RE: No predictability in 2014 F1

RE: No predictability in 2014 F1

Author
Discussion

ewenm

28,506 posts

246 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
So there's a shiny new F1 subforum under the motorsport section and even PH's article writers ignore it hehe

It'll be interesting to see how the new regs shake up the field though.

Root Ginger

37 posts

220 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
LordPetroleum said:
LOL, depress left foot on clutch pedal, engage brain prior to popping mouth/typing fingers in to gear me thinks wink
But F1 cars don't have clutch pedals, just a hand clutch...

smilo996

2,817 posts

171 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
Which team does Newey belong to? Given he has ten championships with three manufacturers and likely with several different engine displacements and engine manufacturers. I would not bet against him.

LordPetroleum

371 posts

171 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
Root Ginger said:
LordPetroleum said:
LOL, depress left foot on clutch pedal, engage brain prior to popping mouth/typing fingers in to gear me thinks wink
But F1 cars don't have clutch pedals, just a hand clutch
Tsk!, and there I was trying to be all ironical wink Anyways, reckon the targeted poster couldn't handle a hand operated clutch due to probably having his wang in his hand.

jon-

16,511 posts

217 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
article said:
You can hear these fascinating new engines in action here from Mercedes and here from Renault. Cue loads of debate whether that breathy sound can ever match a naturally aspirated V8 or V10
I don't even think us argumentative pricks at PH can debate this one. The new units sound st compared to the glordy days of V8s and V10s pushing towards 20,000rpm.

There's no getting away from the 2 silencers (turbos) in the exhaust and the 15,000rpm rev limit.

STiG911

1,210 posts

168 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
phil1979 said:
If they are going the turbo route, couldn't Red Bull's competitors simply get a remap from someone like Angel Tuning, to get an edge? The FIA wouldn't be able to test for it (a dealer can't tell that my car's been remapped), plus it would only be about £150. Also, the tuner can come to the premises, so no need to transport the car to them.
Even if this was possible (unlikely given that all teams have to use a standard ECU onto which they write their own maps) it would be pointless as any performance gain would almost certainly come at the expense of economy, eating into the 100kg 'race fuel' limit.
The biggest gains for next year are in the energy recovery and storage systems which, historically, have been Red Bulls achilles heel owing to the cooling required.
Will be interesting to see if they still occur after Webber departs though.

Le TVR

3,092 posts

252 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
Great.
So we go from tyre conservation to fuel conservation sleep

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

247 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
jon- said:
There's no getting away from the 2 silencers (turbos) in the exhaust and the 15,000rpm rev limit.
^^^ Quite

No increased chance of the words "F1" and "exciting" getting anywhere near each other IMO. Too many rules and gadgets - not enough racing.

GroundEffect

13,855 posts

157 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
Here is one of the best previews as to how they will sound:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcmKJ5MhDh8

Not quite what we have today, but sound good enough.

For reference, that 1988 car has a 1.5 Honda V6 Twin-Turbo limited to 2.5bar, producing 675BHP - 2014 engines will produce around 600BHP from their single turbo units and with single exhaust outlet they will sound a bit higher pitched.







Edited by GroundEffect on Monday 4th November 14:48

STiG911

1,210 posts

168 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
jon- said:
I don't even think us argumentative pricks at PH can debate this one. The new units sound st compared to the glordy days of V8s and V10s pushing towards 20,000rpm.

There's no getting away from the 2 silencers (turbos) in the exhaust and the 15,000rpm rev limit.
As someone who's stood next to a mid-80's F1 Turbo unit just on tickover, I can safely say that the proof will be in the track-side experience. If the new (single turbo btw) units are even half as good as the older ones, they'll still sound awesome. And loud-as-f biggrin

budgie smuggler

5,408 posts

160 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
jon- said:
article said:
You can hear these fascinating new engines in action here from Mercedes and here from Renault. Cue loads of debate whether that breathy sound can ever match a naturally aspirated V8 or V10
I don't even think us argumentative pricks at PH can debate this one. The new units sound st compared to the glordy days of V8s and V10s pushing towards 20,000rpm.

There's no getting away from the 2 silencers (turbos) in the exhaust and the 15,000rpm rev limit.
Engineers have been saying they'll be unlikely to go above 12k due to fuel flow restrictions.

urquattro

755 posts

187 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all

F1, a complete wreck of competitive racing from about 2010 onwards towards super mini status, just like the killing of Rallying and Tin Tops.

This is exactly why historic racing and events pulls in the crowds now - nose, spectacle, style and skill of the drivers, F1 may as well all be on a play station game thing, oh it seems it is already there.

Congratulations to Vettel/Red Bull, boring as you are no one can doubt the combined excellence.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

247 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
STiG911 said:
As someone who's stood next to a mid-80's F1 Turbo unit just on tickover, I can safely say that the proof will be in the track-side experience.
If it's a anything like the muted sound of low-revving Audi diesel turbos at Le mans it ain't going to be much!

Don1

15,963 posts

209 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
If it's a anything like the muted sound of low-revving Audi diesel turbos at Le mans it ain't going to be much!
They sound like racing tea-kettles!

So the crux of the story is that they are predicting non-predictability. Interesting....

GroundEffect

13,855 posts

157 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
STiG911 said:
As someone who's stood next to a mid-80's F1 Turbo unit just on tickover, I can safely say that the proof will be in the track-side experience.
If it's a anything like the muted sound of low-revving Audi diesel turbos at Le mans it ain't going to be much!
Watch the video I posted and have a listen.

dingocooke

670 posts

221 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
And here was me thinking 'F1 cant get any more dull'

It doesn't matter how many gimmicks you throw at F1, it gets less exciting; and every time you introduce something like KERS, it becomes more difficult for a casual spectator to understand; F1 needs new fans, this won't help IMHO.

Simple formulae breeds exciting racing, what it needs is an open specification, for example if you have to fit the whole car within a cubic volume, and a maximum tyre track width and maximum weight limit.
Then no other restrictions; now that would be fun!!!

For me F1 racing died a long time ago


750turbo

6,164 posts

225 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
What we need is...

3500cc

Whatever configuration sounds the best...

Turbos...

idea Superchargers...

4 Wheel drive maybe???

Oh, and sideskirts!

getmecoat

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
More new regs, more expense = less teams.

Still, I heard Ferrari world was absolutely slammed after the GP and that corporate bookings are well up. I wonder why there is no TV audience left...hmmm, no matter, we'll mention turbos, everyone likes turbos right?

Meanwhile everyone has left, fed up with the boring predictability of the racing and the diminishing spectacle. Never thought i'd say it but F1 needs to look at the US for how to run a race series.

Fans first. Everything else follows.

Dog Star

16,167 posts

169 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
1600...? Wow..

What's for 2015, four wheeled recumbent bikes?
Weren't the absolute turbo-nutter bd cars of the 80s 1.5 litres, and bunging out about 1000bhp?

Need to check on this...

365daytonafan

283 posts

186 months

Monday 4th November 2013
quotequote all
750turbo said:
What we need is...

3500cc

Whatever configuration sounds the best...

Turbos...

idea Superchargers...

4 Wheel drive maybe???

Oh, and sideskirts!

getmecoat
Or even six wheels like the Tyrells of the 70s smile