SpaceX Tuesday...
Discussion
F20CN16 said:
2 engines were running very close to the ground there. Earlier flights were one 1 engine by then. Interesting.
Bacause of that the whole landing looked slower andmuch more controlled resulting in a nice gentle touch down. (Though I have to confess I keep loading up one of the feeds to check it's still there!)
Buzz84 said:
F20CN16 said:
2 engines were running very close to the ground there. Earlier flights were one 1 engine by then. Interesting.
Bacause of that the whole landing looked slower andmuch more controlled resulting in a nice gentle touch down. (Though I have to confess I keep loading up one of the feeds to check it's still there!)
Just remember that 13 years ago this guy was going bankrupt and couldn’t get a little single engined rocket to orbit - indeed look at the first few pages of this very thread. What an achievement.
Hopefully SpaceX will release their recorded footage, such a shame their live stuff dropped out so badly.
A bit late now for the vintage champagne I’d been saving - I’ll have that tomorrow and a martini now.
Cheers!
F20CN16 said:
Eric Mc said:
Can a Starship achieve orbit on its own? I thought it needed to be bolted to the much more powerful 1st stage (the Super Heavy).
Which planet’s orbit? or indeed moon!But from earth, I believe that’s a no.
Likewise, superheavy (the booster section) is supposed to be able to do this too, with no payload.
As an aside, Musk has confirmed on twitter a while ago that an F9 booster has the performance to get to LEO as an SSTO with no payload.
Beati Dogu said:
The engines during the flight looked a very good. No random fires on them this time.
The fire on landing seems to be out now and they’re venting the tanks to safe the rocket.
The whole thing seems a bit “crisper”, or maybe that is wilful thinking over a ropey video link. No fires on ascent, seemed to be less shaking and weird noises. There were some sharp bangs when it was burning on the pad at the end, not sure of that was some pressure relief popping out. The fire on landing seems to be out now and they’re venting the tanks to safe the rocket.
Quite apart from the achievement (‘which is amazing, and one day I want to see it do that live on a cloudless day), it’s the pace that is extraordinary. In the space of a fortnight, they’ve launched crew to the ISS, they’ve brought back crew from the ISS, they’ve launched 60 satellites, and flown a Starship. That’s a better cadence that all of the worlds space agencies combined. Amazing.
Beati Dogu said:
They went back to autogenous pressurisation of the tanks with this one, so no helium it seems.
Also landing on two engines was new. So they must be able to throttle them back further than before.
First thing I noticed as well. They had to solve that redundancy problem I think, probably lucky in the long run that it hit them at the beginning, rather than later on.Also landing on two engines was new. So they must be able to throttle them back further than before.
CraigyMc said:
F20CN16 said:
Eric Mc said:
Can a Starship achieve orbit on its own? I thought it needed to be bolted to the much more powerful 1st stage (the Super Heavy).
Which planet’s orbit? or indeed moon!But from earth, I believe that’s a no.
Likewise, superheavy (the booster section) is supposed to be able to do this too, with no payload.
As an aside, Musk has confirmed on twitter a while ago that an F9 booster has the performance to get to LEO as an SSTO with no payload.
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff