Scientists. PAH!

Author
Discussion

Alex

9,975 posts

285 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
XJSsometimeSoon said:
Jetl3on said:
Painful reading, but I do wonder if Scientists make up half the stuff they discover, safe in the knowledge that nobody can disprove their "facts".

Metro:
"The mystery of evolution - we are descended from primitive eel-like creatures. The 2" Pikaia gracilens lived in the sea more than 500million years ago. But scientists from Cambridge and Toronto have confirmed it is the member of the Chordate family, to which humans belong, it used to swim like an eeel, skimming the sea floor".
EFA

Really pisses me off when a species name is not in italics
Best spelling and grammar police ever. smile

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
carmonk said:
This thread has been infected by stupid and should be quarantined.
Ye'll nae tek me alive, laddie...hehe

otolith

56,512 posts

205 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
This thread was infected in utero.

XJSsometimeSoon

378 posts

160 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
oh dear

Mr Gear

9,416 posts

191 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
otolith said:
This thread was infected in utero.
It was stupid the second the title was typed.

I thought it had been known for a long time that humans have lamprey-like creatures as a common ancestor with all other vertebrates.

Eric Mc

122,174 posts

266 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Jetl3on said:
haha, I was expecting that. Dont get defensive, it was a tongue in cheek comment, im not dissing your importance and contribution to society, It would be great to see some consistency in your findings, you lot are always disproving and contradicting each other (yes I know, thats the route to discovery).

I cannot argue the finer points and wont attempt to, but just because you found some infinitely minute common atom or organism between species, does not necessarily mean we `descended` from them. Its the descended part I dont like I guess, making it seem grander than it is.

And whilst we are on the subject of "what did you do for us", alongside all the good you have done, you are also responsible for some equally nasty stuff, nothing to be proud of.

On the whole you are a necessary evil smile

Edited by Jetl3on on Tuesday 6th March 15:37
Why are scientists "evil"?

Ignorance and willingness to dismiss the work of sciience is far more "evil" to my mind.

XJSsometimeSoon

378 posts

160 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Alex said:
XJSsometimeSoon said:
Jetl3on said:
Painful reading, but I do wonder if Scientists make up half the stuff they discover, safe in the knowledge that nobody can disprove their "facts".

Metro:
"The mystery of evolution - we are descended from primitive eel-like creatures. The 2" Pikaia gracilens lived in the sea more than 500million years ago. But scientists from Cambridge and Toronto have confirmed it is the member of the Chordate family, to which humans belong, it used to swim like an eeel, skimming the sea floor".
EFA

Really pisses me off when a species name is not in italics
Best spelling and grammar police ever. smile
[Rant]
I am not usually this much of a pedant, however it really does boil my blood. Also they missed out who is authority (i.e who named the species) and did not put their initial at the end of the species name. Basics of any writing in biological sciences.
For example at the moment I am writing about Ginkgo biloba which was first formally described and given a taxonomic position by Carl Linnaeus. So in any article it should first read Ginkgo biloba L.
I cannot be arsed to look up the authority on Pikaia gracilens but it is very sloppy not to get it correct.
[/Rant]
As you were...

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Why are scientists "evil"?

Ignorance and willingness to dismiss the work of sciience is far more "evil" to my mind.
How do you view climate scientists, Eric..? hehe



XJSsometimeSoon

378 posts

160 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
How do you view climate scientists, Eric..? hehe
Oxymoron

PugwasHDJ80

7,541 posts

222 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Jetl3on said:
haha, I was expecting that. Dont get defensive, it was a tongue in cheek comment, im not dissing your importance and contribution to society, It would be great to see some consistency in your findings, you lot are always disproving and contradicting each other (yes I know, thats the route to discovery).

I cannot argue the finer points and wont attempt to, but just because you found some infinitely minute common atom or organism between species, does not necessarily mean we `descended` from them. Its the descended part I dont like I guess, making it seem grander than it is.

And whilst we are on the subject of "what did you do for us", alongside all the good you have done, you are also responsible for some equally nasty stuff, nothing to be proud of.

On the whole you are a necessary evil smile

Edited by Jetl3on on Tuesday 6th March 15:37
so much fail........

Eric Mc

122,174 posts

266 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Eric Mc said:
Why are scientists "evil"?

Ignorance and willingness to dismiss the work of sciience is far more "evil" to my mind.
How do you view climate scientists, Eric..? hehe
The same as all scientists. If their science turns out to be wrong, we will know eventually.

Science is a process, not a belief system.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
mybrainhurts said:
Eric Mc said:
Why are scientists "evil"?

Ignorance and willingness to dismiss the work of sciience is far more "evil" to my mind.
How do you view climate scientists, Eric..? hehe
The same as all scientists. If their science turns out to be wrong, we will know eventually.
Come on, Eric, keep up...hehe

Eric Mc said:
Science is a process, not a belief system.
To them, it IS a belief system. They call it "The Cause".

Eric Mc

122,174 posts

266 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Do they?

Really?

Science is self correcting. If a theory turns out to be rubbish, that will emerge - eventually.
Scientists themselves are human and will have foibles and flaws like the rest of us. And consequently, if I don't like what one group might be saying, that is of no real relevance to me and doesn't affect my faith in the process of science.

I don't believe in scientists, I believe that it's the scientific process that is what is all important.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Eric, wake up. This bunch has screwed the scientific process. Read the emails.

Jetl3on

Original Poster:

1,409 posts

197 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Jetl3on said:
haha, I was expecting that. Dont get defensive, it was a tongue in cheek comment, im not dissing your importance and contribution to society, It would be great to see some consistency in your findings, you lot are always disproving and contradicting each other (yes I know, thats the route to discovery).

I cannot argue the finer points and wont attempt to, but just because you found some infinitely minute common atom or organism between species, does not necessarily mean we `descended` from them. Its the descended part I dont like I guess, making it seem grander than it is.

And whilst we are on the subject of "what did you do for us", alongside all the good you have done, you are also responsible for some equally nasty stuff, nothing to be proud of.

On the whole you are a necessary evil smile

Edited by Jetl3on on Tuesday 6th March 15:37
Why are scientists "evil"?

Ignorance and willingness to dismiss the work of sciience is far more "evil" to my mind.
Misunderstood me Eric, your not evil in the sense of the word, its a term of endearment, your like Fluffy Handcuffs or guilty pleasures, you bring greatness and destruction in (un)equal measures.

Eric Mc

122,174 posts

266 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Are you talking to me?

Do you think I am a scientist?

Looking at the attrocious spelling and the totally silly statements you are making, I do not think your comments are worth responding to, in all honesty.

What on earth are you basing your opinions on?

Simpo Two

85,789 posts

266 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
I feel that anyone who wishes to say evolution is wrong should put forward a valid alternative. Saying 'Mr Magic did it' is not enough.

deeen

6,081 posts

246 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Jetl3on said:
I cannot argue the finer points and wont attempt to, but just because you found some infinitely minute common atom or organism between species, does not necessarily mean we `descended` from them. Its the descended part I dont like I guess, making it seem grander than it is.


Edited by Jetl3on on Tuesday 6th March 15:37
"Descended from" as in evolved from, through a large number of generations the eel-like thing with a nascent backbone became a human, we are descended from them, what is "grand" or "not grand" about that?

deadtom

2,583 posts

166 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Eric, wake up. This bunch has screwed the scientific process. Read the emails.
The Michael Mann/climategate emails you mean?

all involved were cleared of any wrongdoing by the Inspector General of the National Science Foundation, an internal investigations by Penn State University, and an independent panel at University of East Anglia too.

http://live.psu.edu/story/47378
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-08-22/climate-c...
http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/CRUstate...

I can't pretend to know enough about climate change in general to put forward my own arguments about it, but is the climategate argument really still a valid one?

surely if climate change really isnt our own doing, there will be strength of evidence enough to disprove the currently accepted theory that it is, even if the other side really were screwing around.

Edited by deadtom on Tuesday 6th March 21:48

Jetl3on

Original Poster:

1,409 posts

197 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Calm down sir, if you want to debate, lets debate, but please refrain from using aggressive or insulting comments, its uncalled for. My comments were (and I repeat) 'tongue in cheek', but i have my opinions on the subject, which Im entitled to.

And yes, if it were not clear the first time, Im talking to you.