A question for the VAG guys
Discussion
How old are we talking about? The PD-engines are supposed to be more reliable than the later ones, and the really old mechanical injection engines are better still.
None will leave you at the side of the road more than once though, injectors/pumps/flywheels seem to be good for just over 100,000 miles. How long do you intend to keep the car?
None will leave you at the side of the road more than once though, injectors/pumps/flywheels seem to be good for just over 100,000 miles. How long do you intend to keep the car?
028butlerboy said:
Defcon5 said:
I would imagine they are very similar engines anyway.
well yes, but usually internals are worlds apart reliability wise, take the 130 and the 150bhp diesels of yesteryear, the 130 was bombproof to a degree but the 150 had camshaft issues and so forth.Keep on hearing how good this engine is. Thing is, the 105bhp one in my 09 plate/63k octavia seized on me today on a dual carriageway and looks like a complete write off.... nearly a very nasty accident but fortunately reacted quickly to knock it out of gear and coast to a slip road and missed being flattened by the truck I'd just overtaken by an inch!
Maybe it's something going around, friends have lost a 330CI and an Elise's engines in the last few weeks (even though as a K the latter was well overdue at 105k) and the RAC guy had had 3 detonate on clients today...
Maybe it's something going around, friends have lost a 330CI and an Elise's engines in the last few weeks (even though as a K the latter was well overdue at 105k) and the RAC guy had had 3 detonate on clients today...
mclwanB said:
Keep on hearing how good this engine is. Thing is, the 105bhp one in my 09 plate/63k octavia seized on me today on a dual carriageway and looks like a complete write off.... nearly a very nasty accident but fortunately reacted quickly to knock it out of gear and coast to a slip road and missed being flattened by the truck I'd just overtaken by an inch!
Maybe it's something going around, friends have lost a 330CI and an Elise's engines in the last few weeks (even though as a K the latter was well overdue at 105k) and the RAC guy had had 3 detonate on clients today...
Very unusual. Did it have a FSH with Skoda? Maybe it's something going around, friends have lost a 330CI and an Elise's engines in the last few weeks (even though as a K the latter was well overdue at 105k) and the RAC guy had had 3 detonate on clients today...
How rude!! Pretty fastidiously check the oil although difficult in Devon to find somewhere flat enough!! Bizarrely oil still in the normal range on the dipstick both just after the failure and on return to the garage. Cambelt intact. FSH but not with a Skoda Garage. Gone to Skoda exeter for diagnostics, still in warranty for age and only 2,800 miles out for mileage so hoping they want to keep their reputation in good order... Some people have suggested oil pump failure, anybody have any ideas? No warning of any sort until the bang and loss of power, just the battery light on afterwards..
mclwanB said:
How rude!! Pretty fastidiously check the oil although difficult in Devon to find somewhere flat enough!! Bizarrely oil still in the normal range on the dipstick both just after the failure and on return to the garage. Cambelt intact. FSH but not with a Skoda Garage. Gone to Skoda exeter for diagnostics, still in warranty for age and only 2,800 miles out for mileage so hoping they want to keep their reputation in good order... Some people have suggested oil pump failure, anybody have any ideas? No warning of any sort until the bang and loss of power, just the battery light on afterwards..
Are you sure the engine has had it? Could it be the turbo (perhaps just a hose / pipe has come adrift leaving you with no boost)?Is yours a 2.0 or 1.9? There is a murmur about around a recall on some 2.0 Tdi's that were fitted with a chain driven oil pump that is floored in it's design and has been known to fail - not sure of engines or years but I'm sure a VAG expert on PH will be able to enlighten you - From my experience and I serviced many in my time, the 1.9's are generally more reliable than the 2.0 - although the latest 2.0 tdi CR's are reputed to be very good - as far as diesel engines go (and lets be honest, most modern diesels are just ticking timebombs based on the pressures they run at now), the large majority of them are pretty robust.
Hoping very much the engine hasn't had it. Definitely the 1.9 by the registration documents as well as performance/ NVH- have driven the 2l too. Don't think its turbo- had one go previously and didn't cause engine to cut out or fail to turn over on starter motor (not even a whirr...). Work car but would be better if it doesn't cost them loads as they will be rather unhappy! Came from a Honda crv that did 122k local backroad miles with only transmission problems, focus before that was a lemon!
Report in: con rod through head of block. Fault of manufacture in block causing piston to catch/ seize and force con rod wherever suggested by knowledge friend (ex diesel engineer). Skoda customer relations doesn't work Fridays but apparently garage said as not full skoda service history unlikely to offer any sort of goodwill gesture.
Surely a properly maintained engine is "not reasonably fit for its purpose" if it fails at 2.5 years/ 63k?
Surely a properly maintained engine is "not reasonably fit for its purpose" if it fails at 2.5 years/ 63k?
mclwanB said:
Report in: con rod through head of block. Fault of manufacture in block causing piston to catch/ seize and force con rod wherever suggested by knowledge friend (ex diesel engineer). Skoda customer relations doesn't work Fridays but apparently garage said as not full skoda service history unlikely to offer any sort of goodwill gesture.
Surely a properly maintained engine is "not reasonably fit for its purpose" if it fails at 2.5 years/ 63k?
If the vehicle is still in its three year warranty and you have proof that it has been serviced on time with OE quality parts, they should treat your claim as seriously as another as far as I understand.Surely a properly maintained engine is "not reasonably fit for its purpose" if it fails at 2.5 years/ 63k?
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff