RE: Aston Martin 'not lazy' - official

RE: Aston Martin 'not lazy' - official

Author
Discussion

big_rob_sydney

3,413 posts

195 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
AM? Their cars have looked the same for the last thousand years.

Besides which, the performance is nowhere near what its price level would seem to suggest. Plenty of far faster metal around for much less money.

Whats the point.

Lose some weight, add some power, drop the price. Does the gearbox actually work properly now (referring to the Top Gear episode where its shifting was laughable)?

The Pits

4,289 posts

241 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
The blind loyalty towards porsche's is staggering.

Aston GT3 racer with the V12 engine (100kgs heavier than the V8) comes in at 1250kgs

Porsche GT3 Cup racer 1160kgs.

V8 Vantage GT2 1150kgs.

The Aston racers use VH chassis.

The VH chassis is probably the last thing that anyone should be criticising Aston Martin for.

Digga

40,443 posts

284 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
The Pits said:
The blind loyalty towards porsche's is staggering.
I;ve no loyalty to anyone, just look at [i[raod[/i] car weights though;

V12V = 1680kgs.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
NGK210 said:
"Being so modular means Aston rolls out all-new systems easily, as they become available rather than at model change time - ... developed with engineering partners such as ZF..."

What a load of old bcensoredit! ZF has almost forgotten Aston exists, never mind being "partners" - it's probably the only car company still using the old 6-speed autobox, whereas all others swapped to the 8-speeder yonks ago, including grade-A penny-picher Jag.
hehe I've always wondered if anyone else has noticed that about Jaguar. Goes back all the way to William Lyons by all accounts.

michael gould

5,691 posts

242 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
I have read this thread with some amusement.......my thoughts

I am on my third Aston Martin, my present car being a DB9...my comments

It has stupidly excessive fuel consumption.....I’m getting around 14MPG
It is very expensive to service and if it has a fault kiss good bye to the family holiday
It’s not that reliable.
It is no were near the best drivers car I have owned
The rear seats are a joke and my 3 YO just about fits in the back
The satnav is truly awful and cost £1500 extra
The ICE is bloody awful
The dash board looks like something out of a 15k car
The depreciation is huge
They cost a staggering 134k new


but but but......when you open the garage doors in the morning and behold its total perfection and balance you forgive all its idiosyncrasies......to own a modern day Aston Martin is truly a privilege experienced by few. Aston Martin have produced in its total history about as many cars as Ford produce in 1 day (ok maybe 1 1/2 days) that truly is an exclusive club that I love being a member of

Dblue

3,260 posts

201 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
The Pits said:
The blind loyalty towards porsche's is staggering.

Aston GT3 racer with the V12 engine (100kgs heavier than the V8) comes in at 1250kgs

Porsche GT3 Cup racer 1160kgs.

V8 Vantage GT2 1150kgs.

The Aston racers use VH chassis.

The VH chassis is probably the last thing that anyone should be criticising Aston Martin for.
I would suggest that blind loyalty towards Porsche is matched in your case by corresponding antipathy.It's a broad church on PH and that's a great thing but surely it's possible to appreciate the products of any firm if they are good. This isn't tribal you know, you are allowed to like Lotus, Aston and Porsche , it's not exclusive.

The GT3 racers are completely irrelevant in this comparison, night and day different to road going equivalents.


:J:

2,593 posts

226 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
AM? Their cars have looked the same for the last thousand years.

Besides which, the performance is nowhere near what its price level would seem to suggest. Plenty of far faster metal around for much less money.

Whats the point.

Lose some weight, add some power, drop the price. Does the gearbox actually work properly now (referring to the Top Gear episode where its shifting was laughable)?
Aston is not about outright speed, you clearly don't understand their customer base. Performance isn't everything to everyone funnily enough.... If all people wanted was performance from their purchase, we would all be in chavved up Jap crap?

But then again, you have quoted Top Gear, so it is understandable you don't know much wink You also have no clue of what cars Aston have released if you think they all look the same from the day they started.

The gearbox worked fine when JC had it, he just wasn't using it properly, you are meant to give your foot a slight lift when shifting and it changes as smoothly as you would want, Clarkson just chose to ignore this as it gave him something to bh about. Funnily enough, within a few episodes, his ham fistedness broke the gearbox on a Jag at the ring (IIRC?). Would he have been happier if he was given the freedom by Aston to blow the Vanquish gearbox??

Edited by :J: on Wednesday 17th October 12:51

897sma

3,387 posts

145 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
michael gould said:
I have read this thread with some amusement.......my thoughts

I am on my third Aston Martin, my present car being a DB9...my comments

It has stupidly excessive fuel consumption.....I’m getting around 14MPG
It is very expensive to service and if it has a fault kiss good bye to the family holiday
It’s not that reliable.
It is no were near the best drivers car I have owned
The rear seats are a joke and my 3 YO just about fits in the back
The satnav is truly awful and cost £1500 extra
The ICE is bloody awful
The dash board looks like something out of a 15k car
The depreciation is huge
They cost a staggering 134k new


but but but......when you open the garage doors in the morning and behold its total perfection and balance you forgive all its idiosyncrasies......to own a modern day Aston Martin is truly a privilege experienced by few. Aston Martin have produced in its total history about as many cars as Ford produce in 1 day (ok maybe 1 1/2 days) that truly is an exclusive club that I love being a member of
Well said Mr gould

Digga

40,443 posts

284 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
michael gould said:
I am on my third Aston Martin, my present car being a DB9...but but but......when you open the garage doors in the morning and behold its total perfection and balance you forgive all its idiosyncrasies......
Have to say, for a luxury GT, the DB9 is perfectly judged. In a way, this is more that Aston has been 'about' in the last few decades and only recently, back in racing and with the V8V are they trying to muscle into the Porsche (etc.) market.

There used to be a guy in my village with a huge collection of Astons and the DB9S sounded utterly sublime and looked the part too. In many ways, given the state and congestion of contemporary roads the DB9 is perhaps most relevant.

Richard-G

1,677 posts

176 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
michael gould said:
I have read this thread with some amusement.......my thoughts

I am on my third Aston Martin, my present car being a DB9...my comments

It has stupidly excessive fuel consumption.....I’m getting around 14MPG
It is very expensive to service and if it has a fault kiss good bye to the family holiday
It’s not that reliable.
It is no were near the best drivers car I have owned
The rear seats are a joke and my 3 YO just about fits in the back
The satnav is truly awful and cost £1500 extra
The ICE is bloody awful
The dash board looks like something out of a 15k car
The depreciation is huge
They cost a staggering 134k new


but but but......when you open the garage doors in the morning and behold its total perfection and balance you forgive all its idiosyncrasies......to own a modern day Aston Martin is truly a privilege experienced by few. Aston Martin have produced in its total history about as many cars as Ford produce in 1 day (ok maybe 1 1/2 days) that truly is an exclusive club that I love being a member of
The DB9 in your profile picture is so pretty it makes me, i don't know, feel a bit odd. I'd actually enjoy the poor fuel consumption as it gives you a chance to get out, look at it, fill it with fuel, walk to the kiosk (looking at it) queue up (still looking at it) then walk back STILL looking at it.

RichB

51,787 posts

285 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
Whats the point.
Says the man with a Subaru and a Lexus in his garage scratchchin ...

George H

14,707 posts

165 months

Wednesday 17th October 2012
quotequote all
Pr1964 said:
The Jag's there to show how Aston Martins look cheap because they look a lot more like Jags than Astons.
What the hell are you on about? Park a Jag and an Aston next to each other and the Jag looks cheap. They're considerably cheaper for a reason rolleyes

Talksteer

4,931 posts

234 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
The Pits said:
The blind loyalty towards porsche's is staggering.

Aston GT3 racer with the V12 engine (100kgs heavier than the V8) comes in at 1250kgs

Porsche GT3 Cup racer 1160kgs.

V8 Vantage GT2 1150kgs.

The Aston racers use VH chassis.

The VH chassis is probably the last thing that anyone should be criticising Aston Martin for.
GT3 cars are equalised using weight, engine restrictors, ride heigh and tyre options.

Hence if you spend a vast amount of money reducing weight the organisers will add ballast to your car to make it fair. Reducing weight is quite sensible for larger cars particularly with regards to brake wear and fuel efficiency.

Disastrous

10,094 posts

218 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
That's funny, I can't believe anyone would be so fking stupid that they can't see that it's definitely one of the best, and lightest of the cars that people would actually consider buying instead. That's more relevant, why don't you compare it to a Koenigsegg and say how slow it is. Or perhaps a Range Rover and say how crap it is off road. Your points are irrelevant, I don't understand why you can't see that confused

I really get the impression you've never actually driven a V8V, or even any Aston. You sound like you've got your facts from Top Gear rolleyes

And as I said before... If you think it's too heavy, don't go and part ex your massively out of date Boxster for one smile
Much as I enjoyed the righteous indignation if your post, You really come across as a pretty angry man. I suspect Aston Martin wouldn't thank for your sterling work as a brand ambassador...Are you one of those people that's incredibly defensive about their taste/choices?

FWIW, I can't afford one but wouldn't buy one if I could as they're not my cup of tea, looks wise. Is that allowed?

George H

14,707 posts

165 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
FWIW, I can't afford one but wouldn't buy one if I could as they're not my cup of tea, looks wise. Is that allowed?
I really don't care. If you don't like it then don't buy it. It's hardly complicated is it?

Disastrous

10,094 posts

218 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
Disastrous said:
FWIW, I can't afford one but wouldn't buy one if I could as they're not my cup of tea, looks wise. Is that allowed?
I really don't care. If you don't like it then don't buy it. It's hardly complicated is it?
Why the venom for those that compare it unfavourably to something else then? And why paragraphs of spittle-flecked defence?

Dblue

3,260 posts

201 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
Disastrous said:
FWIW, I can't afford one but wouldn't buy one if I could as they're not my cup of tea, looks wise. Is that allowed?
I really don't care. If you don't like it then don't buy it. It's hardly complicated is it?
He's not making a point about the merits of the car, just making an observation about your aggressive, defensive rants with regard to it.
And he's spot on




George H

14,707 posts

165 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
Disastrous said:
Why the venom for those that compare it unfavourably to something else then? And why paragraphs of spittle-flecked defence?
because after several attempts at trying to explain how comparing it to an £80k car to a £200k car is irrelevant, some imbeciles still can't see that rolleyes as I've said before, compare a V8V to its actual rivals and the results aren't half as bad as some people on here make out...

If you really think Im angry over it then you're wrong. I just find it hard to deal with people who criticise cars that they clearly have no clue about.

Disastrous

10,094 posts

218 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
Disastrous said:
Why the venom for those that compare it unfavourably to something else then? And why paragraphs of spittle-flecked defence?
because after several attempts at trying to explain how comparing it to an £80k car to a £200k car is irrelevant, some imbeciles still can't see that rolleyes as I've said before, compare a V8V to its actual rivals and the results aren't half as bad as some people on here make out...

If you really think Im angry over it then you're wrong. I just find it hard to deal with people who criticise cars that they clearly have no clue about.
Fair enough. I don't really care either but was just curious as to why so angry, but you're not, so it doesn't matter.

Changing tack slightly, I've been fortunate enough to drive some really nice cars on track and (though I appreciate this is a tremendously un-PH) thing to say, they're ALL pretty good.

If I was buying for myself as a road car, I'd buy the one I liked the look of most inside and out. I think it's hard to buy a st car for £80k these so it really just comes down to which characteristics, looks or brand you prefer. Is that a fair point?

The Pits

4,289 posts

241 months

Thursday 18th October 2012
quotequote all
Alas George we are in general gassing should we really expect any better?

What bugs me is that the 991 is actually more expensive than the V8V now if you compare similarly specc'd cars. Yet Aston will give you an aluminium chassis, gorgeous curves and exquisite detailing, massive sense of occasion (dare I even mention British design and build?) porsche are still pedalling steel eggy shaped things with lots of plastic inside. If you would rather have a steel chassis as some claim here, then good luck to you.

People can't see through all porsche's smoke and mirrors. Remember that this is the company who put a porsche badge on a VW Toureg and charged £100k for it.