Power, Now vs Then vs Reality

Power, Now vs Then vs Reality

Author
Discussion

J4CKO

Original Poster:

41,723 posts

201 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Was just reading the Maserati thread, got me thinking

Someone bemoaned the Maseratis lack of power "Just 375 BHP", a piffling amount apparently from an engine of that specification, barely enough for it to get out of its own way biggrin

It has to be looked at in the context of 12 years ago, things have changed and 375 bhp isnt that powerful these days, I think a lot of people just play Top Trumps and read magazines, ok SUV's come with 500 bhp plus, as do Mercs, BMW's and Audi's, 375 bhp is sort of sub AMG/M Power levels of power for high end diesels and petrols but these generally now have 4wd and or ESP and weigh two tonnes plus. It kind of reminds me of how modern Fighter planes are unflyable by a pilot without the electronics being in the middle to stabilise the aircraft and interpret the pilots inputs, rather than a mechanical connection.


Cars these days are set up for driveability, economy and safety. Modern cars are faster, no doubt but to some extent they are like a de-clawed, tamed and sanitised version of what went before, Wags drive Cayenne Turbo's with 500 bhp with no issue day in day out, anyone can get in pretty much any high end car and if they dont piss about with the ESP controls it wont spit them off the road but put them in the Maserati, a Cerbera or a Lotus Carlton and lets see how far they get if they take liberties with the throttle when its damp and cold, lets hear their opinion on whether it is not much power after 40 fast miles, obviously after they have spoken to their mummies first biggrin I am no driving god and am having to re-learn rwd and am not ashamed to say 208 bhp is plenty for me at the moment.

I think we get a bit blase about power now, suspect people who do go from a modern, powerful car to an older one are in for some potential shocks, I am driving a 944 S2 after a Saab with another 40 bhp, have to say the Saab was easy to drive and you could take (relative) liberties being FWD and having all the electronics but am quite wary of this even though they dont have that bad a reputation (a good Reputation doesnt always keep you out of hedges), also in the PH scheme of things its slow but I think it is quick enough, I got to 80 odd mph down a country road plenty quick enough which was too quick so it makes me wonder where and how fast some of those who say 200/300 bhp isnt much are driving and how fast they are going !

I have decided I dont care how much power someone else has or how fast they can go as long as I am enjoying my driving, if not, thats when I will get another car.








Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
As I just posted on another thread: I'd rather drive a 200bhp car 90% than a 400bhp car at 50%.

Reardy Mister

13,757 posts

223 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Was just reading the Maserati thread, got me thinking

Someone bemoaned the Maseratis lack of power "Just 375 BHP", a piffling amount apparently from an engine of that specification, barely enough for it to get out of its own way biggrin

It has to be looked at in the context of 12 years ago, things have changed and 375 bhp isnt that powerful these days, I think a lot of people just play Top Trumps and read magazines, ok SUV's come with 500 bhp plus, as do Mercs, BMW's and Audi's, 375 bhp is sort of sub AMG/M Power levels of power for high end diesels and petrols but these generally now have 4wd and or ESP and weigh two tonnes plus. It kind of reminds me of how modern Fighter planes are unflyable by a pilot without the electronics being in the middle to stabilise the aircraft and interpret the pilots inputs, rather than a mechanical connection.


Cars these days are set up for driveability, economy and safety. Modern cars are faster, no doubt but to some extent they are like a de-clawed, tamed and sanitised version of what went before, Wags drive Cayenne Turbo's with 500 bhp with no issue day in day out, anyone can get in pretty much any high end car and if they dont piss about with the ESP controls it wont spit them off the road but put them in the Maserati, a Cerbera or a Lotus Carlton and lets see how far they get if they take liberties with the throttle when its damp and cold, lets hear their opinion on whether it is not much power after 40 fast miles, obviously after they have spoken to their mummies first biggrin I am no driving god and am having to re-learn rwd and am not ashamed to say 208 bhp is plenty for me at the moment.

I think we get a bit blase about power now, suspect people who do go from a modern, powerful car to an older one are in for some potential shocks, I am driving a 944 S2 after a Saab with another 40 bhp, have to say the Saab was easy to drive and you could take (relative) liberties being FWD and having all the electronics but am quite wary of this even though they dont have that bad a reputation (a good Reputation doesnt always keep you out of hedges), also in the PH scheme of things its slow but I think it is quick enough, I got to 80 odd mph down a country road plenty quick enough which was too quick so it makes me wonder where and how fast some of those who say 200/300 bhp isnt much are driving and how fast they are going !

I have decided I dont care how much power someone else has or how fast they can go as long as I am enjoying my driving, if not, thats when I will get another car.
Good post. I agree.

Im quite looking forward to just having 200-300hp again, after a year of pain in an old Jeep.

Reardy Mister

13,757 posts

223 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
As I just posted on another thread: I'd rather drive a 200bhp car 90% than a 400bhp car at 50%.
yes


But ask the man if he'd rather have a 600cc or a 1000? hehe


matthias73

2,883 posts

151 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
115bhp car

Means I can drive 100% and still be rather safe whilst doing so.

Whoosh

otolith

56,455 posts

205 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
I see people on this and other forums describing 200bhp in 1200kg 25k entry level sporting coupe as "underpowered", and think people have just completely lost touch with reality.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Reardy Mister said:
yes

But ask the man if he'd rather have a 600cc or a 1000? hehe
Heh, it remains true. The Fireblade made me lazy and less committed. I rode the 600/750 considerably harder than the 1000 and in terms of enjoyment, I'd have to say the 750 was the most involving. The Fireblade handled like Jesus, though.

rottie102

3,999 posts

185 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
As I just posted on another thread: I'd rather drive a 200bhp car 90% than a 400bhp car at 50%.
Just because it sounds cool on PH? rolleyes
I don't understand why would anyone want to limit the horsepower. The throttle doesn't work 0/1. If the car is driveable (as in doesn't require triple plate clutch, drag gearbox etc) I'm more than happy to drive a 1000hp car at 20%, just so I can use ALL THE POWER three times a year.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
Just because it sounds cool on PH? rolleyes
Erm, no, because that's my opinion but hey, if you think it sounds cool, thanks smile

Biker's Nemesis

38,788 posts

209 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
As I just posted on another thread: I'd rather drive a 200bhp car 90% than a 400bhp car at 50%.
How does that work with a 170bhp Fireblade then, what % do you ride that compared to a 600?

kambites

67,657 posts

222 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
I don't understand why would anyone want to limit the horsepower.
Because (at least for me) the fun in driving a car comes from pushing a car as close to its limits as I safety can, and all other things being equal a slower car can generally get closer to its limits for longer than a faster one. Raising any of the limits of a car past a certain point, be it straight line speed, traction or cornering grip, generally makes it less fun to drive, for me.

Things are different on a track - in a track car I'd always take more power unless it compromises responsiveness.

Personally, I'm slightly baffled as to why people want powerful cars on the road. It just seems a complete waste of time to me. Maybe it's just because it sounds cool on PH? wink

Edited by kambites on Thursday 9th February 12:20

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
How does that work with a 170bhp Fireblade then, what % do you ride that compared to a 600?
I think it averaged out at 94.63%, mostly through corners. I've got a Repsol seat next year.

J4CKO

Original Poster:

41,723 posts

201 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
I think over the last 10/15 years, power outputs have been spiralling and more has always equalled better as there had been a shortage of bhp for most people, these days its easy to put yourself in a 400/500 bhp car for not a lot of money, especially if you can fuel and insure it, I think more people will catch on that actually to enjoy driving it isnt always more = better and that it isnt all about straight line acceleration, it is a nice feeling but only part of the equation, if it were the be all and end all the Audi RS6 with a remap to 700 bhp would be the best selling car and nobody would mention the old F40 because the Veyron is faster.

Reardy Mister

13,757 posts

223 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
Rawwr said:
As I just posted on another thread: I'd rather drive a 200bhp car 90% than a 400bhp car at 50%.
Just because it sounds cool on PH? rolleyes
I don't understand why would anyone want to limit the horsepower. The throttle doesn't work 0/1. If the car is driveable (as in doesn't require triple plate clutch, drag gearbox etc) I'm more than happy to drive a 1000hp car at 20%, just so I can use ALL THE POWER three times a year.
Because there's little to compare with the feeling of wringing the neck of something. Which would you rather have, an hour thrashing around on top of Martine McCutcheon, or a flash of Angelina Jolie's tits?


Biker's Nemesis

38,788 posts

209 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
I think it averaged out at 94.63%, mostly through corners. I've got a Repsol seat next year.
Me thinks you're telling fibs!

wolves_wanderer

12,398 posts

238 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
Rawwr said:
As I just posted on another thread: I'd rather drive a 200bhp car 90% than a 400bhp car at 50%.
Just because it sounds cool on PH? rolleyes
I don't understand why would anyone want to limit the horsepower. The throttle doesn't work 0/1. If the car is driveable (as in doesn't require triple plate clutch, drag gearbox etc) I'm more than happy to drive a 1000hp car at 20%, just so I can use ALL THE POWER three times a year.
I have more fun in mine in the wet and/or cold when you can really feel the car moving about, adjusting the line with the throttle. I wouldn't do the same thing anywhere near as much in a car more powerful in the dry.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
Me thinks you're telling fibs!
All true. In all seriousness, all the bikes were a waste in terms of usable power but I'm going to cop out here and say that I bought bikes for different reasons to cars smile

bennyboysvuk

3,491 posts

249 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
Personally, I'm slightly baffled as to why people want powerful cars on the road. It just seems a complete waste of time to me. Maybe it's just because it sounds cool on PH? wink
You need the power to overtake the folk who plod along slowly in the NSLs. The more power you have, the quicker you can dispatch them. driving

kambites

67,657 posts

222 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
bennyboysvuk said:
kambites said:
Personally, I'm slightly baffled as to why people want powerful cars on the road. It just seems a complete waste of time to me. Maybe it's just because it sounds cool on PH? wink
You need the power to overtake the folk who plod along slowly in the NSLs. The more power you have, the quicker you can dispatch them. driving
I rarely have problems overtaking with my measly 200bhp/tonne.

Alex

9,975 posts

285 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
I rarely have problems overtaking with my measly 200bhp/tonne.
200bhp/tonne is the sweet spot IMO.