30 somethings - are you going to vax?
Discussion
davey83 said:
jjlynn27 said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
If the exact same data was discussed by someone else using the same references and graphs, does it change the references and graphs? A lot of the data was from the CDC, because Kresser found the data is the CDC data no longer relevant? Kresser is one of the leading functional medicine practitioners in the world and director of his own department in the Cleveland Clinic. But sure, whatever.
Typical MO of a conspiracy nutter. Gets 'data' that he/she doesn't understand from some other nutter on the internet. That's why you've posted that debunked link from a psychiatrist. He is an acupuncturist. Ok? 'Functional medicine'? Bwahahahahaha. I gave you a direct quote from his website. Bloke suggests that pregnant women should drink 'raw milk'. Do you understand how stupid that is? Saying that if your source of information is someone who, in his own words, is practitioner of 'ancestral health', your post justifying chemtrail's nutter 'cell therapy' idiocy is rather understandable.
I'm looking forward to your next 'data'. It'll probably come from a homeopath. Or reflexologist.
LOL @ acupuncturist. Still funny.
Cardiologist, epidemiologist, a full professor of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine in Dallas. He also has a master's degree in public health and is known for being one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States and is the editor of two medical journals.
Dr. McCullough is recognized internationally as a leading figure, having over 1,000 publications to his name and over 500 citations in the National Library of Medicine
A fella worth listening too maybe? No, shame that. All you are doing is exactly the same as anyone who isn't vaxxed, listening to medical professionals that "you" already believe to be corrected. You're answer to the above question will confirm as much.
Edited by davey83 on Thursday 10th February 14:43
Why, just why, do you keep posting cut-and-paste CV’s of people you think are credible without checking??
You must have done this over 20 times now so you’re either truly oblivious to reality or have a very flat learning curve.
Please read this in full and you may actually learn something:
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/joe-rogan-i...
So far you are the most easily conned on here.
Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 10th February 15:37
V6 Pushfit said:
So far you are the most easily conned on here.
So stella career in epidemiology and cardiology, incredibly well published and since 2020 has gone mad - does that balance for you in your world. Are you familiar with the term slander..... Edited by V6 Pushfit on Thursday 10th February 15:37
What is it exactly I've been conned into? and what increase in risk am I now subject too from such a position and please present your evidence to back up said statement.
davey83 said:
V6 Pushfit said:
So far you are the most easily conned on here.
So stella career in epidemiology and cardiology, incredibly well published and since 2020 has gone mad - does that balance for you in your world. Are you familiar with the term slander..... Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 10th February 15:37
What is it exactly I've been conned into? and what increase in risk am I now subject too from such a position and please present your evidence to back up said statement.
Better?
davey83 said:
I could take your playground posts if you didn't demonstrate your lack of understanding with regards to flu, believing the exact same vaccine is given season after season.
To learn involves making mistakes, what learning have you done with regards to COVID-19 since March 2020?
I haven’t said that they were the same. To learn involves making mistakes, what learning have you done with regards to COVID-19 since March 2020?
Fantasy questions. You still haven’t explained why you keep posting links to debunked loons. You actually find this trash, read it, copy paste a load of rubbish to support it - but 20 seconds of checking would tell you it’s been proved loon material.
Absolutely astonishing.
Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 10th February 20:16
V6 Pushfit said:
davey83 said:
I could take your playground posts if you didn't demonstrate your lack of understanding with regards to flu, believing the exact same vaccine is given season after season.
To learn involves making mistakes, what learning have you done with regards to COVID-19 since March 2020?
I haven’t said that they were the same. To learn involves making mistakes, what learning have you done with regards to COVID-19 since March 2020?
Fantasy questions. You still haven’t explained why you keep posting links to debunked loons. You actually find this trash, read it, copy paste a load of rubbish to support it - but 20 seconds of checking would tell you it’s been proved loon material.
Absolutely astonishing.
Edited by V6 Pushfit on Thursday 10th February 20:16
ruggedscotty said:
V6 Pushfit said:
davey83 said:
I could take your playground posts if you didn't demonstrate your lack of understanding with regards to flu, believing the exact same vaccine is given season after season.
To learn involves making mistakes, what learning have you done with regards to COVID-19 since March 2020?
I haven’t said that they were the same. To learn involves making mistakes, what learning have you done with regards to COVID-19 since March 2020?
Fantasy questions. You still haven’t explained why you keep posting links to debunked loons. You actually find this trash, read it, copy paste a load of rubbish to support it - but 20 seconds of checking would tell you it’s been proved loon material.
Absolutely astonishing.
Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 10th February 20:16
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
jjlynn27 said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
If the exact same data was discussed by someone else using the same references and graphs, does it change the references and graphs? A lot of the data was from the CDC, because Kresser found the data is the CDC data no longer relevant? Kresser is one of the leading functional medicine practitioners in the world and director of his own department in the Cleveland Clinic. But sure, whatever.
Typical MO of a conspiracy nutter. Gets 'data' that he/she doesn't understand from some other nutter on the internet. That's why you've posted that debunked link from a psychiatrist. He is an acupuncturist. Ok? 'Functional medicine'? Bwahahahahaha. I gave you a direct quote from his website. Bloke suggests that pregnant women should drink 'raw milk'. Do you understand how stupid that is? Saying that if your source of information is someone who, in his own words, is practitioner of 'ancestral health', your post justifying chemtrail's nutter 'cell therapy' idiocy is rather understandable.
I'm looking forward to your next 'data'. It'll probably come from a homeopath. Or reflexologist.
LOL @ acupuncturist. Still funny.
After this fiasco, which is even more laughable than your attempt with debunked psychiatrist's opinion, I'm not surprised that you think that governments around the world were 'conned'.
I also wouldn't be surprised if you believe that cleaning one's chakra in the seventh house while pricked with a few needles can cure cancer.
Tragic and entertaining in equal measure.
davey83 said:
jjlynn27 said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
If the exact same data was discussed by someone else using the same references and graphs, does it change the references and graphs? A lot of the data was from the CDC, because Kresser found the data is the CDC data no longer relevant? Kresser is one of the leading functional medicine practitioners in the world and director of his own department in the Cleveland Clinic. But sure, whatever.
Typical MO of a conspiracy nutter. Gets 'data' that he/she doesn't understand from some other nutter on the internet. That's why you've posted that debunked link from a psychiatrist. He is an acupuncturist. Ok? 'Functional medicine'? Bwahahahahaha. I gave you a direct quote from his website. Bloke suggests that pregnant women should drink 'raw milk'. Do you understand how stupid that is? Saying that if your source of information is someone who, in his own words, is practitioner of 'ancestral health', your post justifying chemtrail's nutter 'cell therapy' idiocy is rather understandable.
I'm looking forward to your next 'data'. It'll probably come from a homeopath. Or reflexologist.
LOL @ acupuncturist. Still funny.
Cardiologist, epidemiologist, a full professor of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine in Dallas. He also has a master's degree in public health and is known for being one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States and is the editor of two medical journals.
Dr. McCullough is recognized internationally as a leading figure, having over 1,000 publications to his name and over 500 citations in the National Library of Medicine
A fella worth listening too maybe? No, shame that. All you are doing is exactly the same as anyone who isn't vaxxed, listening to medical professionals that "you" already believe to be corrected. You're answer to the above question will confirm as much.
Edited by davey83 on Thursday 10th February 14:43
That's wishful thinking, mostly borne out of the scarcity of sources that you are left with. In the same way that MMR nutters think that Wakefield is a leading epidemiologist. You say, or more likely uncritically copy someone's CV as a matter of fact. Given the above, that's not surprising.
His previous employer sues him, and wins, for misrepresenting his links with the said employer. Am I supposed to take seriously an opinion of someone who has been found as a liar?
I'm not aware that he's a professor of Medicine @ TAMU. Do you have any evidence of this? Link to faculty staff page or his own page at @tamu will do.
Side note; 'you're' != 'your'.
jjlynn27 said:
davey83 said:
jjlynn27 said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
If the exact same data was discussed by someone else using the same references and graphs, does it change the references and graphs? A lot of the data was from the CDC, because Kresser found the data is the CDC data no longer relevant? Kresser is one of the leading functional medicine practitioners in the world and director of his own department in the Cleveland Clinic. But sure, whatever.
Typical MO of a conspiracy nutter. Gets 'data' that he/she doesn't understand from some other nutter on the internet. That's why you've posted that debunked link from a psychiatrist. He is an acupuncturist. Ok? 'Functional medicine'? Bwahahahahaha. I gave you a direct quote from his website. Bloke suggests that pregnant women should drink 'raw milk'. Do you understand how stupid that is? Saying that if your source of information is someone who, in his own words, is practitioner of 'ancestral health', your post justifying chemtrail's nutter 'cell therapy' idiocy is rather understandable.
I'm looking forward to your next 'data'. It'll probably come from a homeopath. Or reflexologist.
LOL @ acupuncturist. Still funny.
Cardiologist, epidemiologist, a full professor of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine in Dallas. He also has a master's degree in public health and is known for being one of the top five most-published medical researchers in the United States and is the editor of two medical journals.
Dr. McCullough is recognized internationally as a leading figure, having over 1,000 publications to his name and over 500 citations in the National Library of Medicine
A fella worth listening too maybe? No, shame that. All you are doing is exactly the same as anyone who isn't vaxxed, listening to medical professionals that "you" already believe to be corrected. You're answer to the above question will confirm as much.
Edited by davey83 on Thursday 10th February 14:43
That's wishful thinking, mostly borne out of the scarcity of sources that you are left with. In the same way that MMR nutters think that Wakefield is a leading epidemiologist. You say, or more likely uncritically copy someone's CV as a matter of fact. Given the above, that's not surprising.
His previous employer sues him, and wins, for misrepresenting his links with the said employer. Am I supposed to take seriously an opinion of someone who has been found as a liar?
I'm not aware that he's a professor of Medicine @ TAMU. Do you have any evidence of this? Link to faculty staff page or his own page at @tamu will do.
Side note; 'you're' != 'your'.
Nice sidestep of the question, it surprises me ever time.
You still haven't given an example for a vaccine being needed after gaining natural immunity for an infectious disease, bearing in mind you don't gain immunity to the flu due to its nature.
That's question 1 and no.2 is what have you learnt about covid19 since march 2020? Genuine question.
You still haven't given an example for a vaccine being needed after gaining natural immunity for an infectious disease, bearing in mind you don't gain immunity to the flu due to its nature.
That's question 1 and no.2 is what have you learnt about covid19 since march 2020? Genuine question.
jjlynn27 said:
You see, 'Boi', antivaxxers have this tendency to believe that any other antivaxxer loon is a 'leading'. Lex thinks that his acupuncturist is 'leading' too.
That's wishful thinking, mostly borne out of the scarcity of sources that you are left with. In the same way that MMR nutters think that Wakefield is a leading epidemiologist. You say, or more likely uncritically copy someone's CV as a matter of fact. Given the above, that's not surprising.
His previous employer sues him, and wins, for misrepresenting his links with the said employer. Am I supposed to take seriously an opinion of someone who has been found as a liar?
I'm not aware that he's a professor of Medicine @ TAMU. Do you have any evidence of this? Link to faculty staff page or his own page at @tamu will do.
Side note; 'you're' != 'your'.
What of Mike Yeadon former VP/Chief Scientific Pfizer Inc, anti vaxxer? Never had a jab before 2020. That's wishful thinking, mostly borne out of the scarcity of sources that you are left with. In the same way that MMR nutters think that Wakefield is a leading epidemiologist. You say, or more likely uncritically copy someone's CV as a matter of fact. Given the above, that's not surprising.
His previous employer sues him, and wins, for misrepresenting his links with the said employer. Am I supposed to take seriously an opinion of someone who has been found as a liar?
I'm not aware that he's a professor of Medicine @ TAMU. Do you have any evidence of this? Link to faculty staff page or his own page at @tamu will do.
Side note; 'you're' != 'your'.
What of Jay Bhattacharya a professor of medicine at Stanford University and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. He directs Stanford's Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging.
Anti vaxxers too, got yah.
I thankfully don't need chemotherapy, I don't want chemotherapy therefore am I anti chemotherapy? I must be right.
The formation psychosis is real.
Edited by davey83 on Friday 11th February 18:26
davey83 said:
Nice sidestep of the question, it surprises me ever time.
You still haven't given an example for a vaccine being needed after gaining natural immunity for an infectious disease, bearing in mind you don't gain immunity to the flu due to its nature.
That's question 1 and no.2 is what have you learnt about covid19 since march 2020? Genuine question.
The answer to your question 2 answers all questions:You still haven't given an example for a vaccine being needed after gaining natural immunity for an infectious disease, bearing in mind you don't gain immunity to the flu due to its nature.
That's question 1 and no.2 is what have you learnt about covid19 since march 2020? Genuine question.
I have been amazed at the morons believing social media and debunked websites which, when it’s pointed out they’ve been conned, simply go on to the next debunked idea. They’re too preoccupied with trying to spread misinformation to check it’s validity themselves first.
Hmmm…. now who does that describe? Oh.
That must be what this is, I do try again and again to have an honest conversation but it doesn't bear good fruit. Is English your first language? I only ask as i made sure I was precise with my question as per the below to try and negate a disingenuous answer about people instead of the disease itself.
davey83 said:
with regards to COVID-19 since March 2020?
Edited by davey83 on Friday 11th February 18:34
davey83 said:
jjlynn27 said:
You see, 'Boi', antivaxxers have this tendency to believe that any other antivaxxer loon is a 'leading'. Lex thinks that his acupuncturist is 'leading' too.
That's wishful thinking, mostly borne out of the scarcity of sources that you are left with. In the same way that MMR nutters think that Wakefield is a leading epidemiologist. You say, or more likely uncritically copy someone's CV as a matter of fact. Given the above, that's not surprising.
His previous employer sues him, and wins, for misrepresenting his links with the said employer. Am I supposed to take seriously an opinion of someone who has been found as a liar?
I'm not aware that he's a professor of Medicine @ TAMU. Do you have any evidence of this? Link to faculty staff page or his own page at @tamu will do.
Side note; 'you're' != 'your'.
What of Mike Yeadon former VP/Chief Scientific Pfizer Inc, anti vaxxer? Never had a jab before 2020. That's wishful thinking, mostly borne out of the scarcity of sources that you are left with. In the same way that MMR nutters think that Wakefield is a leading epidemiologist. You say, or more likely uncritically copy someone's CV as a matter of fact. Given the above, that's not surprising.
His previous employer sues him, and wins, for misrepresenting his links with the said employer. Am I supposed to take seriously an opinion of someone who has been found as a liar?
I'm not aware that he's a professor of Medicine @ TAMU. Do you have any evidence of this? Link to faculty staff page or his own page at @tamu will do.
Side note; 'you're' != 'your'.
What of Jay Bhattacharya a professor of medicine at Stanford University and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. He directs Stanford's Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging.
Anti vaxxers too, got yah.
I thankfully don't need chemotherapy, I don't want chemotherapy therefore am I anti chemotherapy? I must be right.
The formation psychosis is real.
Edited by davey83 on Friday 11th February 18:26
jjlynn27 said:
davey83 said:
jjlynn27 said:
You see, 'Boi', antivaxxers have this tendency to believe that any other antivaxxer loon is a 'leading'. Lex thinks that his acupuncturist is 'leading' too.
That's wishful thinking, mostly borne out of the scarcity of sources that you are left with. In the same way that MMR nutters think that Wakefield is a leading epidemiologist. You say, or more likely uncritically copy someone's CV as a matter of fact. Given the above, that's not surprising.
His previous employer sues him, and wins, for misrepresenting his links with the said employer. Am I supposed to take seriously an opinion of someone who has been found as a liar?
I'm not aware that he's a professor of Medicine @ TAMU. Do you have any evidence of this? Link to faculty staff page or his own page at @tamu will do.
Side note; 'you're' != 'your'.
What of Mike Yeadon former VP/Chief Scientific Pfizer Inc, anti vaxxer? Never had a jab before 2020. That's wishful thinking, mostly borne out of the scarcity of sources that you are left with. In the same way that MMR nutters think that Wakefield is a leading epidemiologist. You say, or more likely uncritically copy someone's CV as a matter of fact. Given the above, that's not surprising.
His previous employer sues him, and wins, for misrepresenting his links with the said employer. Am I supposed to take seriously an opinion of someone who has been found as a liar?
I'm not aware that he's a professor of Medicine @ TAMU. Do you have any evidence of this? Link to faculty staff page or his own page at @tamu will do.
Side note; 'you're' != 'your'.
What of Jay Bhattacharya a professor of medicine at Stanford University and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. He directs Stanford's Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging.
Anti vaxxers too, got yah.
I thankfully don't need chemotherapy, I don't want chemotherapy therefore am I anti chemotherapy? I must be right.
The formation psychosis is real.
Edited by davey83 on Friday 11th February 18:26
davey83 said:
Classic lads, answering a question with a question again and again. It's goes question, answer. Then you ask a question, answer given. Well I am anti-chemo according to your blanket rule, formation psychosis 101
Ah yes, “formation psychosis” represents a situation where mob influence can leave an individual with rather disturbed thoughts and perceptions and unable to fully distinguish what’s real from what’s not.Err now let me think who that descr…. Oh!
Gassing Station | Health Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff