti-English grudge No. 24564334]
A practical submarine base had to have a suitable site for a ICBM storage/maintenance/loading facility near enough to be practical but far enough away to not be vulnerable to a single nuclear attack; IIRC other sites considered were Lough Foyle, Falmouth and Milford Haven, they were discounted because of excess irishness, too many people living nearby and being too near to oil refineries etc. Easy access to the North Atlantic is also an advantage for Faslane, it's a short distance from the Clyde to the edge of the continental shelf.
The armaments for submarines were stored at Coulport