Driving Licence confusion.

Driving Licence confusion.

Author
Discussion

Humper

946 posts

163 months

Thursday 14th March 2013
quotequote all
Im just glad I passed my class one years ago. smile

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Thursday 14th March 2013
quotequote all
So: if my correct total weight limit ( wink ) is correctly identified as 8.25 tonnes, who will have a C1E limit of 12 tonnes?

My own example seems to match the other fellows in that we have a pre-'97 car licence with grandfathered C1 entitlement, and a post-'97 class c entitlement.

If I have understood correctly R0G has stated that he should be able to drive a C1E combination weighing up to 12 tonnes, with a C1E and a C1E(107) entitlement on his licence.

mph1977

12,467 posts

169 months

Thursday 14th March 2013
quotequote all
R0G said:
mph1977 said:
the scientist in me objects to weight and mass being used interchangably ...
Max Total Mass ... if that refers to actual weight then its GTW
If it refers to max possible weight then its MAM/GVW

What do you mean by MTM ?
maximum train mass

R0G

4,987 posts

156 months

Thursday 14th March 2013
quotequote all
mph1977 said:
maximum train mass
What most call GTW

mph1977

12,467 posts

169 months

Thursday 14th March 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
So: if my correct total weight limit ( wink ) is correctly identified as 8.25 tonnes, who will have a C1E limit of 12 tonnes?

My own example seems to match the other fellows in that we have a pre-'97 car licence with grandfathered C1 entitlement, and a post-'97 class c entitlement.

If I have understood correctly R0G has stated that he should be able to drive a C1E combination weighing up to 12 tonnes, with a C1E and a C1E(107) entitlement on his licence.
people who have passed the DSA test for either C1E or C+E

R0G

4,987 posts

156 months

Thursday 14th March 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
So: if my correct total weight limit ( wink ) is correctly identified as 8.25 tonnes, who will have a C1E limit of 12 tonnes?

My own example seems to match the other fellows in that we have a pre-'97 car licence with grandfathered C1 entitlement, and a post-'97 class c entitlement.

If I have understood correctly R0G has stated that he should be able to drive a C1E combination weighing up to 12 tonnes, with a C1E and a C1E(107) entitlement on his licence.
Examples ....

Pre 97 C1+E
Vehicle 7.5 tonnes GVW + trailer 750 kgs MAM = 8250 kgs
Vehicle 5 tonnes GVW + trailer 3.25 tonnes MAM = 8250 kgs

DSA pass C1+E (covered by C+E)
Vehicle 7.5 tonnes GVW + trailer 6.5 tonnes MAM but max actual weight (GTW) limited to 12 tonnes

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Thursday 14th March 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
R0G said:
NOTE:- a driver who has a pre 1997 C1 and also passes C will have another hidden C1 as C1 is a subcategory of C - this is also the case for those passing CE who have a pre 1997 C1E but the two C1Es in this case will be different .... see below

C1E = any rigid vehicle not more than 7500 GVW with not more than a total of 9 seats but can tow a trailer of any MAM but restricted to 12000 GTW (actual total weight for both when weighed together)

C1E with 107 restriction code (free for pre 1997 car licence holders) = any rigid vehicle not more than 7500 GVW with not more than a total of 9 seats towing a trailer where the total of the vehicle GVW added to the trailer MAM is not more than 8250 kgs - the higher the trailer MAM then the lower the vehicle GVW must be or vice-versa which allows the 8250 to be flexible
R0G, I have a grandfathered C1 & C1E entitlement and I also have a post '97 C entitlement.

My licence lists C, C1 & C1E (107) meaning that Im limited to 8,250kgs with no obvious 12 tonne entitlment on the C1E (which Ive always wondered about).

Your post has reminded me of this - have I understood it correctly, or should I be limited to 8.25 tonnes?
Confusion caused by reading your original post whilst working - have now sat at my desk at home with a cup of tea and re-read it and I see that the unemcumbered C1E at 12 tonnes comes with a grandfathered C1 and a post '97 C+E...

As we were then. hehe

R0G

4,987 posts

156 months

Thursday 14th March 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
I see that the unemcumbered C1E at 12 tonnes comes with a grandfathered C1 and a post '97 C+E...
Take out - a grandfathered C1 - then you will be correct

Isuzu

5 posts

77 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
Guest ion I have a c1+e code107 passed test before 1997 my truck 7.5 tonne artic total GVW 8.250 is it legal for me to drive on that licence thanks phil

R0G

4,987 posts

156 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
Isuzu said:
Guest ion I have a c1+e code107 passed test before 1997 my truck 7.5 tonne artic total GVW 8.250 is it legal for me to drive on that licence thanks phil
What is the GVW on the towing unit ?
What is the plated weight on the trailer ?

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
If he passed the old Class 3 or Class 2 test then surely he will have a grandfathered C+E allowing him to drive drag and draws, and enabling him to exceed the (107) restriction on his 2nd C1 licence group (for others: I have C1 twice on my licence, once due to my grandfathered entitlement and once courtesy of my C entitlement, which expires with my C).

R0G

4,987 posts

156 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
GC8 said:
If he passed the old Class 3 or Class 2 test then surely he will have a grandfathered C+E allowing him to drive drag and draws, and enabling him to exceed the (107) restriction on his 2nd C1 licence group (for others: I have C1 twice on my licence, once due to my grandfathered entitlement and once courtesy of my C entitlement, which expires with my C).
He did not mention that - just that he has a basic pre 1997 licence

imagineifyeswill

1,226 posts

167 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
I passed my car test in 1978 so have the grandfather right to drive 7.5 tonners. For many years I managed a recovery company so have been through all this regulations many times. Until I changed my address in 1999 I still had the old paper licence, when I recieved my photocard licence it had the 107 restriction code, this was not on the old paper licence it said 12tonnes with no code.

Isuzu

5 posts

77 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
GVW on truck 8.250 truck weighs about 2.800 tons and trailer 5.000gvw trailer

R0G

4,987 posts

156 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
Isuzu said:
GVW on truck 8.250 truck weighs about 2.800 tons and trailer 5.000gvw trailer
If the GVW (not GTW) listed for the truck/unit/mover is 8250kg then that needs a LGV C licence to drive it and if that is the case then with a trailer plated at 5000 the licence needed will be C+E

The actual weight of the vehicle or trailer is irrelevant in regards to licencing issues

Please post what the only the plates state on the truck/mover and the trailer only to get a definitive answer


shovelheadrob

1,564 posts

172 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
I've just recently taken the C1+e test in order to legally use my American F350 & 5th wheel trailer, truck gvw 5500kg, trailer gvw 5240, actual weight all up is 8150kg, I already had C1E (107) & dropping the weight limit on the truck wouldn't work due to pin weight, the test was a bit of a joke (for me anyway) as it bears no relationship with what I'm going to be using it for. It is basically a B+E test in a slightly larger vehicle, I took mine using an Iveco Dailly box van (6000kg plated weight) with a 3500kg 12ft box trailer, but it means everything is above board. I do have a copy of a letter from VOSA saying that it's the actual weights not the plated weights that should be used to determine if an offence has been committed, which makes more sense otherwise it's like getting prosecuted for speeding because your car is capable of exceeding the limit.

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
R0G said:
GC8 said:
If he passed the old Class 3 or Class 2 test then surely he will have a grandfathered C+E allowing him to drive drag and draws, and enabling him to exceed the (107) restriction on his 2nd C1 licence group (for others: I have C1 twice on my licence, once due to my grandfathered entitlement and once courtesy of my C entitlement, which expires with my C).
He did not mention that - just that he has a basic pre 1997 licence
As I understand it, that is exactly what he has said?

Getragdogleg said:
One lad passed his car test in Feb. 1992, he then went on to do the old Class 2 in october 1997.

Isuzu

5 posts

77 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
Hi Gc8,& dog my licence obtained 1980s car licence up to to 7.5 ton the truck Gvw8.250& trailer 5.000

iguana

7,044 posts

261 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
shovelheadrob said:
I do have a copy of a letter from VOSA saying that it's the actual weights not the plated weights that should be used to determine if an offence has been committed, which makes more sense otherwise it's like getting prosecuted for speeding because your car is capable of exceeding the limit.
Agreed totally on how it should work, however I know 2 guys who got done in the same wk 1O7 restriction & not even close to the weight, one was even totally empty, 6.5t van (1Ot train) 3.5t trailer so weighing 5t as weighed, but both prosecuted.

I down rated the 1Ot train on an Iveco to the 1O7 825Okg on the dvla plate to save issues & let 1O7 restriction drivers drive it, cost something like £28 with dvla. Purely paper work thing no inspection needed.

Edited by iguana on Monday 25th December 18:18

shovelheadrob

1,564 posts

172 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
iguana said:
Agreed totally on how it should work, however I know 2 guys who got done in the same wk 1O7 restriction & not even close to the weight, one was even totally empty, 6.5t van (1Ot train) 3.5t trailer so weighing 5t as weighed, but both prosecuted.

I down rated the 1Ot train on an Iveco to the 1O7 825Okg on the dvla plate to save issues & let 1O7 restriction drivers drive it, cost something like £28 with dvla. Purely paper work thing no inspection needed.

Edited by iguana on Monday 25th December 18:18
That's interesting, did they actually go to court or just accept a fixed penalty? As far as I was aware this hasn't been tested in court.