Physics book: what's worth reading?

Physics book: what's worth reading?

Author
Discussion

turbobloke

104,288 posts

261 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
With apologies to the OP for not keeping to the last 10 years, but if anyone hasn't read 'Violent Phenomena in the Universe' by Prof J V Narlikar, it's definitely worth a read. Scouting through decent second hand bookshops or a couple of quid via the internet will get a superb and distinctly alternative treatment of high energy processes.

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
m1dg3 said:
If you're looking for popular science then one of the best I've read is 'Afterglow of Creation' by Marcus Chown about the discovery of the cosmic background radiation. You can't go wrong with Feynman either.

Not from the last ten years but A-level barely gets you into the 20th century physics-wise.
I like Science of Discworld.
Very interesting read for me.

Laplace

1,090 posts

183 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
carmonk said:
QED - Richard Feynman. Sounds boring but is amazing, if short

The Elegant Universe - Brian Greene
Two excellent books!

The fabric of the cosmos by Brian Greene is also very good.

g3org3y

20,676 posts

192 months

Monday 30th January 2012
quotequote all
andy_s said:
I've read Hawkins, 'Brief History of Time' & 'Grand Design'
Read both and thought them ok. BHOT was interesting but I felt the style of writing didn't make it particularly accesible. GD was also ok, interesting in parts (although its opening line of 'philosophy is dead' was a little off base) but sometimes I found myself drifting off when he talks about the highly theoretical stuff (11 dimensions etc) especially when there is little/no evidence basis.

Marcus Chown's 'Quantum Theory Cannot Hurt You' is decent, explained well and an entertaining read. Same can be applied to Simon Singh's 'Big Bang'.

I've got Chown's 'We need to talk about Kelvin' - it's on the 'to read' list.

MixxyMatosis

388 posts

170 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
I'm currently reading "How to teach quantum physics to your dog" by Chad Orzel. I highly recommend it for all the beginners out there. Everything is explained very simply by bunny and squirrel metaphors and is quite an amusing read.

K12beano

20,854 posts

276 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
biggrin ^^^ Sounds great!!!

jbudgie

8,977 posts

213 months

Tuesday 31st January 2012
quotequote all
g3org3y said:
andy_s said:
I've read Hawkins, 'Brief History of Time' & 'Grand Design'
Read both and thought them ok. BHOT was interesting but I felt the style of writing didn't make it particularly accesible. GD was also ok, interesting in parts (although its opening line of 'philosophy is dead' was a little off base) but sometimes I found myself drifting off when he talks about the highly theoretical stuff (11 dimensions etc) especially when there is little/no evidence basis.

Marcus Chown's 'Quantum Theory Cannot Hurt You' is decent, explained well and an entertaining read. Same can be applied to Simon Singh's 'Big Bang'.

I've got Chown's 'We need to talk about Kelvin' - it's on the 'to read' list.
I think if you read Brian Greene's book--'The Elegant Universe' about string theory then you might give it some credence.

Road Pest

3,123 posts

199 months

Wednesday 1st February 2012
quotequote all
2 Books i've read... Schrodinger's Cat, John Gribbon and Programming the Universe, Seth Lloyd. Just got the follow on by John Gribbon, Schrodinger's Kittens.

g3org3y

20,676 posts

192 months

Thursday 2nd February 2012
quotequote all
jbudgie said:
g3org3y said:
andy_s said:
I've read Hawkins, 'Brief History of Time' & 'Grand Design'
Read both and thought them ok. BHOT was interesting but I felt the style of writing didn't make it particularly accesible. GD was also ok, interesting in parts (although its opening line of 'philosophy is dead' was a little off base) but sometimes I found myself drifting off when he talks about the highly theoretical stuff (11 dimensions etc) especially when there is little/no evidence basis.

Marcus Chown's 'Quantum Theory Cannot Hurt You' is decent, explained well and an entertaining read. Same can be applied to Simon Singh's 'Big Bang'.

I've got Chown's 'We need to talk about Kelvin' - it's on the 'to read' list.
I think if you read Brian Greene's book--'The Elegant Universe' about string theory then you might give it some credence.
Will check it out, thanks for the advice. Always loved the old episodes of Horizon (before it started getting 'commercial') that discussed highly theoretic quantum physics I just feel that I don't get on with Hawking's writing style.

If anyone is looking for a whistle-stop tour of science at a more basic level I can heartily recommend Bill Bryson's Short History of Everything.

Flibble

6,476 posts

182 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
shoggoth1 said:
Another Richard P. Feynman:

Six Easy Pieces.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Six-Easy-Pieces-Fundamenta...
A good book, doesn't require a degree in physics (or indeed anything).

S6PNJ

5,190 posts

282 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
Not books, per say, but the new iTunes U has been released, and looking earlier they have a great deal of free course material from universities all over. Video of lectures, course notes, transcripts, etc. some folks might find it interesting, and useful.
I quite like the idea of this, shame you need an iPad, iPhone or Touch to view - why can iTunes display it as well? Says iOS5 req'd - I haven't downloaded to check if it works in iTunes but as it doesn't say so I'm guessing not.

jbudgie

8,977 posts

213 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Brian Greene's new book called 'The Hidden Reality' has just been released in paperback this week.

In it he discusses the theory of multiple universes.

Have just ordered a copy from amazon.

uktrailmonster

4,827 posts

201 months

Monday 6th February 2012
quotequote all
The illustrated version of Hawking's Brief History of Time is better than the original (I've read both). The lesser known sequel 'The Universe in a Nutshell' is also a good read.

aww999

2,068 posts

262 months

Tuesday 7th February 2012
quotequote all
I'm in astro, rather than quantum physics, but thoroughly enjoyed this

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Quantum-Einstein-Debate-Na...

It's written for the layman really, but has a great treatment of the science and tells some very interesting stories about the personalities involved.

physprof

996 posts

188 months

Tuesday 7th February 2012
quotequote all
carmonk said:
QED - Richard Feynman. Sounds boring but is amazing, if short
This!

physprof

996 posts

188 months

Tuesday 7th February 2012
quotequote all
...and instead of a book..... here is how to approach physics ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m37V5bC86Ic&fea...

from 1:40 - 2:50 particularly...... but watch the 11 mins...its a compilation.

the other clips from this series are excellent.

PineBarren

508 posts

181 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
MixxyMatosis said:
I'm currently reading "How to teach quantum physics to your dog" by Chad Orzel. I highly recommend it for all the beginners out there. Everything is explained very simply by bunny and squirrel metaphors and is quite an amusing read.
Totally agree. I found understanding topics such as polarisation much easier to understand when a dog and squirrel are involved

Halb

53,012 posts

184 months

Sunday 1st July 2012
quotequote all
The Long Earth is out now, for those interested in fiction about alternate dimensions.

spikeyhead

17,417 posts

198 months

Sunday 1st July 2012
quotequote all
Bedazzled said:
I'm about half way through Brian Cox's "why does e=mc2". The layman's description of relativity is very good but it's ruined by the explanation of the twins' paradox, where he gives a brief geometric answer and then says "we'll just quote the results because the maths is a bit beyond this book". Riiight.

He keeps appologising for using maths and then embeds all the formulae in the text without showing the step by step substitutions, which actually makes it harder to follow. Here's an example, I still can't get my head around the bit highlighted in yellow...



I hope the second half of the book is better, my brain is feeling a bit frazzled at the moment. It's not a patch on Feynman's lectures, imo.
Ah, the good old 1/sqrt(1-((v^2)/(c^2)))

It's a factor that appears again and again in relativity

If you put that formula into excel then draw a graph with v as the speed starting out at 1e7m/s increasing up 3e8m/s and you can see the effect getting closer to the speed of light has.

So the extra energy required to make something move at 0.9 x the speed of light or similar can be found using this.