Why humans crave fatty foods

Why humans crave fatty foods

Author
Discussion

Manks

26,486 posts

223 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
el stovey said:
Listen to you anti carb followers, it's like religious dogma you're spouting. Blaming carbs for being fat AND making you hungry. hehe
They are correct though, in my opinion.

When I eat carbs I need to refuel at fairly precise times otherwise I feel irritably hungry. It's blood sugar fluctuations I think. I tend not to get gnawing hunger when eating low carb.

Also noticeable is better performance in endurance type activity. I am not sure what the exact science is but what seems to happen is that fat consumed as food provides energy in the absence of carbs, and when that fat has run out the transition to using body fat it seamless. Whereas when energy derived from carbs is exhausted I cannot continue to perform well without ingesting more carbs.

As I say, I am not especially interested in the science. I just know what works for me.





Ordinary_Chap

7,520 posts

244 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
I think everyone is right in their own way.

I am most certainly in the low/zero carb camp. I generally eat lower amounts of carbs and natural carbs and sometimes I go zero carb or as its known Ketosis.

Carbs ARE not required for the body to function correctly however they have their advantages when used correctly.

I think the answer is somewhere between most camps and identifying what you need and what makes you gain weight.

Lee

Flibble

6,476 posts

182 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
Ordinary_Chap said:
I think everyone is right in their own way.

I am most certainly in the low/zero carb camp. I generally eat lower amounts of carbs and natural carbs and sometimes I go zero carb or as its known Ketosis.

Carbs ARE not required for the body to function correctly however they have their advantages when used correctly.

I think the answer is somewhere between most camps and identifying what you need and what makes you gain weight.
Well ultimately carbs are required for everything, since cells can only run on simple carbs (usually glucose). You don't neccessarily need to eat dietary carbs though if that's what you're saying.

I think more distinction needs to be made between refined simple carbs and unrefined complex carbs, since the latter don't cause the huge insulin spikes and are arguably better for you than loads of fat.

Ordinary_Chap

7,520 posts

244 months

Thursday 28th June 2012
quotequote all
Flibble said:
Ordinary_Chap said:
I think everyone is right in their own way.

I am most certainly in the low/zero carb camp. I generally eat lower amounts of carbs and natural carbs and sometimes I go zero carb or as its known Ketosis.

Carbs ARE not required for the body to function correctly however they have their advantages when used correctly.

I think the answer is somewhere between most camps and identifying what you need and what makes you gain weight.
Well ultimately carbs are required for everything, since cells can only run on simple carbs (usually glucose). You don't neccessarily need to eat dietary carbs though if that's what you're saying.

I think more distinction needs to be made between refined simple carbs and unrefined complex carbs, since the latter don't cause the huge insulin spikes and are arguably better for you than loads of fat.
Maybe I should of made it clear, you don't need to eat carbs, they aren't required.

Manks

26,486 posts

223 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
Flibble said:
Well ultimately carbs are required for everything, since cells can only run on simple carbs (usually glucose). You don't neccessarily need to eat dietary carbs though if that's what you're saying.

I think more distinction needs to be made between refined simple carbs and unrefined complex carbs, since the latter don't cause the huge insulin spikes and are arguably better for you than loads of fat.
Interesting thing: When I go to Italy I can eat a "normal" diet for a week or so and not put on weight, whereas if I did it here I would gain a few pounds. I am guessing it's because they have less processed food.

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

225 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
mattikake said:
It completely explains why some qualified with these as their training source would recommend using a Deadlift to work your Abs or would need a 1st year Gym Instructor (me) to point out that twisting an ankle inwards is an "Inversion" of the ankle... etc. I kid you not! mad
Sorry had to pull you up there, slightly off topic but deadlifts are probably the best exercise for abs around.

RegMolehusband

3,968 posts

258 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
I've lowered my carb intake in recent months and have lost 4kg out of 83. Also as a result of eating barely no wheat-based products I've reduced heartburn and stabilised my digestion processes a great deal.

LordGrover

33,555 posts

213 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
yes Cutting wheat, corn and pretty much every other commercially grown grain, especially the refined products like corn syrup, will prove beneficial for most.

JudgeMental

Original Poster:

7,251 posts

234 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
markcoznottz said:
mattikake said:
It completely explains why some qualified with these as their training source would recommend using a Deadlift to work your Abs or would need a 1st year Gym Instructor (me) to point out that twisting an ankle inwards is an "Inversion" of the ankle... etc. I kid you not! mad
Sorry had to pull you up there, slightly off topic but deadlifts are probably the best exercise for abs around.
As a supporting muscle group, I can see the abs would take some benefit from this excercise.

Looking at the bigger picture; I've (more recently) seen deadlifts referred to as a Back exercise. I do deads for glutes and hams confused

LordGrover

33,555 posts

213 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
Deads like squats are pretty much an all-body workout in themselves. hehe

Hoofy

76,555 posts

283 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
Manks said:
Also noticeable is better performance in endurance type activity. I am not sure what the exact science is but what seems to happen is that fat consumed as food provides energy in the absence of carbs, and when that fat has run out the transition to using body fat it seamless. Whereas when energy derived from carbs is exhausted I cannot continue to perform well without ingesting more carbs.
Interesting. What kinds of endurance activities?

The only problem I see with carbs is they contain a lot of energy which is why I've reduced my carb intake to around 150-200g a day. Hunger is just a feeling and you can get used to such feelings. As to good carbs vs bad carbs, it really depends on your goal.

In any case, what ever you're eating, if you're going to fill your tank to the brim and keep filling it every 4 hours, you better intend on driving somewhere.

Edited by Hoofy on Friday 29th June 09:30

Manks

26,486 posts

223 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
Manks said:
Also noticeable is better performance in endurance type activity. I am not sure what the exact science is but what seems to happen is that fat consumed as food provides energy in the absence of carbs, and when that fat has run out the transition to using body fat it seamless. Whereas when energy derived from carbs is exhausted I cannot continue to perform well without ingesting more carbs.
Interesting. What kinds of endurance activities?

The only problem I see with carbs is they contain a lot of energy which is why I've reduced my carb intake to around 150-200g a day.

If you're going to fill your tank to the brim and keep filling it every 4 hours, you better intend on driving somewhere.
Cycling especially. I have a 20-mile route I attack as hard as my legs will allow. I can do it more easily at whatever time of the day and whether I have recently eaten or not if I am in ketosis and eating high fat. If I were on a carby diet my performance would be more hit and miss. The same is true of running.

It is an odd sensation and feels like I have exhausted my immediate fuel supplies, but am still able to draw on other resources without loss of performance.

mattikake

5,061 posts

200 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
JudgeMental said:
markcoznottz said:
mattikake said:
It completely explains why some qualified with these as their training source would recommend using a Deadlift to work your Abs or would need a 1st year Gym Instructor (me) to point out that twisting an ankle inwards is an "Inversion" of the ankle... etc. I kid you not! mad
Sorry had to pull you up there, slightly off topic but deadlifts are probably the best exercise for abs around.
As a supporting muscle group, I can see the abs would take some benefit from this excercise.

Looking at the bigger picture; I've (more recently) seen deadlifts referred to as a Back exercise. I do deads for glutes and hams confused
Your Abs (Rectus Abdominis we're talking about here) would only work slightly as a synergist on the way up perhaps for stability (and even then it will be dominated by many other synergists), and a fixator at the very top of the lift, but that is all. It's not the type of exercise you would recommend when someone asking for a good one to work the Abs (FFS)!

There's an easy way to tell this for yourself. Stand up, feet shoulder width apart, dig your fingers right into your Abs, perform an imaginary deadlift with your fingers dug in. At what point do your Abs flex? They don't apart from the very top of the motion where you Abs flex momentarily to stop you hyper-extening your back, but with a heavy weight suspended from your arms, instead of nothing, you're hardly going to need to do this as gravity will stop any hyper-extension when you stop lifting... unless you do go a bit further and deliberately arch your back or aim to hold the lift for a few seconds. So if there is work for you Abs to do, it is minimal and momentary at the top of a held lift.

Deadlifts are great for working virtually all the muscles in your posterior frontal plane - from your calves to your neck - and shoulders, grip, etc. so are probably only bettered by squats for a mega compound exercise. The number of muscles activated is why you get so out of breath doing them, compared to other exercises.

Edited by mattikake on Friday 29th June 11:02

didelydoo

5,533 posts

211 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
mattikake said:
Your Abs (Rectus Abdominis we're talking about here) would only work slightly as a synergist on the way up perhaps for stability (and even then it will be dominated by many other synergists), and a fixator at the very top of the lift, but that is all. It's not the type of exercise you would recommend when someone asking for a good one to work the Abs (FFS)!

There's an easy way to tell this for yourself. Stand up, feet shoulder width apart, dig your fingers right into your Abs, perform an imaginary deadlift with your fingers dug in. At what point do your Abs flex? They don't apart from the very top of the motion where you Abs flex momentarily to stop you hyper-extening your back, but with a heavy weight suspended from your arms, instead of nothing, you're hardly going to need to do this as gravity will stop any hyper-extension when you stop lifting... unless you do go a bit further and deliberately arch your back or aim to hold the lift for a few seconds. So if there is work for you Abs to do, it is minimal and momentary at the top of a held lift.

Deadlifts are great for working virtually all the muscles in your posterior frontal plane - from your calves to your neck - and shoulders, grip, etc. so are probably only bettered by squats for a mega compound exercise. The number of muscles activated is why you get so out of breath doing them, compared to other exercises.

Edited by mattikake on Friday 29th June 11:02
Sorry, but abdominal muscles do play a big part in deadlifting.

Edit to add- if your abs dont go solid when you deadlift, you're not doing it right.

Edited by didelydoo on Friday 29th June 11:14

mattikake

5,061 posts

200 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
didelydoo said:
mattikake said:
Your Abs (Rectus Abdominis we're talking about here) would only work slightly as a synergist on the way up perhaps for stability (and even then it will be dominated by many other synergists), and a fixator at the very top of the lift, but that is all. It's not the type of exercise you would recommend when someone asking for a good one to work the Abs (FFS)!

There's an easy way to tell this for yourself. Stand up, feet shoulder width apart, dig your fingers right into your Abs, perform an imaginary deadlift with your fingers dug in. At what point do your Abs flex? They don't apart from the very top of the motion where you Abs flex momentarily to stop you hyper-extening your back, but with a heavy weight suspended from your arms, instead of nothing, you're hardly going to need to do this as gravity will stop any hyper-extension when you stop lifting... unless you do go a bit further and deliberately arch your back or aim to hold the lift for a few seconds. So if there is work for you Abs to do, it is minimal and momentary at the top of a held lift.

Deadlifts are great for working virtually all the muscles in your posterior frontal plane - from your calves to your neck - and shoulders, grip, etc. so are probably only bettered by squats for a mega compound exercise. The number of muscles activated is why you get so out of breath doing them, compared to other exercises.

Edited by mattikake on Friday 29th June 11:02
Sorry, but abdominal muscles do play a big part in deadlifting.

Edit to add- if your abs dont go solid when you deadlift, you're not doing it right.

Edited by didelydoo on Friday 29th June 11:14
Fixator at the top of the lift.

My original point was and stands, if someone asked you for an Ab exercise, given all the others available would you suggest a deadlift?

Edited by mattikake on Friday 29th June 14:09

markcoznottz

7,155 posts

225 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
mattikake said:
Fixator at the top of the lift.

My original point was and stands, if someone asked you for an Ab exercise, given all the others available would you suggest a deadlift?
1000% yes. And squats as well. Best two exercises in existence. You strike me as a bit of an armchair expert.

LordGrover

33,555 posts

213 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all

superkartracer

8,959 posts

223 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
markcoznottz said:
mattikake said:
Fixator at the top of the lift.

My original point was and stands, if someone asked you for an Ab exercise, given all the others available would you suggest a deadlift?
1000% yes. And squats as well. Best two exercises in existence. You strike me as a bit of an armchair expert.
Both poor and open to dangers , try long planks, they won't damage your back either.

mattikake

5,061 posts

200 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
markcoznottz said:
mattikake said:
Fixator at the top of the lift.

My original point was and stands, if someone asked you for an Ab exercise, given all the others available would you suggest a deadlift?
1000% yes. And squats as well. Best two exercises in existence. You strike me as a bit of an armchair expert.
No. I'm a qualified expert. What would that make you Mr. Property Developer?

"Please Mr. PT, could you recommend me a good Ab exercise?"
"Hmm, well lets see. There's all kinds of Crunches, Leg raises, Pikes, Body weight and Planks, Stability Ball variants, flat/declined/weighted versions on bench or floor, Kettlebells... but actually sod all that, what you want is a nice deadlift."

Riiiight. rolleyes

R300will

3,799 posts

152 months

Friday 29th June 2012
quotequote all
Liquid Tuna said:
R300will said:
Hoofy said:
Leptons said:
I once knew a guy who was fairly slim but still had a slight moob problem.


whistle
Was your "friend" actually fairly slim or did he actually have a paunch.
Or was he a pre op on HRT?
Or he may have had gynecomastia.
Someone's been watching embarrasing bodies wink