RE: Driven: Subaru WRX STI Type UK

RE: Driven: Subaru WRX STI Type UK

Author
Discussion

Wills2

23,133 posts

176 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Porsche997C4S said:
Fine, what about an evo then? They look better.
Stop trolling this thread......

adz13091982

185 posts

169 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
What a sack of S$$T! Looks like a KIA thats crashed into a Ripspeed store. Evo has this nailed.

rb5230

11,657 posts

173 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
Porsche997C4S said:
Fine, what about an evo then? They look better.
Stop trolling this thread......
+1 and for an alleged Porsche enthusiast i am suprised you can`t spell "boxster".

ManOpener

12,467 posts

170 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
adz13091982 said:
What a sack of S$$T! Looks like a KIA thats crashed into a Ripspeed store. Evo has this nailed.
Looks like a Laguna with a stupid bodykit, IMHO.

northernmonkeyx

14 posts

177 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Oh dear! they are still are long way off on the design. It looks ste!

ellisd82

685 posts

209 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Complex said:
I think the rear looks very bland and 'boring Jap rep-mobile', just with added E90 M3 tailpipes. I do, however, like the front styling a lot.

Just seen the side profile picture, could that rear quarter get any more 3 series?

Edited by Complex on Friday 8th October 00:40
Just what I was going to say. Spot on!

WorAl

10,877 posts

189 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Hold on a minute scratchchin


sledge68

760 posts

198 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
dont be daft look at the pillar design, and toyotas arnt cool

WorAl said:
Hold on a minute scratchchin

Stu R

21,410 posts

216 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
WorAl said:
Hold on a minute scratchchin

I see what you mean, nothing alike at all hehe

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Porsche997C4S said:
rb5230 said:
Porsche997C4S said:
rb5230 said:
Porsche997C4S said:
Sorry but couldn't pay £33k for a car that ugly, why not get a GTI if your spending this amount- it's got a bit of class. All IMO of course.
what gti? a golf? ermm this would piss
on a golf.
oh well the looks, interior and overall quality piss on a Subaru.
i think you are missing the point of why people would want to buy an impreza sti, usually they dont want to spend good money on a blandmobile as they prefer more outlandish looks and are generally more interested in performance than image.
fine then, Put a body kit on the golf and tune it.
lol, but it would still be a dull as dish water blandmobile Golf....

mcelliott

8,724 posts

182 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
In the past, Subaru could make kak looking cars that drove well and get away with it because they were quite well priced, but as has been mentioned earlier on this thread, the price could be a major stumbling block when you look at what's on offer from the competition.

Definitely a marmite car.

SR06

749 posts

187 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I've only just worked out why I don't like the side. Its the windows. They have a frame round them and look Mk3 Escort. They need to be frameless for a smooth modern look. The hatch has grown on me. I'd consider a hatch if It wasn't for those lexus tail lights!

stirl

7 posts

218 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
A dull looking Toyota type affair

superman84

772 posts

166 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all

I think you've grabbed the complete wrong end of the stick there.
The poster originally said that the Golf GTi was better than the Impreza then came out with above crap about Subaru being a step up from Vauxhall.
[/quote]

yeh got that I was getting at porsche mans badge snobbry

GravelBen

15,737 posts

231 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Porsche997C4S said:
Fine, what about an evo then? They look better.
The pig-nosed 1620kg whale? rofl Thanks, but no thanks.



Edited by GravelBen on Friday 8th October 23:02

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
MonkeyMatt said:
Would choose this any day of the week! looks 10 times better for a start!



Looks like a fridge crossed with a storm-trooper. A £10 filled Oyster card would be preferable.

Andy_J_G

323 posts

210 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
MonkeyMatt said:
Would choose this any day of the week! looks 10 times better for a start!



You are so right, that WRX is fugly, even the bug eyed version looked better.

neema_T

216 posts

207 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
"The new WRX STI's suspension is the key to all the fun. It is essentially an adapted version of the Japanese spec.C suspension, tuned to a slightly softer edge for European roads.


That means a lower ride height, stiffer springs and bushes, and thicker anti-roll bars at both ends. "

Surely these measures makes the ride a bit harder than the Japanese model? Much nicer looking thing than the hatchback though, shame they killed the Impreza name, though. I presume that's because it's always been known as the WRX STi in America?

GravelBen

15,737 posts

231 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
I think they mean those differences relative to the UK model being replaced, which was softer and not as sharp as other markets.

AndySpecD

436 posts

188 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Well I like it.

Great that Subaru are offering the WRX STI as a saloon again although don't understand why they've ditched the Impreza name.

I want one!