The Official Manchester United Thread (Vol 11)
Discussion
unident said:
Not a good move for me. I want to see us build a team for the future, not do what Jammy has said. He would have been a great signing when he left Spurs, but not now. Obviously he could turn into a world beater for us, but realistically how long will he be with us. I want to see an end to the older player joining us in their career twilight years. I’m sure someone will tell me that he’s only young, but he’s got a rather significant medical issue that will limit how long he can play for.
We can’t just have a team of youngsters and we need some experience in the side too, which he has plenty of. If Bruno gets injured, who replaces him? Mata has gone, Pogba has gone, Donny wasn’t impressive (although that could change under EtH), Mejbri isn’t ready, Rashford can’t, Sancho can’t and Fred can’t. We need cover there and Eriksen gives us that. He’s the ideal candidate to come in for 2/3 seasons while we work things out imo.GTO-3R said:
We can’t just have a team of youngsters and we need some experience in the side too, which he has plenty of. If Bruno gets injured, who replaces him? Mata has gone, Pogba has gone, Donny wasn’t impressive (although that could change under EtH), Mejbri isn’t ready, Rashford can’t, Sancho can’t and Fred can’t. We need cover there and Eriksen gives us that. He’s the ideal candidate to come in for 2/3 seasons while we work things out imo.
Just an opinion, like I said he may turn out to be a world beater for us. It’s just not the sort of signing I want us to be making. If he’s back-up then it makes more sense, but I really hope we’re going to give people a chance, especially DVB. originals said:
GTO-3R said:
It's a huge gamble that Liverpool have taken on Nunez
GTO-3R said:
Offer gone in for Eriksen according to Ornstein. Would be a good signing on a free for us
Liverpool taking a gamble but not Utd? GTO-3R said:
originals said:
GTO-3R said:
It's a huge gamble that Liverpool have taken on Nunez
GTO-3R said:
Offer gone in for Eriksen according to Ornstein. Would be a good signing on a free for us
Liverpool taking a gamble but not Utd? 57Ford said:
Whether he does or not, we’re definitely playing for higher-stakes with Erikson as per the post earlier. Clearly.
Probably best to wait for the details to play out.If we get 40 for Mane, Nunez costs 24M. What did you get for Mata or Lingard?
If we pay Nunez 100k/week and you pay 200k/ week for Eriksen over 4 years it’s the same cost.
Of course one, either or both might be a massive success which negates any cost premium
Edited by Adam. on Tuesday 14th June 23:18
Adam. said:
Probably best to wait for the details to play out.
If we get 40 for Mane, Nunez costs 24M. What did you get for Mata or Lingard?
If we pay Nunez 100k/week and you pay 200k/ week for Eriksen over 4 years it’s the same cost.
Of course one, either or both might be a massive success which negates any cost premium
What you’re getting for Mane is irrelevant to the deal for Nunez because he’s going anyway and you could just trouser the cash. It’s like us saying Eriksen costs a net -£30m because we sold Beckham. It’s not related unless it’s a part-ex swap between the same clubs. If we get 40 for Mane, Nunez costs 24M. What did you get for Mata or Lingard?
If we pay Nunez 100k/week and you pay 200k/ week for Eriksen over 4 years it’s the same cost.
Of course one, either or both might be a massive success which negates any cost premium
Edited by Adam. on Tuesday 14th June 23:18
My overall point is that even though I would have liked him at our place, it’s a lot of money (and a large amount of your budget I’d imagine) to spend on a young lad who’s only played in a lesser league. Even as an older player, Eriksen’s already proved himself at the highest level.
Edited by 57Ford on Wednesday 15th June 00:11
GTO-3R said:
originals said:
GTO-3R said:
It's a huge gamble that Liverpool have taken on Nunez
GTO-3R said:
Offer gone in for Eriksen according to Ornstein. Would be a good signing on a free for us
Liverpool taking a gamble but not Utd? Pommy said:
GTO-3R said:
originals said:
GTO-3R said:
It's a huge gamble that Liverpool have taken on Nunez
GTO-3R said:
Offer gone in for Eriksen according to Ornstein. Would be a good signing on a free for us
Liverpool taking a gamble but not Utd? If his wages are true then and if he works out, hopefully he won’t, then RM et al will be all over him. It’s the one good season that’s the gamble.
57Ford said:
a large amount of your budget I’d imagine) to spend on a young lad who’s only played in a lesser league. Even as an older player, Eriksen’s already proved himself at the highest level.
Agreed on thatI guess linking this deal with Mane out depends on whether we would have bought Nunez if he and Salah had signed new deals (I suspect not) and whether the 64 was inflated because Benfica knew we had c.40 coming in for Mane.
Comparing a like for like replacement with deals 15 years apart is a bit disingenuous.
I think Eriksen is an odd signing but if viewed as free and he plugs a temporary gap it makes sense
Adam. said:
I think Eriksen is an odd signing but if viewed as free and he plugs a temporary gap it makes sense
We’ve lost 3 attacking midfielders this week in Pogba lingard and Mata. Good squad addition Eriksen. Mata was heavily involved towards the season close once Pogba decided he wasn’t playing anymore. Gassing Station | Football | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff