Discussion
Trophy Husband said:
How many of us blokes on here have been involved in roasting a girl the way that these footballers have/do? How many of us have done this and had our brother and a mate outside of the window videoing it?
It has been ruled that no rape occurred on the weight of the evidence. However, I would call it abuse by consent. Total exploitation in my book. Whilst it is not a crime it is certainly morally reprehensible behaviour and shows a complete lack of respect for women. Is it the first time this has happened with footballers? I bet it happened several times in several places this weekend just gone and will happen next weekend, the weekend after and every weekend after that.
This goes back to my comments about the article in the DT. If a woman consents to this activity then why are the men somehow to blame? They aren't. A woman has just as much right to engage in this type of behavior the men do and to suggest that men have to afford women some sort of special status or duty of care simply because they are women is exactly the same as saying that the poor little things don't know their own minds and need the big strong men to do their thinking for them bec It has been ruled that no rape occurred on the weight of the evidence. However, I would call it abuse by consent. Total exploitation in my book. Whilst it is not a crime it is certainly morally reprehensible behaviour and shows a complete lack of respect for women. Is it the first time this has happened with footballers? I bet it happened several times in several places this weekend just gone and will happen next weekend, the weekend after and every weekend after that.
Trophy Husband said:
How many of us blokes on here have been involved in roasting a girl the way that these footballers have/do? How many of us have done this and had our brother and a mate outside of the window videoing it?
It has been ruled that no rape occurred on the weight of the evidence. However, I would call it abuse by consent. Total exploitation in my book. Whilst it is not a crime it is certainly morally reprehensible behaviour and shows a complete lack of respect for women. Is it the first time this has happened with footballers? I bet it happened several times in several places this weekend just gone and will happen next weekend, the weekend after and every weekend after that.
This goes back to my comments about the article in the DT. If a woman consents to this activity then why are the men somehow to blame? They aren't. A woman has just as much right to engage in this type of behavior the men do and to suggest that men have to afford women some sort of special status or duty of care simply because they are women is exactly the same as saying that the poor little things don't know their own minds and need the big strong men to do their thinking for them because they can't do it for themselves. It has been ruled that no rape occurred on the weight of the evidence. However, I would call it abuse by consent. Total exploitation in my book. Whilst it is not a crime it is certainly morally reprehensible behaviour and shows a complete lack of respect for women. Is it the first time this has happened with footballers? I bet it happened several times in several places this weekend just gone and will happen next weekend, the weekend after and every weekend after that.
This for me is also part of the problem
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/1994530/li...
The same newspaper that condemns him treating women like dirt then ogles them like it's the 1970s, and reinforces the belief that you'll become famous if you can get a footballer into bed
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/1994530/li...
The same newspaper that condemns him treating women like dirt then ogles them like it's the 1970s, and reinforces the belief that you'll become famous if you can get a footballer into bed
Mr Snrub said:
This for me is also part of the problem
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/1994530/li...
The same newspaper that condemns him treating women like dirt then ogles them like it's the 1970s, and reinforces the belief that you'll become famous if you can get a footballer into bed
What do you expect from that vile rag? The Mail is as bad, simultaneously slating one celeb for gaining 5 pounds and berating another for looking too skinny. They're run by mini-Trumps so it's hardly surprising.https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/1994530/li...
The same newspaper that condemns him treating women like dirt then ogles them like it's the 1970s, and reinforces the belief that you'll become famous if you can get a footballer into bed
There's even a go fund me page to raise money to help the girl.
https://www.gofundme.com/help-ched-evans-complaina...
https://www.gofundme.com/help-ched-evans-complaina...
Mr Snrub said:
This for me is also part of the problem
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/1994530/li...
The same newspaper that condemns him treating women like dirt then ogles them like it's the 1970s, and reinforces the belief that you'll become famous if you can get a footballer into bed
fking retards. Unbelievable. I don't know how those s sleep at night. I couldn't be a journo on those papers unless I had a pseudonym - and even then I'd feel....dirty.https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/1994530/li...
The same newspaper that condemns him treating women like dirt then ogles them like it's the 1970s, and reinforces the belief that you'll become famous if you can get a footballer into bed
Don said:
Mr Snrub said:
This for me is also part of the problem
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/1994530/li...
The same newspaper that condemns him treating women like dirt then ogles them like it's the 1970s, and reinforces the belief that you'll become famous if you can get a footballer into bed
fking retards. Unbelievable. I don't know how those s sleep at night. I couldn't be a journo on those papers unless I had a pseudonym - and even then I'd feel....dirty.https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/1994530/li...
The same newspaper that condemns him treating women like dirt then ogles them like it's the 1970s, and reinforces the belief that you'll become famous if you can get a footballer into bed
PurpleTurtle said:
Good. They did the right thing when he was convicted. Although I always had my doubts that he was innocent. I said it on here and got shot down. He was then cleared by a court and is not totally innocent in the eyes of the law. Therefore it seems fitting that he is now back in the same/similar position pre conviction. Ennis-Hill owes the man an apology and is a cow in my opinion. Yes he was convicted of a horrible crime at the time. But she went out of her way to publically stick the boot in. She has not been as screamy about apologising to the poor bloke.
photosnob said:
Ennis-Hill owes the man an apology
Yes, you'd think a paragon of behaviour like her would be quick to apologise when she got it wrong. But that's not how it works in today's society. Quick to be shouty, outraged and offended - mouth shut and suspiciously quiet and no contrition whatsoever when caught out. photosnob said:
Ennis-Hill owes the man an apology and is a cow in my opinion. Yes he was convicted of a horrible crime at the time. But she went out of her way to publically stick the boot in. She has not been as screamy about apologising to the poor bloke.
She said she didn't want her name on a stand where a raper played. THat is 'sticking the boot in'? I don't see how she has anything to apologise for.Halb said:
photosnob said:
Ennis-Hill owes the man an apology and is a cow in my opinion. Yes he was convicted of a horrible crime at the time. But she went out of her way to publically stick the boot in. She has not been as screamy about apologising to the poor bloke.
She said she didn't want her name on a stand where a raper played. THat is 'sticking the boot in'? I don't see how she has anything to apologise for.She went out of her way to keep him out of the club. She stopped him even being allowed to train there. She had so much to say in the media. She should say something now and apologize.
Ched is not a rapist. He is not guilty. I don't follow Shef United but I hope he goes onto have a cracking season.
e21Mark said:
I'm not so sure he warrants an apology. My feeling is more he got off on a technicality than was cleared.
The technicality was that when the jury heard all the evidence they couldn't say within all reasonable doubt he's guilty. Which makes him not guilty. I'm not sure he's asking for an apology either. But if someone went out of their way to ruin my career and I was then cleared of the crime I'd be a bit upset with them.
Ennis-Hill has ruined her legacy. She will always be known as the cow with the big mouth who got it wrong. She wasn't wrong to have her opinions - but her silence after he was cleared is disgusting.
e21Mark said:
photosnob said:
She has not been as screamy about apologising to the poor bloke.
I'm not so sure he warrants an apology. My feeling is more he got off on a technicality than was cleared. He was cleared by a jury of his peers.
He is not guilty.
She should apologise, and he should consider legal action against her for lost earnings hahahahahaha
Gassing Station | Football | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff