The Official 2017 Spanish Grand Prix Thread **Spoilers**

The Official 2017 Spanish Grand Prix Thread **Spoilers**

Author
Discussion

Doink

1,652 posts

148 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
Or very hot oil?

Krikkit

26,587 posts

182 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
Already confirmed as an oil leak - don't forget it will be easily 100 degrees, and they use some fairly thin viscosity to keep losses down, so plenty splashy.

Such a farce on Honda's front, I'm amazed they haven't just bailed out. That said, there was a good article on Autosport highlighting how ordinary they usually are. The turbo 80s period was the only time they've really been any good.

budgie smuggler

5,407 posts

160 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Such a farce on Honda's front, .
Was this particular fk up Honda's fault ?

housen

2,366 posts

193 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
budgie smuggler said:
Krikkit said:
Such a farce on Honda's front, .
Was this particular fk up Honda's fault ?
you think the oil is leaking from the carbon fibre chassis ?

London424

12,829 posts

176 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
It appears that the smart people at Merc have produced something pretty handy with this update.

patmahe

5,767 posts

205 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
What I don't get is that we've had 3 years of this now and it seems to be getting worse rather than better. If the car was fast when it runs that would be something, or even reliable but a bit off the pace.

Where are the signs this will get fixed, a company with Honda's resources should be better than this. If I was McLaren, at this stage I'd be looking for a way out. Almost anything is better, even going begging to Mercedes for a supply and re-establishing themselves as competent because right now I am starting to fear for their survival if something does not change.

budgie smuggler

5,407 posts

160 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
housen said:
you think the oil is leaking from the carbon fibre chassis ?
Thanks for that. No, I meant it may have been an installation issue i.e. an oil line came loose rather than the engine stting itself and subsequently dropping the oil.


Edited by budgie smuggler on Friday 12th May 11:44

Dr Z

3,396 posts

172 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
Merc testing a more draggy rear wing on Hamilton's car in FP1.


Spoon wing on Bottas' car.



Doink

1,652 posts

148 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
budgie smuggler said:
Thanks for that. No, I meant it may have been an installation issue i.e. a pipe came loose rather than the engine stting itself and subsequently dropping the oil.
Think it may have been more than a pipe coming loose, whatever is was came with no warning and locked to wheels up, brundle suggested maybe a snapped crank or it's thrown a rod, sounds about right, either way probably meant the floor catching most of the oil till it found it's way out back when the car was tilted.

You wouldn't mind so much if it was blisteringly fast but would grenade itself or off the pace but reliable but its neither, 3 years down the road and it still looks like it's their first ever foray into f1

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

153 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
London424 said:
It appears that the smart people at Merc have produced something pretty handy with this update.
It's looking very smart isn't it?

Dr Z

3,396 posts

172 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
Vocal Minority said:
London424 said:
It appears that the smart people at Merc have produced something pretty handy with this update.
It's looking very smart isn't it?
What's the word. Ominous. hehe

I'll see what they do in FP2, nobody has run the Soft tyre yet. Long runs are almost always a better indicator of pace. If the picture is murky this evening, tomorrow evening should be clearer.

Dr Z

3,396 posts

172 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
Apparently, Pirelli have panic bumped up the rear tyre pressures by 2 PSI from the pre-season test, and 0.5 PSI higher on the fronts as the downforce increases from teams have been unexpectedly high...hence the cars sliding around. If they're happy with the loads from FP2 running, they'll reduce the min pressures tomorrow.

(Source: AMuS)

andburg

7,357 posts

170 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
Yet again I'm really impressed with the Renault factory effort.

Long way to go but the signs are very positive, its a shame they are encumbered with Palmer

FourWheelDrift

88,667 posts

285 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
When you get small pieces of carbon fibre on track I always think why they haven't got some kind of high pressure air gun that a marshal could use to blow it off the track without getting on or close to the track themselves. One assigned to each marshals post that goes around to every race.

Might not work at Monaco or other street circuits though as it'll just blow it into the armco on the other side and shatter it even more. smile

PhillipM

6,524 posts

190 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
Because you'd need a small, portable tornado?

Rick101

6,972 posts

151 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
Really didn't need a red flag for that

FourWheelDrift

88,667 posts

285 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
PhillipM said:
Because you'd need a small, portable tornado?
Compressor behind the armco, energy store and a long hose. Not a constant blow but an full force empty the energy store in one go way.

PhillipM

6,524 posts

190 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Compressor behind the armco, energy store and a long hose. Not a constant blow but an full force empty the energy store in one go way.
The cars are passing it at 100+mph 6 feet away complete with massive wings, undertrays, diffusers, etc, all making huge amounts of shifted air, and they aren't moving it....but a little hose from 60ft with a marshal holding it will do it?

I think all you'll do is put a marshall in A&E when he lands.

Edited by PhillipM on Friday 12th May 14:12

Greeny

1,421 posts

260 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
PhillipM said:
Because you'd need a small, portable tornado?
Compressor behind the armco, energy store and a long hose. Not a constant blow but an full force empty the energy store in one go way.
roflroflrofl

Doink

1,652 posts

148 months

Friday 12th May 2017
quotequote all
A vortex cannon springs to mind