RE: TVR's rebirth - can it work? PH Blog

RE: TVR's rebirth - can it work? PH Blog

Author
Discussion

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

248 months

Tuesday 10th May 2016
quotequote all
The history books are full of "desirable, enthusiast, specialist, light-weight, drivers cars" which failed because they didn't achieve the "average" which is essential to get out of the starting blocks.

Compare the Perana Z-One which morphed into the AC 378 GT Zagato which morphed into absolutely no sales whatsoever. 2012, "AC is still finalising details such as interior trim specifications and UK suspension settings, but reckons the 378 GT Zagato should be available to order this year at about £90,000. It could be good."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/classiccars/92...




ChilliWhizz

11,994 posts

163 months

Tuesday 10th May 2016
quotequote all
I have a slightly modified 18 year old Chimaera which does 0-60 and 0-100 quicker than the C7 Vette... The modded lump under the bonnet is based on a 4.6 Coscast Rover block. I like Vette's and once had the pleasure of being driven from Houston (Texas) to Lafeyette (Louisiana), via the bayou's in a banana yellow C4.... Was a bit ' drive faster I can hear banjos'... But fun...
I also like cheese smilek


And if anyone is interested my favourite cheese is dolce latte.... Washed down with a Barollo... Which has as much to do with TVR as a bloody Corvette...

smile

ETA: Sorry, spelt Barolo incorrectly.... I'm also on drugs (prescribed) for a shot back so may not be making much sense smile


Edited by ChilliWhizz on Wednesday 11th May 08:51

Hughesie

12,573 posts

284 months

Tuesday 10th May 2016
quotequote all
I'm still in the believe camp - unfortunately i missed the show as a deposit holder as the Mrs changed our holiday plans so i'm looking forward to the events in the summer to have a proper catch up.

The final video shot made me think of the old Speed 12 front corners with a bastardised Tuscan front - but that might just be me smile

Impasse

15,099 posts

243 months

Tuesday 10th May 2016
quotequote all
ChilliWhizz said:
And if anyone is interested my favourite cheese is dolce latte.... Washed down with a Barollo... Which has as much to do with TVR as a bloody Corvette...
I dunno. They are both a bit crumbly around the edges and both smell funny.

unsprung

5,467 posts

126 months

Wednesday 11th May 2016
quotequote all
ChilliWhizz said:
And if anyone is interested my favourite cheese is dolce latte.... Washed down with a Barollo...
hehe

RoverP6B

4,338 posts

130 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
I've been saying this for yonks. No way could they develop and introduce it in the timescales involved, not even with a bog standard Ford motor (which, despite assurances to the contrary, it turns out is exactly what's under the bonnet). Where is their unique selling point? Why, for God's sake, would you buy this over a V8 Vantage, which is also quick, naturally-aspirated and manual?

Personally, I wish they'd just bring back the Sagaris.

rb26

786 posts

188 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
I've been saying this for yonks. No way could they develop and introduce it in the timescales involved, not even with a bog standard Ford motor (which, despite assurances to the contrary, it turns out is exactly what's under the bonnet). Where is their unique selling point? Why, for God's sake, would you buy this over a V8 Vantage, which is also quick, naturally-aspirated and manual?

Personally, I wish they'd just bring back the Sagaris.
USPs:

1100-1300kg
400hp/tonne
V8 (In a world of downsizing it's now a USP)
6-speed manual
£60-80k (depending on spec)
Will be more reliable than an Aston Martin (tongue out)
Next to no electronic nanny aids.

It's a niche car, no question about it, but I think there is definitely a market for it. With the increasingly sanitised and usable nature of sports cars today, some customers out there may want to get into something that makes them feel a little bit scared perhaps? The only real competitors at the £60-80k range are the; F-Type R, 991.2 Carrera (can option a C2 into 6 figures for Christ sake), Lotus Evora 400, Alfa 4c, Aston Martin V8 vantage and the Nissan GTR. Whilst you could get a variety of second hand options from Ferrari and Lamborghini, they aren't new cars and, I would assume, cost far more in up-keep.

From the list of new cars, its likely the TVR would blow all of them (besides the GTR perhaps) into the weeds. I for one can't wait to see what TVR come up with and remain optimistic. Lets support our national manufacturers, with a healthy dose of realism, instead of discounting them before they've even shown anything tangible.... beer

JockySteer

1,407 posts

118 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
Having had a chat with a TVR specialist recently whilst having some work done, they seem to think it'll have a NA (maybe supercharged) V8 with near 500bhp.

That with a c.1100-1200kg weight & manual gearbox please.

Griffithy

929 posts

278 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
RoverP6B said:
Why, for God's sake, would you buy this over a V8 Vantage, which is also quick, naturally-aspirated and manual?
Because some of us are still to young (at heart) for that kind of nanny equipped sports lorry.
smokin

jamieduff1981

8,030 posts

142 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
Griffithy said:
RoverP6B said:
Why, for God's sake, would you buy this over a V8 Vantage, which is also quick, naturally-aspirated and manual?
Because some of us are still to young (at heart) for that kind of nanny equipped sports lorry.
smokin
When people say stuff like that ^, it only makes it obvious that they have no idea what they're really comparing. Vantages are absolutely nothing like late model TVRs. Absolutely everything that makes a TVR a TVR is absent from the Vantage and that's a good thing for both the people who buy TVRs and the people who buy Vantages. They are different customers.

To dreamers in diesels and family cars fantasising over sports cars, they're all much of a muchness, but the actual product is night and day when you compare them as sports cars.

The term "GT" gets bandied about as some sort of pseudo-insult sometimes, but the fact is that TVR owners want the loud, harsh, direct and very connected sensory overload that a TVR embodies. The Vantage owner wants to wang along at great pace in a soothing environment. Both are comfortable to be in etc - it's not as though a TVR should be equated to a Caterham or a Lotus by people without direct sports car experience - TVRs are very comfortable to sit in, but the driver expects the car to be demanding to drive and feels like a spare part in cars like the F-Type, Porsche and Vantage, whereas a Vantage customer would find a TVR a pain in the arse.

The aging gentlemen of Top Gear who always went on about how the AMG GT had "grown up" when compared to the SLS are Vantage type customers. They want a car for London that can go fast outside. TVR customers don't want the car to grow up.

I realise that's hard to explain to people who have only ever driven different shades of modest performance family cars, but there it is.

900T-R

20,404 posts

259 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
^^^^^ This, to a word. thumbup

ChilliWhizz

11,994 posts

163 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
Nicely put James thumbup

JockySteer

1,407 posts

118 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
jamieduff1981 said:
Post dripping with common sense
beer

AOK

2,297 posts

168 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
jamieduff1981 said:
talking sense
Give this man a medal thumbup

Byker28i

61,374 posts

219 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
JockySteer said:
Having had a chat with a TVR specialist recently whilst having some work done, they seem to think it'll have a NA (maybe supercharged) V8 with near 500bhp.

That with a c.1100-1200kg weight & manual gearbox please.
LOL - I'd expect 410-420bhp on the standard/basic car, 500bhp plus on the Cosworth engined car (LE) if not more. Supercharger as a later option or aftermarket (there's already cheap bolt on kits in the US that add 200bhp).

JockySteer

1,407 posts

118 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
Byker28i said:
JockySteer said:
Having had a chat with a TVR specialist recently whilst having some work done, they seem to think it'll have a NA (maybe supercharged) V8 with near 500bhp.

That with a c.1100-1200kg weight & manual gearbox please.
LOL - I'd expect 410-420bhp on the standard/basic car, 500bhp plus on the Cosworth engined car (LE) if not more. Supercharger as a later option or aftermarket (there's already cheap bolt on kits in the US that add 200bhp).
Let's sit tight and wait then thumbup

AOK

2,297 posts

168 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
A new render from AutoCar


anonymous-user

56 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
AOK said:
A new render from AutoCar

Ah the good old front cover "render/artists impression" complete with the ubiquitous tiny glass house to make the car look "Racey"....

(look at it, the side windows aren't even half as high as the wheel, no way could you either get into that, or see out of it (and hence it won't pass sightline homologation requirements etc)

The Vambo

6,730 posts

143 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Ah the good old front cover "render/artists impression" complete with the ubiquitous tiny glass house to make the car look "Racey"....

(look at it, the side windows aren't even half as high as the wheel, no way could you either get into that, or see out of it (and hence it won't pass sightline homologation requirements etc)
Wait a minute...... are you trying to tell me that Autocar is just making some stuff up????

KTF

9,843 posts

152 months

Friday 13th May 2016
quotequote all
The Vambo said:
Wait a minute...... are you trying to tell me that Autocar is just making some stuff up????
Only when they have finished getting far too excited over any BMW or anything British.