Space Launch System - Orion

Space Launch System - Orion

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Wednesday 7th November 2018
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
Well the senate has deep pockets, so your subconscious is just reflecting NASA's budget realities. smile
My concscious wasn't that "sub".

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Friday 7th December 2018
quotequote all
Blimey - that brings back memories.

One of the parts of the 2014 flight test that didn't work perfectly was the righting bag inflation test - if I recall correctly.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Friday 7th December 2018
quotequote all
I think Crewed Dragon is now going to be splashing down too.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Friday 7th December 2018
quotequote all
We know they can do splashdowns safely because all the uncrewed Dragons have splashed down. SpaceX's recovery operations are pretty streamlined and don't require the US Navy Pacific Fleet to be on station.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Thursday 13th December 2018
quotequote all
Didn't go bang at least.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Thursday 13th December 2018
quotequote all

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Saturday 12th January 2019
quotequote all
That's because it IS essentially a Shuttle External Tank extended to increase fuel capacity and therefore the burn time of the engines. It's also feeding four Shuttle Main Engines as opposed to the three of the original tank.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Saturday 12th January 2019
quotequote all
Naturally. The thrust is now being applied directly to the base of the tank. On the Shuttle the thrust was offset.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Sunday 13th January 2019
quotequote all
A lander to land where?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Sunday 13th January 2019
quotequote all
Thanks for clarifying. No formal funding for a moon lander has been approved - yet. There was tentative planning for a moon lander when the Constellation project was on the go,. That lander was called Altair and conceptual artwork was released of what it might look like -




Altair was cancelled when Constellation was cancelled.

A few months ago, NASA did issue some new specifications for possible lunar landers which would use the SLS system - so we may see something like Altair yet - but not for at least ten years.

Orion is currently going to be used as an end in itself - and to ferry to and from a lunar space station. There are no definite plans to have a lunar landing aspect to SLS missions.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Sunday 13th January 2019
quotequote all
Have both I say.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Monday 14th January 2019
quotequote all
I remember seeing paintings like that in the 1960s.This concept was studied quite well in the book "Frontiers of Space".







Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Wednesday 16th January 2019
quotequote all
Depending on what test they are carrying out, they will.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Thursday 17th January 2019
quotequote all
Time was of the essence. Quick solutions were needed.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Tuesday 12th March 2019
quotequote all
It looks to me that Trump's one excellent appointment has been Jim Bridenstine. He certainly seems to be giving NASA some definite and sensible focus.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Tuesday 12th March 2019
quotequote all
MartG said:
Scott Manley video on the latest SLS budget news

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wb3pGNTIC4c&fe...
Interesting. SLS might still hang on.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Wednesday 13th March 2019
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Nasa are looking at sending Orion on a commercials rocket for the 2020 moon mission.

SLS is officially dead.
Source?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Tuesday 26th March 2019
quotequote all
Yep - empty talk by an empty vessel.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Wednesday 27th March 2019
quotequote all
I'm sure they couldn't - especially since Grumman as a company no longer exists.

The new generation lander will be a very different animal to the minimalist Lunar Module built by Grumman. It's only a month or so since NASA issued their current lunar lander requirements to the US aerospace industry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hx20ca_poQ

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,345 posts

267 months

Wednesday 27th March 2019
quotequote all
Talk about mixed messages. The expressions "arse" and "elbow" comes to mind.