The Official Scottish Football Thread
Discussion
Just say, for arguement's sake, that Rangers had equalized, or even scraped a win. Given recent woes, I think that would have been quite catastrophic for Celtic, so fair play to them for not bottling it in face of the importance of the tie. All told, I think Celtic can look forward to a season full of hacking, kicking and slightly too long grass 
Terzo123 said:
Dermot Gallagher and Danny Mills on Sky sports saying it should have been a free kick to Celtic.
:-)
Seen that. It was Jack that jumped into Rogic without getting near the ball. I said that at the time. :-)
Having seen all the replays and zoomed in footage I still don't even see any contact from Rogic. Jack got his own legs tangled.
Twice in just a few games Gerrard has wrongly blamed the refs and called the ingretity of the Scottish game into question. I can't see how he can avoid a fine tor warning this time.
Driver101 said:
Seen that. It was Jack that jumped into Rogic without getting near the ball. I said that at the time.
Having seen all the replays and zoomed in footage I still don't even see any contact from Rogic. Jack got his own legs tangled.
Twice in just a few games Gerrard has wrongly blamed the refs and called the ingretity of the Scottish game into question. I can't see how he can avoid a fine tor warning this time.
Rogic taps Jack’s left foot causing him to fall.Having seen all the replays and zoomed in footage I still don't even see any contact from Rogic. Jack got his own legs tangled.
Twice in just a few games Gerrard has wrongly blamed the refs and called the ingretity of the Scottish game into question. I can't see how he can avoid a fine tor warning this time.
simoid said:
Driver101 said:
Seen that. It was Jack that jumped into Rogic without getting near the ball. I said that at the time.
Having seen all the replays and zoomed in footage I still don't even see any contact from Rogic. Jack got his own legs tangled.
Twice in just a few games Gerrard has wrongly blamed the refs and called the ingretity of the Scottish game into question. I can't see how he can avoid a fine tor warning this time.
Rogic taps Jack’s left foot causing him to fall.Having seen all the replays and zoomed in footage I still don't even see any contact from Rogic. Jack got his own legs tangled.
Twice in just a few games Gerrard has wrongly blamed the refs and called the ingretity of the Scottish game into question. I can't see how he can avoid a fine tor warning this time.
simoid said:
Driver101 said:
Seen that. It was Jack that jumped into Rogic without getting near the ball. I said that at the time.
Having seen all the replays and zoomed in footage I still don't even see any contact from Rogic. Jack got his own legs tangled.
Twice in just a few games Gerrard has wrongly blamed the refs and called the ingretity of the Scottish game into question. I can't see how he can avoid a fine tor warning this time.
Rogic taps Jack’s left foot causing him to fall.Having seen all the replays and zoomed in footage I still don't even see any contact from Rogic. Jack got his own legs tangled.
Twice in just a few games Gerrard has wrongly blamed the refs and called the ingretity of the Scottish game into question. I can't see how he can avoid a fine tor warning this time.
simoid said:
Rogic taps Jack’s left foot causing him to fall.
I don't think he does at all. You can't see any contact in any of the videos. It's just people assuming there was contact as Jack went down. It was still Jack who jumped into Rogic to impede him initially. As Gallagher said earlier that was the only potential foul in the incident.
Edited by Driver101 on Monday 3rd September 21:08
No action to be taken against McGregor for his kick. The panel has three members and the decision has to unanimous to proceed.
I've not heard one person think it was anything other than a red card. The only justification anyone put forward to excuse the Moreloss kick was it was retaliation. This time there is no excuse.
Then the guy at Kilmarnock got sent off last week when going for the ball, nobody thought it was a red, but his red card appeal was thrown out.
Two clear red cards and both ignored or overturned to benefit Rangers. Serious questions need to be aimed at the panel.
I've not heard one person think it was anything other than a red card. The only justification anyone put forward to excuse the Moreloss kick was it was retaliation. This time there is no excuse.
Then the guy at Kilmarnock got sent off last week when going for the ball, nobody thought it was a red, but his red card appeal was thrown out.
Two clear red cards and both ignored or overturned to benefit Rangers. Serious questions need to be aimed at the panel.
Driver101 said:
No action to be taken against McGregor for his kick. The panel has three members and the decision has to unanimous to proceed.
I've not heard one person think it was anything other than a red card. The only justification anyone put forward to excuse the Moreloss kick was it was retaliation. This time there is no excuse.
Then the guy at Kilmarnock got sent off last week when going for the ball, nobody thought it was a red, but his red card appeal was thrown out.
Two clear red cards and both ignored or overturned to benefit Rangers. Serious questions need to be aimed at the panel.
Did the ref see McGregor's kick at all? I'm assuming he didn't, otherwise he would have issued the card? I've not heard one person think it was anything other than a red card. The only justification anyone put forward to excuse the Moreloss kick was it was retaliation. This time there is no excuse.
Then the guy at Kilmarnock got sent off last week when going for the ball, nobody thought it was a red, but his red card appeal was thrown out.
Two clear red cards and both ignored or overturned to benefit Rangers. Serious questions need to be aimed at the panel.
JuniorD said:
Did the ref see McGregor's kick at all? I'm assuming he didn't, otherwise he would have issued the card?
They showed in the highlights he did appear to be looking in that direction. If he did see it there is no other result than a red card. To have the benefit of clear video footage and rule no further action to be taken is actually unbelievable. There is quite clearly a wrong one on the panel unable to be impartial.
It now appears that kicking out is now acceptable. I've no idea when they changed the rules.
Driver101 said:
No action to be taken against McGregor for his kick. The panel has three members and the decision has to unanimous to proceed.
I've not heard one person think it was anything other than a red card. The only justification anyone put forward to excuse the Moreloss kick was it was retaliation. This time there is no excuse.
Then the guy at Kilmarnock got sent off last week when going for the ball, nobody thought it was a red, but his red card appeal was thrown out.
Two clear red cards and both ignored or overturned to benefit Rangers. Serious questions need to be aimed at the panel.
Well there were a few on the pitch and at least 1 on the panel. Perhaps people just agree with you?I've not heard one person think it was anything other than a red card. The only justification anyone put forward to excuse the Moreloss kick was it was retaliation. This time there is no excuse.
Then the guy at Kilmarnock got sent off last week when going for the ball, nobody thought it was a red, but his red card appeal was thrown out.
Two clear red cards and both ignored or overturned to benefit Rangers. Serious questions need to be aimed at the panel.
simoid said:
Driver101 said:
No action to be taken against McGregor for his kick. The panel has three members and the decision has to unanimous to proceed.
I've not heard one person think it was anything other than a red card. The only justification anyone put forward to excuse the Moreloss kick was it was retaliation. This time there is no excuse.
Then the guy at Kilmarnock got sent off last week when going for the ball, nobody thought it was a red, but his red card appeal was thrown out.
Two clear red cards and both ignored or overturned to benefit Rangers. Serious questions need to be aimed at the panel.
Well there were a few on the pitch and at least 1 on the panel. Perhaps people just agree with you?I've not heard one person think it was anything other than a red card. The only justification anyone put forward to excuse the Moreloss kick was it was retaliation. This time there is no excuse.
Then the guy at Kilmarnock got sent off last week when going for the ball, nobody thought it was a red, but his red card appeal was thrown out.
Two clear red cards and both ignored or overturned to benefit Rangers. Serious questions need to be aimed at the panel.
simoid said:
Well there were a few on the pitch and at least 1 on the panel. Perhaps people just agree with you?
How could it be anything other than a red card and a penalty?Who on the pitch said it wasn't a red?
Have a little look at people freely offering their opinion on the incident. Even all the Rangers fans, and a manager who is full of excuses, also knows it was a red.
Gassing Station | Football | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff