RE: New TVR Griffith - official

RE: New TVR Griffith - official

Author
Discussion

Limpet

6,346 posts

162 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
The worst thing about the launch has been the negativity on here. Entirely predictable sadly.
Not just here, but everywhere else. I don't get it. Nobody until today had seen the car, nobody knew anything other than a small handful of headline numbers, yet they were already dismissing it as a failure / too expensive / unreliable / badly made. It's laughable.

On another forum there was one muppet who, having taken a wild guess at some of Les Edgar's maths, went on to write an entire essay about why it was wrong and how Edgar would lose all his money. You couldn't make it up.

TheLuke

2,218 posts

142 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
Back end is the best bit. I think they have done it right, apart from the wheels.

All the way since this has been announced people have been negative, they wont do this, it wont be this, it wont look like this.

They have done it, this is a good result and I like the looks, we need to see it go now.

wab172uk

2,005 posts

228 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
The styling is so disappointing IMHO

The rear looks to Track racer, and the front looks far too bland with a silly smile with the front grill. And those wheels .................... Jesus !

TVR always stood for 911 Turbo performance for less money than a standard 911 Carrera.

Starting price of £90,000 ! Wow.

For £90k, I'd want something that looked better than a looking like a Kit car.

Think the Board of Porsche will be having a very merry Executive lunch today. So will McLaren etc.

stuckmojo

2,989 posts

189 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
It looks less exciting and edgy than the concept and teasers.

However, those photos, the red colour and those ghastly wheels are very unflattering.

I reckon it will be a good looking car in dark metallic green with sensible wheels. Love the side pipes.

The goodwood photos are better.

Still, moronic choice of colour and wheels.

V8VTim

212 posts

213 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
Sorry, I can only add to the negativity, exterior and interior totally underwhelming. For the money it would be a Mustang and keep the substantial change or moving up a V8 Vantage S.
Glad I used my head and not my heart when it came to the deposit.

drewbagz

183 posts

165 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
The head on shot doesn't do it any favours but it looks great in the angle shot.

Very much looking forward to seeing / hearing it on the road.

A little disappointed by the electric power steering though, would have expected hydraulic.

V41LEY

2,897 posts

239 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
[quote=wab172uk]The styling is so disappointing IMHO

The rear looks to Track racer, and the front looks far too bland with a silly smile with the front grill. And those wheels .................... Jesus !

TVR always stood for 911 Turbo performance for less money than a standard 911 Carrera.

Starting price of £90,000 ! Wow.

For £90k, I'd want something that looked better than a looking like a Kit car.

Think the Board of Porsche will be having a very merry Executive lunch today. So will McLaren etc.


With respect, I don't think Les' target market is the Porsche or McLaren mob. That's for the brave, safe - dare I say dull - souls.


Plus Faw

6 posts

165 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
To me it looks like a Mazda at the front -- the specs are tasty, though!!

CO2000

3,177 posts

210 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
Great to see TVR back but I did think RX8 from the 1st pic initially, speed 12 from the rear & wheels from ebay!

Perhaps that's why PH didn't comment on the looks in the article?

Hopefully they push on taking feedback into consideration and become very successful again smile

NickCQ

5,392 posts

97 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
I know moaning is a PH tradition, but I think it looks great. There are details that I would prefer to have been handled differently, but I would certainly choose it over its direct competitors (boggo 911 / fast F type / Cayman GT4 / Alpine?)

Smitters

4,013 posts

158 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
God. I've just watched the launch video on the Goodwood facebook page. Filmed on a potato, car is started, mildly revs, then stops, unclear if they meant to kill it, whole crown uncomfortable, the curtain drops and everyone goes... a bit quiet. Hmmm. I don't think the negativity on here is misplaced to be honest. I've been looking for about an hour on and off and nothing I've come into contact with so far seems of any decent quality.

1) pics are rubbish

2) in this youtube age, there's no good video

3) in the one video I have found with the engine being used, the test mule looks better than the finished car. Error!

If they've dropped every ball going for something like a launch, how well are they going to actually manage building a whole load of cars?

swanny71

2,862 posts

210 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
Mixed emotions now that it's finally been revealed.
Dissapointed because to me it looks a bit rubbish yet relieved that having seen it I don't desperately want something I can't really afford to own.
I still wish them all the very best though and hope they go on to produce a 'lesser' model that's better looking and more affordable.

mellowman

352 posts

249 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
Had an original Griff but am mildly disappointed with this new one.

Looks a little generic and an amalgamation of several other cars (but not previous TVRs), as already noted.

Interior is also a let down considering the price.

Ah yes, the price! I'll never be able to afford one unless they tank on the used car market.

I wonder what this will do to the price of original Griffs?

ChilliWhizz

11,993 posts

162 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
PistonHeads.... where stupid comments, negativity, complaining, and putting the efforts of others down matters...

AmosMoses

4,042 posts

166 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all


Wheels really do make the car, forgive my 5 minute photoshop. IMO it needs multi spokes and fatter tyres.


Porsche911R

21,146 posts

266 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
wab172uk said:
The styling is so disappointing IMHO

The rear looks to Track racer, and the front looks far too bland with a silly smile with the front grill. And those wheels .................... Jesus !

TVR always stood for 911 Turbo performance for less money than a standard 911 Carrera.

Starting price of £90,000 ! Wow.

For £90k, I'd want something that looked better than a looking like a Kit car.

Think the Board of Porsche will be having a very merry Executive lunch today. So will McLaren etc.
that's £30k cheaper than an Evora with 430 BHP :-)

but it's a shame it has EPS and looks rank :-(

the UK needs a £60k 2 seater sports car with a NA 400 bhp engine, it cannot be that hard to do !

alexrogers92

71 posts

95 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
This is like a really ugly SLS AMG at the front and a really skewed/ugly Lexus LFA at the rear. Yuck.

MrChips

3,264 posts

211 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
AmosMoses said:


Wheels really do make the car, forgive my 5 minute photoshop. IMO it needs multi spokes and fatter tyres.
yes

Kitchski

6,516 posts

232 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
900T-R said:
TVRs have had EPAS from the Tamora onwards (T350, Tuscan 2, Sagaris)...
Nope, they had hydraulic too, it's just the pump was electric.

B210bandit

513 posts

98 months

Friday 8th September 2017
quotequote all
About time the GT86 got some more power.