Force India on the edge

Force India on the edge

Author
Discussion

Piginapoke

Original Poster:

4,829 posts

187 months

Friday 30th March 2018
quotequote all

Piginapoke

Original Poster:

4,829 posts

187 months

Friday 30th March 2018
quotequote all
Not much interest in entering F1 nowadays- look at the major sponsors who have left, and compare to FE.

If the 4th placed team, apparently well sponsored and with 2 good drivers can't survive, the writing is on the wall for F1. Liberty take note.

Piginapoke

Original Poster:

4,829 posts

187 months

Friday 30th March 2018
quotequote all
The article says that Williams have veto'd FI receiving an early payment. Happy Easter from Claire!

Piginapoke

Original Poster:

4,829 posts

187 months

Friday 30th March 2018
quotequote all
If FI goes bust, the pot is split among 9 teams not 10, so more for Williams.

If I recall, FI veto'd Marussia from using a year old chassis before they folded, so what goes around comes around.


Piginapoke

Original Poster:

4,829 posts

187 months

Saturday 31st March 2018
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
It's almost as if those who had input to the regulations wanted to keep out minor engine manufacturers.

The regs need to change of course, and not only for engines. The talk of cutting costs has been nonsensical. It seems that most reg changes are there to keep costs up and penalise lesser teams. We see HAAS with last year's Ferrari. What chance do other teams, those with little in the way of resources, stand?

Changing regs costs. So why keep changing?

If engine specs were simplified the likely outcome would be cheaper engine, more engine manufacturers, more teams, more racing. If the aero was simplified to, say, a plank at the front and one at the rear we'd probably get cheaper cars, more teams, more racing, and closer racing.

What it would not mean is that teams at the top currently would be struggling. They'd still be winning but there'd be more excitement. Keep the regs standard for five years and the gap would close. All three well-funded teams would be at the top but they'd be close. The mid field would be closer still and those at the back would have to improve or be replaced.
It seems that, outside of manufacturers and billionaire owners, only the Haas business model is viable with the current costs/income distribution. Bad news for FI, Williams, Sauber.

It helps to explain the woeful Williams drivers this year.