The Official Manchester United Thread [Vol 5]

[anonymous-user]

Cie said:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

What have you done? Won't we need to get through the qualifying games for that money?

Well done.

Thats what I said, if we qualify.

We'll be fine, we'll have Bale, Ronaldo and Messi

[anniesdad]

I'd take Kane in a heartbeat. Proper striker.

[anonymous-user]

anniesdad said:

I'd take Kane in a heartbeat. Proper striker.

For 45m?

[anniesdad]

Yes, I expect Woodward/Levy to negotiate

[anniesdad]

Rooney was c.£30M 11 years ago.

[m3sye]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Does it affect you ?

[Black can man]

anniesdad said:

I'd take Kane in a heartbeat. Proper striker.

Who wouldn't ?

Just Keyser it seems.

[anniesdad]

Black can man said:

anniesdad said:

I'd take Kane in a heartbeat. Proper striker.

Who wouldn't ?

Just Keyser it seems.

Do you think he'll leave?

[anonymous-user]

m3sye said:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Does it affect you ?

As a fan yes. Kane isn't a 45m player yet. 25-30 maybe, but Levy loves his Utd tax. But then the bar is set for a young promising striker who manages a decent season and they are all 45m. Then we have to listen to the Spuds moaning on about money ruining the game.

[Cie]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Or Scousers mentioning net spend. Even though it doesn't affect them.

[Black can man]

anniesdad said:

Black can man said:

anniesdad said:

I'd take Kane in a heartbeat. Proper striker.

Who wouldn't ?

Just Keyser it seems.

Do you think he'll leave?

I've said all along that if the price is right Levy will sell.

sadly.

[Cie]

I don't know about Keyser, but for me point is for £45m. If he was half that then I'd be delighted. I think we can spend that kind of money somewhere else and it'll help the team more. If it doesn't change our spending for other positions then it wouldn't be so bad, but I do think it's very steep. Same reasons I'd be embarrassed if we signed Bale for the figures reported.

[anonymous-user]

Cie said:

I don't know about Keyser, but for me point is for £45m. If he was half that then I'd be delighted. I think we can spend that kind of money somewhere else and it'll help the team more. If it doesn't change our spending for other positions then it wouldn't be so bad, but I do think it's very steep. Same reasons I'd be embarrassed if we signed Bale for the figures reported.

Its not that I don't rate Kane I said as much on the Spud thread but 45m is madness

Have 15m and Nani or Chich and yeah cool

[m3sye]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

it makes fk all difference to you if its 30 or 45m - prices to watch will not go down

You would soon forget 45m if he bagged 25 for you

[anonymous-user]

m3sye said:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

it makes fk all difference to you if its 30 or 45m - prices to watch will not go down

You would soon forget 45m if he bagged 25 for you

We disagree, c'est la vie

[Cie]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

What a song that is.

[NailedOn]

Apologies of this is a pea-roast.
Andy Mitten on Yahoo Sport is very certain that DDG has declined £200k/week to go to Real.
Even being the highest paid keeper in the world and playing ECL footy cannot, apparently, persuade him and his Mrs. to stay at United.
Tough life being a superstar's spouse then...

[London424]

Not that I think there's any truth in it, but surely Luke Shaw sets your target price range.

You paid 34mil for a young English defender that had done nothing of note. Kane is a young English forward with a 30 goal season to his name and an international goal.

Then add the new TV deal and his new 5 year contract and he's going nowhere cheap.

[m3sye]

London424 said:

Not that I think there's any truth in it, but surely Luke Shaw sets your target price range.

You paid 34mil for a young English defender that had done nothing of note. Kane is a young English forward with a 30 goal season to his name and an international goal.

Then add the new TV deal and his new 5 year contract and he's going nowhere cheap.

totally agree - shaw at 30m + means without doubt you pay 40m+ for Kane

[Cie]

I don't know who your post is aimed at. If it's me or Keyser then yeah, that's why we don't want him, because we'd spend a stupid amount on him. You wouldn't find us saying £30m for Shaw was a good price either.