RE: One-off Rolls-Royce 'Sweptail' announced

RE: One-off Rolls-Royce 'Sweptail' announced

Author
Discussion

Evilex

512 posts

105 months

Monday 29th May 2017
quotequote all
bonecrusher said:
more boat than car
Boaty McBoatArse

Pothole

34,367 posts

283 months

Monday 29th May 2017
quotequote all
rare6499 said:
Some of the comments in this thread are madness.


If people are true car fans you have to admire this car, even if you don't find it aesthetically to your tastes. But just the sheer uniqueness and extravagance of it is awesome.
Yup, you've proved your assertion right there.

Pothole

34,367 posts

283 months

Monday 29th May 2017
quotequote all
I think this lot need to "build" some shoes for the owner...https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=72&t=1669491

herebebeasties

674 posts

220 months

Monday 29th May 2017
quotequote all
I don't know why people have this idea that Rolls Royces have to be tasteful things of beauty. They have nearly always been both that and outrageously over the top tacky chromefests - even in the twenties people were marrying them with crazy amounts of chrome grille and in-your-face oppulence:



I think there's plenty of room for both. (I do think the latest Black Series Wraiths are of very questionable taste, mind you - this makes those look like chavved-up Novas in comparison.)

Pothole

34,367 posts

283 months

Monday 29th May 2017
quotequote all
herebebeasties said:
I don't know why people have this idea that Rolls Royces have to be tasteful things of beauty. They have nearly always been both that and outrageously over the top tacky chromefests - even in the twenties people were marrying them with crazy amounts of chrome grille and in-your-face oppulence:
I think there's plenty of room for both. (I do think the latest Black Series Wraiths are of very questionable taste, mind you - this makes those look like chavved-up Novas in comparison.)
Indeed, just google image search "maharajah Rolls Royces" and feast your eyes on the tasteless glitter-rolled turdfest that was RR bespoke from the 20s to the 40s.



Edited by Pothole on Tuesday 30th May 07:23

belleair302

6,867 posts

208 months

Monday 29th May 2017
quotequote all
The profile image is stunning. Front just doesn't work, and the rear to me is more for safety than beauty. Alas modern car design rules make bespoke cars nearly impossible to look 'stunning'. Blame the EU.

Superdavros

236 posts

233 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
It looks very impressive in the flesh...

cookie1600

2,148 posts

162 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
Does anyone actually know if the body mods/coachwork was carried out by Rolls Royce at Goodwood? That's an awful lot of specialised conversion going on and IMO I didn't think they had facilities to do that level of body in white redevelopment?


Dr S

4,999 posts

227 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
There must have been some old Maybach parts available for the back-end that they could pimp with more chrome for this one-off... horrid

soad

32,942 posts

177 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
MDL111 said:
I quite like it
Isn't 8 a lucky number in China?
Me too.

Olympic games in China started on August 8, 2008 (or 08/08/08).
In China, you have to pay extra to have the number 8 in your phone number or license plate.

AshBurrows

2,552 posts

163 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
I'd say you're already pretty lucky to be born to a family that owns half of London and HK haha. This planet is absurd.

robinessex

11,081 posts

182 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
I'd get them to make me this. With a V16 engine as well, sure they must have one gathering dust somewhere:-




SturdyHSV

10,121 posts

168 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all


This tweak alone would have (quite cheaply) helped things out a fair bit, and made it more pleasant inside.

EDIT:

It's odd really as they appear to have already drawn the design intention on to the side, then just got bored half way through and didn't bother making the window fit.

Edited by SturdyHSV on Tuesday 30th May 16:35

cookie1600

2,148 posts

162 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
Mind you, it's hardly new creating coachbuilt bodies on Rolls Royce (and similar) cars. They've even nicked some of the design cues from this James Young bodied Phantom V:


Krikkit

26,592 posts

182 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
SturdyHSV said:


This tweak alone would have (quite cheaply) helped things out a fair bit, and made it more pleasant inside.
No seats in the back - why bother?

SturdyHSV

10,121 posts

168 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
No seats in the back - why bother?
Makes the C pillar look less clumsy, better visibility (not that I imagine that's a big concern) and even more airy cabin?

Just think it looks nicer than the huge C pillar with tiny window in, clearly the buyer didn't though and he's got the money to back up the paint skills!

MrScrot

77 posts

163 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
I don't completely dislike it. I like the bullet tail and the glass roof. The front is vile and gaudy though and since someone pointed it out earlier on this thread, it's been hard to ignore that rear overhang.

canucklehead

416 posts

147 months

Tuesday 30th May 2017
quotequote all
This is what happens when money outruns taste. Just awful, even uglier than a standard one.

MarkSwan

12 posts

85 months

Thursday 1st June 2017
quotequote all
Sorry but Rolls Royce have just completely lost their way. Bentley every time for me.
That is one ugly, pointless motor.

Charlie Hoskins

310 posts

84 months

Thursday 1st June 2017
quotequote all
Is that rear plate legal ?