The ultimate Q-Cars?

Author
Discussion

L100NYY

35,235 posts

244 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
jamieboy said:
How about a Volvo 440 Turbo? Horrible to look at, nasty to drive, but much, much quicker than people expect. Note - that's quicker, not quick.

L100NYY said:
Lancia Thema 8.32, Ferrari 3.2 V8 engine...0-60mph in 5.2 secs iirc?

I really like these, but I'm pretty sure it was based on the 3.0 litre from the 308 - I think 8.32 was 8 cylinders 32 valves.

0-60 in 5.2 sounds too quick - over a second quicker than the 308 - but I'll let justayellowbadge correct one or the other of us.


Indeed you are correct, it was in fact the 308 and not the 328 engine. I only said it was to test who was awake today! Alright then perhaps I just had a senior moment, seem to be having a lot of those lately!

As for the 0-60, I too thought that 5.2 secs sounded too quick but I went by some road test figures that I came across, which I reckon are a wee bit optimistic!

Edited to add that it actually says 7.2secs. Doh, me not stooopid!

>> Edited by L100NYY on Thursday 1st December 13:37

pentoman

4,814 posts

264 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
It wouldn't exactly be a surprise to see a fast Subaru, BMW or even Jag so I don't think any of these are Q-cars. I like the dolomite sprint thingy, the Lancia and maybe a old old shape Audi S6 plus with the 32v 4.2 V8



Bet noone knew those existed!

JonRB

74,879 posts

273 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
900T-R said:
It also says that over the course of three years, the guy that built it went through 40,000 Dutch guilders (£13K ish) and six girlfriends!
Excellent. A real labour of love then.

I think this car has to qualify for "Ultimate Sleeper", surely?

Having said that, wasn't there a Renault 4 van on eBay a while back that was basically a rebodied Esprit? That sounds a laugh too.

JonRB

74,879 posts

273 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
pentoman said:
It wouldn't exactly be a surprise to see a fast Subaru
Granted, not these days. However in the early 90's Subarus were virtually unheard-of outside the farming community and had a reputation as being reliable, yet dull, on-off roaders. The Impreza Turbo shattered the mould and for a few glorious years was a real Q-car.
Sadly it is now a victim of its own success, but that is another story.

clapham993

11,339 posts

244 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
Ribol said:
Mercedes 450 SEL 6.9, long time ago but it was a great car, very underated at the time.
It didn't have too many electronic gizmos but it did have a dirty great V8 engine that shifted its bulk at an alarming rate for such a big car. If I could buy any new saloon car ever made it would be one of those.


Call off the dogs - this one does it for me. Just remember this was the S55AMG and Matbach of its time all rolled into one, with the price tag to match; new in 1975, MBUK rushed you a cool £23k for one of these babies......

ErnestM

11,621 posts

268 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
Let me add a couple of Garret T-25's to the X-type's 3.0 litre after I get it back from the shop. Question: Anybody know if the (manual) transmission could handle it? GavinPearson?


ErnestM

Fat Audi 80

2,403 posts

252 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
pentoman said:
It wouldn't exactly be a surprise to see a fast Subaru, BMW or even Jag so I don't think any of these are Q-cars. I like the dolomite sprint thingy, the Lancia and maybe a old old shape Audi S6 plus with the 32v 4.2 V8



Bet noone knew those existed!


Yep,
Buts that's 'cause I have one of these....

[/URL]

280 BHP 300Ft/lb 0-60 5 secs 160mph (4wd)

>> Edited by Fat Audi 80 on Thursday 1st December 14:12

pwig

11,956 posts

271 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
Alpina B10 Bi Turbo.

>> Edited by pwig on Thursday 1st December 14:14

Marki

15,763 posts

271 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
rsvmilly said:
I remember reading an article about an Uno Turbo which had water injection. It had been de-badged to look like an Uno 45. That was a 'Q' car


i had an Uno turbo many many moons ago is all i have to say about that , she was a hoot to drive

jeremyc

23,714 posts

285 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
Just a boring old Audi estate .....




.... that out-accelerates Mclaren F1s and many supercars.

JonRB

74,879 posts

273 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
jeremyc said:
Just a boring old Audi estate .....
With wheels nicked off a Porsche.

Fat Audi 80

2,403 posts

252 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
jeremyc said:
Just a boring old Audi estate .....




.... that out-accelerates Mclaren F1s and many supercars.



Nice

DJC

23,563 posts

237 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
Ribol said:
For me a Q car is one that surprises me when it disappears up the road or when I drive it. Cars like the Lotus Carlton can be spotted from any angle as being more than the rep version. The Vantage version of an Aston is no more a Q car than an Aston is.


The Lotus Carlton is very restrained on bodywork and looks mostly like a Gsi version.

As for you (presumably) thinking Im talking about the Vantage version of the Virage, well, that prooves my point about the Turbo'd Virage exactly!

Ribol

11,382 posts

259 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
DJC said:
Ribol said:
For me a Q car is one that surprises me when it disappears up the road or when I drive it. Cars like the Lotus Carlton can be spotted from any angle as being more than the rep version. The Vantage version of an Aston is no more a Q car than an Aston is.


The Lotus Carlton is very restrained on bodywork and looks mostly like a Gsi version.

Yes, they are very similar to a Gsi - well, apart from the exterior that is.

nisr227

176 posts

237 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
Still like those RS2's, although they only out-accelerate an F1 to 30mph
and with the bodykit and large red Porsche Calipers hardly Q but still an estate

If your talking modified cars, then you can't really get more Q than the Fensport Corrola, really does look standard, but its done a 10.3sec 1/4 mile and has been offically timed at over 200mph.

JonRB

74,879 posts

273 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
Ribol said:
Yes, they are very similar to a Gsi - well, apart from the exterior that is.

yertis

18,111 posts

267 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
pentoman said:
It wouldn't exactly be a surprise to see a fast Subaru, BMW or even Jag so I don't think any of these are Q-cars. I like the dolomite sprint thingy, the Lancia and maybe a old old shape Audi S6 plus with the 32v 4.2 V8



Bet noone knew those existed!


How much do you bet? I've driven one on quite a few occasions

Nose heavy, but go like stink. Thirsty as hell.

mr_yogi

3,280 posts

256 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all


Has to be one of the most er... Q... Q Cars? Turbo Technics Minker 323

NST

1,523 posts

244 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
[redacted]

A57 HSV

1,510 posts

231 months

Thursday 1st December 2005
quotequote all
Best Q-Car I've seen recently was an early model Daewoo Saloon in fairly poor condition.
The owner had spent a lot of money & time transplanting Astra GTE engine, suspension etc. into it & then heavily tuning it. He described it as a "Sleeper" & built it with this sole intention.
Went like stink & must have been a hoot to drive.